Skip to main content
Log in

MMC and LD simulations of α-D-Manp-(1→2)-β-D-Glcp-OMe: comparison to long-range heteronuclear NMR coupling constants and to the crystal structure

  • Published:
Glycoconjugate Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conformational flexibility and the dynamics of α-D-Manp-(1→2)-β-D-Glcp-OMe have been investigated by Metropolis Monte Carlo (MMC) and Langevin dynamics (LD) simulations. The two simulation techniques employ different force fields, namely the HSEA force field and a CHARMm-based force field. The former shows less conformational flexibility than the latter, in which a multiple energy minima conformational space is sampled. Long-range heteronuclear nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants have been measured by selective excitations of the carbons at the glycosidic linkage. Calculated 3JC, H values from MMC and LD simulations show excellent agreement to those from NMR experiments. The X-ray crystal structure has a conformation within a region of the conformational space populated in both force fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schachter H (1986) Biochem Cell Biol 64: 163-81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kornfeld R, Kornfeld S (1985) Ann Rev Biochem 54: 631-64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakomori S-I (1989) Adv Cancer Res 52: 257–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis JW (1991) In Cell Surface Carbohydrates and Cell Development (Fukuda M, ed.) pp 161-94. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. InsightII User Guide, October 1995. San Diego: Biosym/MSI, 1995.

  6. Discover User Guide, October 1995. San Diego: Biosym/MSI, 1995.

  7. CFF95 User Guide, October 1995. San Diego: Biosym/MSI, 1995.

  8. Imberty A, Delage MM, Bourne Y, Cambillau C, Pérez S (1991) Glycoconjugate J 8: 456-83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Imberty A, Pérez S, Hricovíni M, Shah RN, Carver JP (1993) Int J Biol Macromol 17: 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tvaroska I, Pérez S, Marchessault R (1978) Carbohyd Res 61: 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brisson J-R, Carver JP (1983) Biochemistry 22: 1362-68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qasba PK, Balaji PV, Rao VSR (1994) Glycobiology 4: 805-15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rutherford TJ, Partridge J, Weller CT, Homans SW (1993) Biochemistry 32: 12715-24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carver JP, Mandel D, Michnick SW, Imberty A, Brady JW (1990) In Computer Modeling of Carbohydrate Molecules ACS Symposium Series Vol. 430 (French AD, Brady JW, eds) pp 266-80. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaanan B, Lis H, Sharon N (1991) Science 254: 862.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lommerse JPM, Kroon-Batenburg LMJ, Kroon J, Kamerling JP, Vliegenhart JFG (1995) J Biomolecular NMR 5: 79-94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lommerse JPM, Kroon-Batenburg LMJ, Kamerling JP, Vliegenhart JFG (1995) Biochemistry 34: 8196-206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoog, C., Widmalm, G. MMC and LD simulations of α-D-Manp-(1→2)-β-D-Glcp-OMe: comparison to long-range heteronuclear NMR coupling constants and to the crystal structure. Glycoconj J 15, 183–186 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006924424004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006924424004

Navigation