Advertisement

European Journal of Political Research

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 181–197 | Cite as

Is local politics local? French evidence

  • Bruno Jérôme
  • Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Article

Abstract

In advanced democracies, are local political decisions determined by local events? Or are they really shaped by national forces? For the United States case, the evidence on this question is mixed. For the French case, the focus here, the evidence is also mixed, but less hard. In fact, for cantonal elections, in many ways archtypical local affairs, relevant systematic findings are virtually absent. We ask whether the cantonal elections of the Fifth Republic can be better understood as national, rather than local, contests. Our analysis leads us to the conclusion that the basic answer is, ‘yes’. There appear several theoretical reasons for this, which we give an account of. Further, we go on to show that cantonal races can actually serve as barometers to forecast upcoming national races.

Keywords

Local Event States Case Political Decision Theoretical Reason Systematic Finding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becquart-Leclercq, J. (1980). Local political recruitment in France and the United States: A study of mayors, European Journal of Political Research 8: 407–422.Google Scholar
  2. Bois, P. (1960). Paysans de l'Ouest. Le Mans: Imprimerie M. Vilaire.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, J.E. (1986). Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative elections, American Political Science Review 80: 45–63.Google Scholar
  4. Dion, S. (1992). Le cumul des mandats en France, French Politics and Society 13: 99–126.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrmann, H.W. (1983). Politics in France, 4th edn. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  6. FNSP (1991). Survey: Les conseillers généraux en 1991, Revue française de science politique 42: 109–121.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman-Martinot, V., Rallings, C. & Thrasher, M. (1996). Comparing local electoral turnout in Great Britain and France: More similarities than differences?, European Journal of Political Research 30: 241–257.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobson, G.C. (1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US House elections, 1946–1990, American Political Science Review 83: 773–793.Google Scholar
  9. Jaffré, J. & Parodi, J.-L. (1978). À la recherche d'un barometre electoral Les élections cantonales partielles au cours de la législature 1973–1978, Pouvoirs 6: 133–147.Google Scholar
  10. Jewell, M. (1968). State decision-making The governor revisited. In A. Wildavsky & Nelson Polsby (eds.), American Government Institutions. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  11. Lafay, J.-D. (1977). Les conséquences électorales de la conjoncture économique. Vie et Sciences Economiques 75: 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Lafay, J.-D. (1985). Important political change and stability of the popularity function: The French general election of 1981. In H. Eulau & M.S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lafay, J.-D. (1991). Political dyarchy and popularity functions: Lessons from the 1986 French experience. In H. Norpoth, M.S. Lewis-Beck & J.-D. Lafay (eds.), Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support.Google Scholar
  14. Lafay, J.-D. & Jérôme, B. (1991). Qualité de la gestion municipale et résultats électoraux des maires sortants: analyse empirique des élections de mars 1989, Economie 1991 (Université de Perpignan).Google Scholar
  15. Lancelot, A. ed. (1986). 1981: Les Élections de L'Alternance. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  16. Lecaillon, J. (1980) Salaires, chômage, et situation politique. Revue economique No. 5 (sept- oct): 615–627.Google Scholar
  17. Lecaillon, J. (1991). La logique du soutien politique, Analyses de la SEDEIS No. 83 (sept): 21–26.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1985). Un modèle de prèvision des élections législatives françaises (avec une application pour 1986), Revue française de science politique 35: 1080–1091.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1991). French national elections: Political economic forecasts, European Journal of Political Economy 7: 487–496.Google Scholar
  21. Mabileau, A. (1989). Les héritiers des notables, Pouvoirs 49: 93–103.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, Th.E. (1978). Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Marsh, M. (1995). Testing the second-order model after four European elections. Paper presented at the ECPRWorkshops, Bordeaux 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, N. & Perrineau, P. (1992). Les comportements politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  25. Michelat, G. (1993). In search of left and right. In D. Boy & N. Mayer (eds.), The French Voter Decides. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mingat, A. & Salmon, P. (1986). Choisir sa population pour gagner les élections? Une étude empirique sur les élections municipales de 1953 à 1983, Revue française de science politique 36: 182–204.Google Scholar
  27. Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S. & Lafay, J.-D. eds. (1991). Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Norris, P. (1997). Second-order elections revisited, European Journal of Political Research 31: 109–114.Google Scholar
  29. Peltzman, S. (1987). Economic conditions and gubernatorial elections, AEA Papers and Proceedings 7: 293–297.Google Scholar
  30. Ponceyri, R. (1989). Les élections sous la Vème République. Paris: Editions Privat (Collection sciences politiques).Google Scholar
  31. Reif, K. (1997). European elections as member state second-order elections revisited, European Journal of Political Research 31: 115–124.Google Scholar
  32. Reif, K. & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research 8: 3–44.Google Scholar
  33. Rosa, J.J. & Amson, D. (1976). Conditions économiques et élections: une analyse politicoéconometrique (1920–1973), Revue française de science politique 26: 1101–1124.Google Scholar
  34. Safran, W. (1995). The French Polity, 4th edn. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  35. Siegfried, A. (1913). Tableau Politique de la France de l'Ouest sous la Troisième Republique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  36. Siegfried, A. (1949). Géographie Electorale de l'Ardèche sous la IIIe République. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  37. Spitzer, A.B. (1989). The elections of 1824 and 1827 in the department of the Doubs, French History 3: 153–176.Google Scholar
  38. Tufte, E.R. (1975). Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections, American Political Science Review 69: 812–826.Google Scholar
  39. van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wylie, L. (1974). Village in the Vaucluse, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ysmal, C. & Habert, P. (1990). Le baromètre des partielles. Etudes Politiques, Figaro (February 5): 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Jérôme
    • 1
  • Michael S. Lewis-Beck
    • 2
  1. 1.Université de MetzFrance
  2. 2.University of IowaUSA

Personalised recommendations