Abstract
In the advisory report to the European Commission (Huls et al., 1994), the conclusion was reached that the optimal European solution for overindebtedness of consumers is a combination of legal change and a strengthening of the work of social debt counsellors. It was argued that the two spheres, the legal and the social, should be linked in order to create a constructive coalition.
Europe has learned from the USA how to introduce the concept "discharge of debts" into their legislation (Huls, 1992). The USA may learn from Europe how debt counsellors can play a more vital part in tackling the debt problem of consumers. This paper explores the possibilities for expanding the domain of non-legal actors in this field by looking at legal aid discussions in general, and more specifically at the new Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) trend that is developing both in the USA and Europe.
In the first section of the paper, the importance of an adequate definition of the problem is stressed. The following section summarizes the model proposed in Huls et al. (1994). It is followed by a plea for professional and independent debt counselling, a prerequisite for dejuridification of the debt problem, and for a coupling of debt problems to legal aid discussions. This leads to the conclusion that a strong case can be made for debt counselling as a form of ADR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abel, R. L. (Ed.), The policies of informal justice, 2 vols. New York: Academic Press.
Davies, J. (1982). Judicial welfare and socio-legal approaches to debt, with specific reference to mechanisms for dealing with individuals with multiple debts. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Davies, J. E. (1986). Delegalisation of debt recovery proceedings: A socio-legal study of money advice centres and administration orders. In: I. Ramsay (Ed.), Debtors and creditors: A socio-legal perspective, pp. 182-207. Abingdon: Professional Books.
Hicks, S. C., & Ramsay, C. (1987). Law and order and the bankruptcy commissions of early nineteenth century England. Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis, 55, 123-135.
Huls, N. (1992). American influences on European consumer bankruptcy law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 15, 125-142.
Huls, N., Ackermann, H., Bourgoignie, T., Domont-Naert, F., Haane, B., Van Huffel, M., Reich, N., Reifner, U., & Roseval, L. (1994). Overindebtedness of consumers in the EC member states: Facts and search for solutions. Louvain-la-Neuve: Centre de Droit de la Consommation.
Lomax, L. A. (1994). Alternative dispute resolution in bankruptcy: Rule 9019 and bankruptcy mediation programmes. American Bankruptcy Journal, 68, 55-90.
Röhl, K. F. (1982). Rechtspolitische und ideologische Hintergründe der Diskussion über Alternativen zur Justiz. In: E. Blankenburg, W. Gottwald, & D. Strempel (Eds.), Alternative in der Ziviljustiz, pp. 15-27. Köln: Bundesanzeiger Verlag.
Röhl, K. F. (1983). Schuldbeitreibung als Kontrolle abweichenden Verhaltens. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 5, 1-25.
Smith, R. (Ed.) (1992). A strategy for justice. London: Legal Action Group.
Smith, R. (Ed.) (1996). Achieving civil justice, appropriate dispute for the 1990's. London: Legal Action Group.
Stanley, D., & Girth, M. (1971). Bankruptcy: problems, process, reform. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Tomasic, R. (1980). Mediation as alternative to adjudication: Rhetoric and reality in the Neighborhood Justice Movement. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Disputes Processing Research Programme Working Paper No. 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huls, N. Overindebtedness and Overlegalization: Consumer Bankruptcy as a Field for Alternative Dispute Resolution. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 143–159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006896219436
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006896219436