Social Indicators Research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 367–379 | Cite as

Use of Other-Reports to Validate Subjective Well-Being Measures

  • Heidi S. Lepper


Level of agreement between self-reports and other-reports obtained from a large two-wave study of older adults was examined. Various measures of subjective well-being (affect, happiness, and life satisfaction) and behavioral manifestations (smoking and sleep quality) were assessed. Results indicate that the SWB measures were highly stable over a 9-month period, and that good agreement between the self- and other-reports was found for the SWB measures. In addition, SWB was related to behavioral manifestations and that these ratings were corroborated through the other-reports. This study furthers the support for the reliability of SWB over time and advances the criterion validity of SWB measures through use of collateral assessments.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, T.: 1982, ‘The stability and validity of quality of life measures’ Social Indicators Research 10, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
  2. Bradburn, N.M.: 1969, The Structure of Psychological Well-Being (Alpine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A., P. Converse, W. Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, K., S. Zika: 1992, ‘Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time periods’ Social Indicators Research 26, pp. 101–117.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J.: 1977, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Rev. Ed.) (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  6. Costa, P.T., Jr., R.R. McCrae: 1988, ‘Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, pp. 853–863.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E.: 1994, ‘Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities’ Social Indicators Research 31, pp. 103–157.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E., R.J. Larsen: 1984, ‘Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, pp. 871–883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., R.A. Emmons, R.J. Larsen, S. Griffin: 1985, ‘The Satisfaction With Life Scale’ Journal of Personality Assessment 49, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  10. Hays, R.D., A.L. Stewart: 1992, ‘Sleep measures’ in A.L. Stewart, J.E. Ware (eds.), Measuring Functioning and Well-Being (Durham and London: Duke University Press), pp. 235–259.Google Scholar
  11. Headey, B., A. Wearing: 1989, ‘Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, pp. 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horley, J., J.J. Lavery: 1991, ‘The stability and sensitivity of subjective well-being measures’ Social Indicators Research 24, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
  13. Kozma, A., M.A. Stones, K. McNeil: 1991, Subjective Well-Being in Later Life (Butterworths, Toronto).Google Scholar
  14. McDowell, I., C. Newell: 1987, Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  15. Palmore, E.B., V. Kivett: 1977, ‘Changes in life satisfaction: A longitudinal study of persons aged 46–70’ Journal of Gerontology 32, pp. 311-316.Google Scholar
  16. Pavot, W., E. Diener, C.R. Colvin, E. Sandvik: 1991, ‘Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures’ Journal of Personality Assessment 57, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
  17. Stewart, A.L., J.E. Ware, C.D. Sherbourne, K.B. Wells: 1992, ‘Psychological distress/well-being and cognitive functioning measures’ in A.L. Stewart, J.E. Ware (eds.), Measuring Functioning and Well-Being (Durham and London: Duke University Press), pp. 102–142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi S. Lepper
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Family ResearchIowa State UniversityAmesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations