Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epidemiologic study of environmental sources in a Prototheca zopfii outbreak of bovine mastitis

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bovine mastitis represents the main form of occurrence of protothecosis in animals. The detection of mastitis caused by Prototheca sp. indicates a serious problem which can affect an entire herd. The purpose of this study is to explain some aspects of the epidemiology of mastitis due to Prototheca zopfii with the evaluation of the presence of these microorganisms in samples collected from potential sources in the dairy herd. This study was performed during a Prototheca zopfii outbreak of clinical bovine mastitis in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The following samples were aseptically collected for microbiological examination: milk (n = 211); rectal swabs (from 15 calves and 2 lactating cows); swabs from teat cup rubbers during milking (n = 2); water (n = 6); soil (n = 6). Prototheca zopfii was isolated from 77 (36.49%) of the 211 milk samples; 11 calves and 2 cows showed Prototheca zopfii in faecal samples; both swabs collected from the teat cup rubbers showed viable forms of Prototheca zopfii; this microorganism was also isolated from 2 water samples, and 1 soil sample collected from the dry cow pasture. Prototheca zopfii seemed to be widespread throughout the dairy herd environment where this outbreak of bovine mastitis occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pore RS, Barnett EA, Barnes Jr WC, Walker JD. Prototheca ecology. Mycopathologia 1983; 81: 49-62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iacoviello VR, Degirolami PC, Lucarini J, Sutker K, Williams ME, Wanke CA. Protothecosis complicating prolonged endotracheal intubation: case report and literature review. Clin Infec Dis 1992; 5: 959–67.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Costa EO, Melville PA, Ribeiro AR, Watanabe ET. Relato de um caso de consumo de queijo fresco contaminado com Protothecasp. In: Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa em Medicina Veterinária, 1. São Paulo, Brazil: Anais, 1995: 55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heney C, Greeff M, Davis V. Hickman catheter-related protothecal algaemia in an immunocompromised child. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 930-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaminski ZC, Kapila R, Sharer LR, Kloser P, Kaufman L. Meningitis due to Prototheca wickerhamiiin a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15: 704-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies RR, Speneer H, Wakelin PO. A case of human protothecosis. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 1964; 58: 448-451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirk JH. Diagnosis and treatment of difficult mastitis cases. Agri-practice 1991; 12:15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costa EO, Carciofi AC, Melville PA, Prada MA, Ribeiro AR, Watanabe ET. Bovine mastitis due to algae of the genus Protothecasp. Mycopathologia 1996; 133: 85-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coloe PJ. Protothecosis in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1982; 180: 78-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox GE, Wilson JD, Brown P. Protothecosis: a case of disseminated algal infection. Lancet 1974; 2: 379-82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macartney L, Rycroft AN, Hammil J. Cutaneous protothecosis in the dog: first confirmed case in Britain. Vet Rec 1988; 123: 494-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pore RS, Shahan TA. Prototheca zopfii: natural, transient, occurrence in pigs and rats. Mycopathologia 1988; 101: 85-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers RJ. Protothecal lymphadenitis in an ox. Aust Vet J 1974; 50: 281-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Kruiningen HJ. Protothecal enterocolitis in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 157: 56-63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Costa EO, Ribeiro AR, Watanabe ET, Pardo RB, Silva JAB, Sanches RB. An increase incidence of mastitis caused by Protothecaspecies and Nocardiaspecies on a farm in São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Res Commun 1996; 20: 237-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Costa EO da, Carciofi AC, Melville PA, Prada MS, Schalch U. Protothecasp. outbreak of bovine mastitis. J Vet Med 1996; 43: 321-324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank N, Ferguson LC, Cross RF, Redman DR. Prototheca, a cause of bovine mastitis. Am J Vet Res 1969; 30: 1785-94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hodges RT, Holland JTS, Neilson FJA, Wallace NM. Prototheca zopfiimastitis in a herd of dairy cows. New Zeal Vet J 1985; 33: 108-11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aalbaek B, Stenderup J, Jensen HE, Valbak J, Nylin B, Huda A. Mycotic and algal mastitis in Denmark. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1994; 102: 451-6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Almeraya AP. Aislamiento de Protothecaen un brote de mastitis bovina. Vet Mex 1994; 25: 65-7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson KL, Walker RL. Sources ofProtothecaspp. in a dairy herd environment. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193: 553-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Costa EO, Carciofi AC, Melville PA, Prada MS, Ribeiro AR, Watanabe ET. Epidemiological studies on bovine protothecosis. In: World Buiatrics Congress, 18. Bologna, Italy: Proceedings, 1994: 853-855.

  23. Camargo ZP. Algas do gênero Prototheca: características microbiológicas e imunológicas [Thesis]. São Paulo: Escola Paulista de Medicina, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Costa EO, Melville PA, Benites NR, Ribeiro AR, Watanabe ET, Silva JAB, Garino Jr F. Prototheca zopfii: sensibilidade “in vitro”. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária, 24. Goiânia, Brazil: Anais, 1996: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Casal M, Aroca JG. Investigación de la sensibilidad de Prototheca zopfiia los antif´ungicos, quimioterápicos y sulfamidas. Rev Lat Am Microbiol 1983; 25: 259-62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mcdonald JS, Richard JL, Anderson AJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Prototheca zopfiiisolated from bovine intramammary infections. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 1079-80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Segal E, Padhye AA, Ajello L. Susceptibility of Protothecaspecies to antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976; 10: 75-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheville NF, Mcdonald J, Richard J. Ultrastructure ofPrototheca zopfiiin bovine granulomatous mastitis. Vet Pathol 1984; 21: 341-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Furuoka H, Anri A, Arita Y, Tuzuki N, Satoh H, Itakura C. Protothecal mastitis in a cow. Jap Jour Vet Med 1989; 51: 197-9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mcdonald JS, Richard JL, Cheville NF. Natural and experimental bovine intramammary infection with Prototheca zopfii.Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 592-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schalm OW, Noorlander DO. Experimental and observation leading to development of California Mastitis Test. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1957; 139: 199-204.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Krieg NR, Holt JC., eds. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. 9 ed. Baltimore: Willians & Wilkins, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pore RS. Protothecataxonomy. Mycopathologia 1985; 90: 129-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Camargo ZP, Fischman O. Use of morpho-physiological characteristics for differentiation of the species of Prototheca.Sabouraudia 1979; 17: 275-8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Atkinson AW, Gunning BES, John PCL. Sporopollenin in the cell wall of Chlorellaand other algae: ultrastructure, chemistry and incorporation of 14C-acetate, studied in synchronous cultures. Planta 1972; 107: 1-32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, E., Melville, P., Ribeiro, A. et al. Epidemiologic study of environmental sources in a Prototheca zopfii outbreak of bovine mastitis. Mycopathologia 137, 33–36 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006871213521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006871213521

Navigation