, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 111–131 | Cite as

Sustainable and Excessive Current Account Deficits

  • Helmut Reisen


Both the Mexican crisis of 1994–95 and the Asian financial crisis of 1997–98 have been preceded by large current account deficits run by the affected economies. External deficits are often assumed to play an important role in the propagation of financial crises in emerging markets. Policymakers are faced with a new challenge: that of resisting or accepting the large current account deficits that may result from heavy private capital inflows. This paper aims at providing some guidance:

First, the Lawson Doctrine – according to which current account deficits that result from a shift in private-sector behaviour should not be a public policy concern – has been discredited by recent currency crises in Latin America and Asia. Second, define the size of current account deficits that should be sustainable in the long run. Third, the intertemporal approach to the current account does not provide a reliable benchmark to define when deficits become ‘excessive’. Fourth, large external deficits should be resisted if unsustainable currency appreciation, excessive risk-taking in the banking system and a sharp private spending boom are seen to coincide.

Current account deficits private capital flows 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agosin, M.R. (1994) ‘Saving and Investment in Latin America', UNCTAD Discussion Papers, No. 90.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, P.S. and White, R.W. (1996) ‘The Macroeconomic Effects of Financial Sector Reforms: An Overview of Industrial Countries', mimeo, Basle: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
  3. Artus, P. (1996) ‘Le financement de la croissance par endettement extérieur', Document de travail No. 1996–05/T, Paris: Caisse des dépôts et consignations.Google Scholar
  4. Blundell-Wignall, A. and Browne, F. (1991) ‘Macroeconomic Consequences of Financial Liberalisation: A Summary Report', ESD Working Paper No. 98, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  5. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. and Lee, J-W. (1995) ‘How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?', NBER Working Paper No. 5057, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Calvo, G. (1987) ‘On the Costs of Temporary Policy', Journal of Development Economics 27, 147–69.Google Scholar
  7. Calvo, G. Leiderman, L. and Reinhart, C. (1996) ‘Inflows of Capital to Developing Countries in the 1990s', Journal of Economic Perspectives 10.2, 123–40.Google Scholar
  8. Caprio, Jr., G. and Klingebeil, D. (1996) ‘Bank Insolvency: Bad Luck, Bad Policy, or Bad Banking?', Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Corden, W.M. (1977) Inflation, Exchange Rates and the International System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corden, W.M. (1994) Economic Policy, Exchange Rates and the International System. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, S. (1995) ‘Why are Saving Rates So Different Across Countries?: An International Comparative Analysis', NBER Working Paper No. 5097, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, S., Steiner, R. and Losada, F. (1996) ‘Capital Inflows, the Real Exchange Rate and the Mexican Crisis of 1994', in H. Sautter and R. Schinke (eds.), Stabilization and Reform in Latin America: Where Do We Stand?, Frankfurt, Vervuert.Google Scholar
  13. Frankel, J. and Rose, A.K. (1996) ‘Currency Crashes in Emerging Markets: Empirical Indicators', NBER Working Paper No. 5437. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Fry, M. (1996) ‘How Foreign Direct Investment in Pacific Asia Improves the Current Account', Journal of Asian Economics 7(3), 459–486.Google Scholar
  15. Gavin, M. and Hausmann, R. (1996) ‘The Roots of Banking Crises: The Macroeconomic Context', Working Paper Series 318, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Glick, R. and Rogoff, K. (1995) ‘Global versus Country-Specific Productivity Shocks and the Current Account', Journal of Monetary Economics, May.Google Scholar
  17. Halpern, L. and Wyplosz, C. (1996) ‘Equilibrium Exchange Rates in Transition Economies', IMF Working Paper 96/125 (November).Google Scholar
  18. Harberger, A. (1985) ‘Lessons for Debtor-Country Managers and Policymakers', In G.W. Smith and J.T. Cuddington (eds.), International Debt and the Developing Countries, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 236–257.Google Scholar
  19. Hausmann, R. and Reisen, H. (eds.) (1996), Securing Stability and Growth in Latin America: Policy Issues and Prospects for Shock-Prone Economies, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  20. Heller, H.R. and Khan, M.S. (1978) ‘The Demand for International Reserves Under Fixed and Floating Exchange Rates', IMF Staff Papers 25.4, 623–649.Google Scholar
  21. Heymann, D. (1994) ‘En la interpretacion de la cuenta corriente', Economia Mexicana 3.1.Google Scholar
  22. Kaminsky, G. and Reinhart, C.M. (1996) ‘The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems', Working Paper No. 17, University of Maryland at College Park: Center for International Economics.Google Scholar
  23. Larraín, G. (1996) ‘Productividad del gasto publico y tipo de cambio real', In: F. Morande (ed.), Estudios empiricos de tipo de cambio real in Chile, Santiago de Chile: CEP/ILADES Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  24. MacKellar, L. and H. Reisen (1998) ‘A Simulation Model of Global Pension Fund Investment', OECD Development Centre Technical Paper No. 136.Google Scholar
  25. McKinnon, R. and Pill, H. (1995) ‘Credible Liberalizations and International Capital Flows', mimeo, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  26. Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. and Razin, A. (1996) ‘Sustainability of Persistent Current Account Deficits', NBER Working Paper No. 5467. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  27. Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (1994) ‘The Intertemporal Approach to the Current Account', NBER Working Paper No. 4893. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  28. Razin, A. (1995) ‘The Dynamic-Optimizing Approach to Current Account', in P. Kenen (ed.), Understanding Interdependence: The Macroeconomics of the Open Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  29. Reisen, H. (1993) ‘Integation with Disinflation: Which Way?', in R. O'Brien (ed.), Finance and the International Economy: 7, The Amex Bank Review Prize Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128–145.Google Scholar
  30. Reisen, H. (1996) ‘Managing Volatile Capital Inflows: The Experience of the 1990s', Asian Development Review 14.1, 72–96.Google Scholar
  31. Reisen, H. (1998) ‘Net Capital Inflows: How Much to Accept, How Much to Resist?', in R. Glick (ed.), Managing Capital Flows and Exchange Rates: Perspectives from the Pacific Basin, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995) ‘Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1–118.Google Scholar
  33. Summers, L. (1988) ‘Tax Policy and International Competitiveness', in J.A. Frenkel (ed.), International Aspects of Fiscal Policies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Reisen
    • 1
  1. 1.OECD Development CentreParis CEDEX 16France

Personalised recommendations