Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changing Definitions of Fresh Start in U.S. Bankruptcy Law

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer bankruptcy law in the United States has been distinguished by its commitment to the fresh start concept, enabling the debtor to discharge indebtedness and begin a new economic life. In this paper recent developments respecting four important limitations on the scope of the fresh start are examined. The four limitations are: (1) the debtor must give up non-exempt property; (2) in some parts of the country debtors are effectively required to complete 3 to 5 year debt repayment plans (called Chapter 13 plans) before receiving a discharge; (3) certain debts are "excepted" from discharge; and (4) many rights of secured creditors in collateral are preserved despite discharge.

The author concludes that, with respect to the first three limitations, debtor's rights have been restricted over the past 15 years approximately. In the conclusion possible reasons for these restrictions in scope of the debtor's fresh start are discussed. The author discusses the tremendous increase in consumer bankruptcy filing rates in the United States but concludes that the best evidence indicates that increased filings are not a good reason to restrict the scope of the fresh start. He suggests that one important factor for increasing limitations on the fresh start has been a reduced political commitment to values that historically have justified the granting of a discharge to consumer debtors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Braucher, J. (1993). Lawyers and consumer protection: One code, many cultures. American Bankrupty Law Journal, 67, 501-583. Collier on bankruptcy (L. P. King, Ed.), 15th ed. (1996). New York: M. Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, D., & Buch, R. (1992). Educational debts under the bankruptcy code. Memphis State University Law Review, 22, 679-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frackowiak, D. (1995). The fallacy of conflicting theories for analyzing credit card fraud under 11 USC §523(a)(2)(A). Journal of Bankrupty Law and Practice, 4, 641-654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huls, N. et al. (1994). Overindebtedness of consumers in EC Member States: Facts and search for solutions. Bruxelles: Story-Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (1985). The fresh-start policy in bankruptcy law. Harvard Law Review, 98, 1393-1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, K. (1993). Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Eau Claire, WI: PESI Legal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, C. M. (Ed.) (1995). The 1995 bankruptcy yearbook and almanac. Boston: New Generation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Reform of Bankruptcy Laws (1973). Final report. H.R.Doc. No. 137, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess.

  • Pawlowic, D. (1995). Entitlement to interest under the bankruptcy code. Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 12, 149-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Personal bankruptcies surging as economy hums (1996). New York Times, August 25, p. 1, col. 2.

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1989). As we forgive our debtors: Bankruptcy and consumer credit in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1994). Consumer debtors ten years later: A financial comparison of consumer bankrupts 1981-1991. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 68, 121-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1997). Consumer bankruptcy in the United States: A study of alleged abuse and of local legal culture. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 223-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1996). The law of debtors and creditors: Text, cases, and problems. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W., Kurtz, J., & Calhoun, R. (1991). The implementation of Bankruptcy Code Section 707(b): The law and the reality. Cleveland State Law Review, 39, 15-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. C. (1979). A critique of the consumer credit collection system. Wisconsin Law Review, 1979, 1047-1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. C. (1985). The appropriate role of security interests in consumer transactions. Cardozo Law Review, 7, 959-1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. C. (1989). Has the time come to repeal Chapter 13? Indiana Law Journal, 65, 85-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. C. (1994). The ideal of individualized justice: Consumer bankruptcy as consumer protection, and consumer protection in consumer bankruptcy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 68, 397-417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wisconsin Law School, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    William C. Whitford

Authors
  1. William C. Whitford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitford, W.C. Changing Definitions of Fresh Start in U.S. Bankruptcy Law. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 179–198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006834100776

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006834100776

Keywords

Search

Navigation