Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The absolute and relative impact of current quality and reputation variables on consumer decisions are examined using data from the market for Bordeaux wine. The estimates indicate that a model of consumer decision making which incorporates information on reputation (past quality) and collective reputation (average group quality) rejects alternative models that include current quality. The results also indicate that reputation has a large impact on the willingness to pay of consumers, that long term reputation is considerably more important than short term quality movements, and that consumers react slowly to changes in product quality. Collective reputation is shown to have an impact on consumer willingness to pay that is as large as that of individual firm reputation. If reputation and collective reputation effects are ignored, the estimated impact of current quality and short term changes in quality on consumer behaviour are overstated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allen, F. (1984). Reputation and product quality. Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 311-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, R. B., Haulman, C. A., & Moody, Jr., C. E. (1983). Quality, price, advertising, and published quality ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 347-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arguea, N. M., & Hsiao, C. (1993). Econometric issues of estimating hedonic price functions. Journal of Econometrics, 56, 243-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • BergerD.1994.SauvignBlancsalesadisaster.LosAngelesTimes, reprinted in The Edmonton Journal, October 12, p. D8

  • Bodell, R. W., Kerton, R. R., & Schuster, R. W. (1986). Price as a signal of quality: Canada in the international context. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9, 431-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, S., & Zimmerman, M. B. (1988). Market incentives for safe commercial airline operation. American Economic Review, 78, 913-935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, M. L., Deck, L. B., & McConnell, K. E. (1988). On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 668-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, D. J. (1985). Measuring price and quality competition. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 106-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica, 49, 781-793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenson, R., Gaeth, G., & Wagner, J. (1988). Evaluating the effect of country of origin and the “Made in the USA” campaign: A conjoint approach. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 85-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. P. (1967). Quality and price considerations in rational consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 1, 13-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geistfeld, L. V. (1982). The price-quality relationship-Revisited. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 16, 334-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geistfeld, L. V. (1988). The price quality relationship: The evidence we have, the evidence we need. In: E.S. Maynes & the ACCI Research Committee (Eds.), The frontier of research in the consumer interest, pp. 143-172. Columbia, MO: American Council on Consumer Interests.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, E. (1985). Do higher prices signal higher quality? Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 209-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. G., & Orme, C. D. (1994). The sensitivity of some general checks to omitted variables in the linear model. International Economic Review, 35, 489-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, R., & Pollakowski, H. O. (1981). Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 37-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf, C.-H., & von Wersebe, B. (1994). Price, quality, and consumers' behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 17, 335-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth-Andersen, C. (1991). Quality indicators in theory and in fact. European Economic Review, 35, 1491-1505

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, G., & Peltzman, S. (1985). The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 512-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 615-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. (1994). Pinot Gris: California's next big white. Wine Spectator, 19(10), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J. E. Jr. (1992). Market segmentation by price-quality schedules: Some evidence from automobiles. Journal of Business, 65, 615-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P. (1980). Some empirical results on the nature of the hedonic price function for the urban housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 9, 47-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. G., White, H., & Davidson, R. (1983). Tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses: Some further results. Journal of Econometrics, 21, 53-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannering, F., & Winston, C. (1985). A dynamic empirical analysis of household vehicle ownership and utilization. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 215-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannering, F., & Winston, C. (1991). Brand loyalty and the decline of American automobile firms. In: Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, pp. 67-103. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R. (1984). Estimating the structural equations of implicit markets and household production functions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, 673-677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux-Berry, D. (1990). The Sotheby's guide to classic wines and their labels. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. W., & White, J. (1985). Does legal service advertising serve the public's interest? A study of lawyer ratings and advertising practices. Journal of Consumer Policy, 8, 153-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenfelt, A. R. (1950). Consumer knowledge: Its measurement and extent. Review of Economics and Statistics, 32, 300-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist, R. B. (1984). Estimating the demand for the characteristics of housing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, 394-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. D., & Zilberman, D. (1993). Hedonic estimation of quality factors affecting the farm-retail margin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 458-466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P. M. (1995). “Sweet lemons”: Illusory quality, self-deceivers, advertising, and price. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 291-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. M. (1991). Bordeaux. New York: Simon & Schuster New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. (1989). Games and information: An introduction to game theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, B. T., & Gupta, P. (1990). On the interpretation of price-quality relations. Journal of Consumer Policy, 13, 389-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesz, P. C. (1978). Price versus quality in the marketplace, 1961-1975. Journal of Retailing, 54 (4), 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesz, P. C. (1979). Price-quality correlations for packaged good products. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13, 236-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1994). The Oxford companion to wine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, W. P. (1987). The dissipation of profits by brand name investment and entry when price guarantees quality. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 797-809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanken, M. (Ed.) (1993). The Wine Spectator's ultimate guide to buying wine 1994 edition. New York: Wine Spectator Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 98, 659-679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproles, G. B. (1977). New evidence on price and product quality. Journal of Consumer Affairs , 11(1), 63-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. R., & Tschirhart, J. (1991). Hedonic prices for a nondurable good: The case of breakfast cereals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 537-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information. Marketing Science, 6, 240-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. M. (1993). The implicit market for quality: A hedonic analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 59, 648-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landon, S., Smith, C.E. The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 289–323 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006830218392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006830218392

Keywords

Navigation