Abstract
The consumer bankruptcy or, rather, consumer debt adjustment, is a fairly recent phenomenon in continental Europe. In the nineties, a number of European countries introduced judicial institutions in order to alleviate an excessive debt burden carried by consumer debtors. In addition to the court proceedings, the European jurisdictions often provide the debtor with debt counselling services, supervision, and payment requirements. In the United States, on the other hand, discharge of debt has been an established principle of bankruptcy law since the late 19th century, and bankruptcy is frequently used by consumer debtors. However, in the US, as well as in Canada, debtors are increasingly encouraged to opt for a payment plan. There seems to be a certain convergent trend between the two different legal cultures. Paradoxically, at the same time scholars have pointed out that the variance in local cultures seems to be a main factor in explanations of how debtors choose either a direct discharge or a payment plan. This finding gives us reason to consider the interplay of counselling and other pre-trial measures and its effect upon the rights and duties of debtors.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Civil Justice Review (1988). Report of the Review Body on Civil Justice. Cmnd 394. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Davies, J. E. (1986). Delegalisation of debt recovery proceedings: A socio-legal study of money advice centres and administration orders. In: I. Ramsay (Ed.), Debtors and creditors: A socio-legal perspective, pp. 182-207. Abingdon: Professional Books.
Graver, H. P. (1997). Consumer bankruptcy: A right or a privilege? The role of the courts in establishing moral standards of economic conduct. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 161-177.
Huls, N. (1997). Overindebtedness and overlegalization: Consumer bankruptcy as a field for alternative dispute resolution. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 143-159.
Huls, N. et al. (1994). Overindebtedness of consumers in the EC Member States: Facts and search for solutions. Bruxelles: Story-Scientia.
Møgelvang-Hansen, P. (1993). Adjustment of hopeless debt. In: Consumer debt in Europe-The Birmingham declaration. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Overindebtedness, Birmingham, 4th & 5th December 1992, pp. 85-91. Birmingham: Settlement.
Poppe, C. (1994). Gjeldsordningslovens første leveår (The first year of the Consumer Bankrupty Act). Oslo: The National Institute for Consumer Research. SIFO rapport 1-1994.
Ramsay, I. (1997). Models of consumer bankruptcy: Implications for research and policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 269-287.
Sullivan, T., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1989). As we forgive our debtors: Bankruptcy and consumer credit in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sullivan, T., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J.L. (1997). Consumer bankruptcy in the United States: A study of alleged abuse and of local legal culture. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 223-268.
Whitford, W.C. (1997). Changing definitions of fresh start in U.S. bankruptcy law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 179-198.
Ziegel, J.S. (1997). Canadian perspectives on the challenges of consumer bankruptcies. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 199-221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, J. Changing Directions in Consumer Bankruptcy Law and Practice in Europe and USA. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 133–142 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006829100661
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006829100661