Abstract
The article is based on a study which aimed at examining the existence and use of group actions in consumer issues in the Baltic states. It was part of a larger research project in which the same questions were studied in all Central and Eastern European countries. Besides group actions in courts, administrative group actions were also studied.
A starting point for the study was an overview of substantive consumer protection legislation in the Baltic states. In spite of the fact that there has been a rapid development in this field during recent years, the main finding was that many substantive law elements of consumers' collective interests, which in the EU Member States are often protected by different kinds of group actions, are as yet not regulated at all in the Baltic states or not regulated in a sufficiently detailed way in the Baltic states.
The study showed that several kinds of group action exist in these countries. Firstly, there are administrative group actions for injunction. They are applied mainly in cases concerning product information, product safety, and unfair competition. Secondly, a group action by a consumer organisation for injunction in a court is, in principle, possible in Estonia and Lithuania, but not in Latvia. So far, no case law exists, however. A genuine group action for compensation is not possible in the Baltic countries, but a consumer organization may represent an individual consumer or a specified group of consumers in a court and may claim compensation on their behalf. The study showed that administrative group actions are a functioning part of the present consumer protection system in these countries, whereas court actions so far exist only on paper. It also showed that in the Baltic states, procedural means are in some matters better developed than substantive consumer law, whereas in many western countries, the exact opposite is the case. The article concludes with some recommendations as to how the Baltic states could develop their consumer protection legislation.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Mikelenas, V. (1995). Recodification of civil law in the Republic of Lithuania during 1990-1994. Svensk Juristtidning, 80, 538-542.
Nehf, J. (1995). Consumer policy in Latvia. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 317-344.
Pisuke, H. (1996). Consumer protection in Estonia. In: Alexiev et al., Consumer protection in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, pp. 69-103. Louvain-la-Neuve: Centre de Droit de la Consommation.
Reich, N. (1996). Consumer protection in countries of emerging markets: The example of Russia. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 1-43.
Torgans, K. (1996). Consumer protection in Latvia. In: Alexiev et al., Consumer protection in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, pp. 143-169. Louvain-la-Neuve: Centre de Droit de la Consommatio
Viitanen, K. (1996). Consumer protection in the Republic of Lithunia. In: Alexiev et al., Consumer protection in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, pp. 171-195. Louvain-la-Neuve: Centre de Droit de la Consommation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Viitanen, K. Group Action in the Baltic States. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 353–370 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006822413725
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006822413725