Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge of likely time of ovulation and contraceptive use in unintended pregnancies

  • Published:
Advances in Contraception

Abstract

This investigation analyzed social and demographic characteristics of women having an unwanted or mistimed pregnancy (unintended pregnancies at the current time) in South America.

A sample of 5135 women having had a normal non-malformed live-born infant were interviewed immediately postpartum at 18 hospitals participating in the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (Spanish acronym: ECLAMC). Half (2568/5135 = 50%) reported that their pregnancies had been unintended, and, of those, 59.3% (1522/2568 = 59.3%) declared that they were trying to avoid conception. The latter group (n = 1522) was the main sample for this study.

Patients were asked about their knowledge of when during the menstrual cycle conception is most likely to occur, their biomedical and social characteristics, the type of contraceptive methods used, their opinion of reasons for contraceptive failure, and their reasons for not using contraceptive methods.

Women with unintended pregnancies who had not attempted to avoid conception were younger, often primigravid, less educated, and less knowledgeable concerning when during the cycle pregnancy is most likely to occur. Thus, reproductive health policies should be aimed at this target group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Long S. Unintended pregnancies and use, misuse, and discontinuation of oral contraceptives. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:355-60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Meehan TE. Use and misuse of oral contraceptives. Risk indicators for poor pill-taking and discontinuation. Contraception. 1995;51:283-8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown SS, Eisenberg L. Contraceptive knowledge and access in the best intentions. Inst Med. 1995;5:129.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams MM, Bruce FC, Shulman HB. Pregnancy planning and pre-conception counseling. The PRAMS working group. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:955-9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gadow EC, Paz JE, López-Camelo JS et al. Unintended pregnancies in women delivering at 18 South American hospitals. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1991-5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones EF, Forrest JD, Henshaw SK, Silverman J, Torres A. Unintended pregnancy, contraceptive practice and family planning services in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. 1988;20:53-67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forrest JD. Epidemiology of unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1485-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kastner LS. Ecological factors predicting adolescent contraceptive use: implication for interventions. J Adolesc Health. 1984;S(2):79-86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Price SJ, Barret G, Smith C. Use of contraception in women who present for termination of pregnancy in Inner London. Public Health. 1997;111:377-82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kohler HP. Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice. Demography. 1997;34:369-83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huerta Franco R, Díaz de León J, Malacara JM. Knowledge and attitudes toward sexuality in adolescents and their association with the family and other factors. Adolescence. 1996;31:179-91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Putter RL. Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States. Bull Pan Am Health Org. 1993;27:120-34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harlap S, Kost K, Forrest JD. Preventing Pregnancies. Protecting Health: A Look at Birth Control in the United States. New York. The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forrest JD, Singh S. The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982–1988. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990;22:206-214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grimes DA. The morbidity and mortality of pregnancy: still risky business. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1489-94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wessel H, Cnattingius S, Bergstroms. Maternal risk factors for preterm birth weight in Cape Verde. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:360-6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Wark H. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1113-17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dollberg S, Seidman DS, Armon Y. Adverse perinatal outcome in the older primipara. J Perinatol. 1996;16:93-7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kirby O, Short L, Collins J et al. School-based programs to reduce sexual risk behaviors. A review of effectiveness. Public Health Rep. 1994;109:339-60.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brown SS, Eisenberg L, eds. for the Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Unintended Pregnancy. The Best Intentions: Conclusions and Recommendations. Washington DC: National Academy Press. 1995:250-71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gadow, E., Jennings, V., López-Camelo, J. et al. Knowledge of likely time of ovulation and contraceptive use in unintended pregnancies. Advances in Contraception 15, 109–118 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006793509084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006793509084

Keywords

Navigation