Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatitis B Immunization of Healthy Elderly Adults: Relationship between Na¨ıve CD4+ T Cells and Primary Immune Response and Evaluation of GM-CSF as an Adjuvant

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to enhance the primary immune response to hepatitis B vaccine was studied in healthy elderly with young volunteers included as controls in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of GM-CSF as an immune adjuvant. Na¨ıve T-helper cells (CD4+CD45RA+) were determined at baseline. Forty-five healthy elderly (average age, 74 years) and 37 healthy young controls (average age, 28 years) were randomized. Hepatitis B vaccine was administered at 0, 1, and 6 months. GM-CSF as a single injection of either 80 μg or 250 μg with the first and second doses of hepatitis B vaccine. In this trial GM-CSF did not enhance antibody responses. However, the antibody responses were dramatically different between these two groups: 35/35 young developed a protective titer versus 19/45 elderly (P < 0.0001). In addition, the mean logarithm of anti-hepatitis B antibody level in the 35 young who completed the study was 3.17 (log mIU/ml) but only 2.21 in the 19 elderly responders (P < 0.0001). Na¨ıve T-helper cells differed significantly between the two groups: the mean percentage of CD4+CD45RA+ T cells was 47.9% versus 35.0% (P < 0.0001) in the young and elderly volunteers respectively. Na¨ıve T cells also differed significantly between elderly who did or did not respond to HBV (39.9% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.039). Using linear regression, age, and percent na¨ıve, CD4 T cells were determined to significantly influence the anti-hepatitis B antibody response, but sex and dose of GM-CSF did not. For a two-parameter model: logarithm of antibody titer = (−0.038 × age in years) + (0.031 × % na¨ıve CD4T cells) + 2.68; adjusted r2 = 0.605 and P < 0.0001. However, age had a larger effect than na¨ıve CD4 T cells, i.e., in comparing young and elderly groups the log antibody titer decreased by 1.73 due to the increase in age but only 0.40 due to the decrease in na¨ıve CD4 T cells. Thus, there was a large effect of age that could not be explained by the quantitative change in the na¨ıve T-helper cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kishimoto S, Tomino S, Mitsuya H, Fujiwara H, Tsuda H: Age-related decline in the in vitro and in vivo syntheses of anti-tetanus toxoid antibody in humans. J Immunol 125:2347–2352, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook JM, Gualde N, Hessel L, et al.: Alterations in the human immune response to the hepatitis B vaccine among the elderly. Cell Immunol 109:89–96, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mastroeni I, Vescia N, Pompa MG, Cattaruzza MS, Marini GP, Fara GM: Immune response of the elderly to rabies vaccines. Vaccine 12:518–520, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Rave S, Heijtink RA, Bakker-Bendik M, Boot J, Schalm SW: Immunogenicity of standard and low dose vaccination using yeast-derived recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen in elderly volunteers. Vaccine 12:532–534, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Paoli P, Battistin S, Santini GF: Age-related changes in human lymphocyte subsets: Progressive reduction in the CD4CD45R (suppressor inducer) population. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 48:290–296, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackola DR, Ruger JK, Miller RA: Age-associated changes in human T cell phenotype and function. Aging 6:25–34, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Utsuyama M, Hiokawa K, Kurashima C, et al.: Differential age-change in the numbers of CD41CD45RA1 and CD41CD291 T cell subsets in human peripheral blood. Mech Aging Dev 86:57–68, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cossarizza A, Ortolani C, Paganelli R, et al.: Mech Aging Dev 63:57–68, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin R, Tarr PE, Jones TC: Present status of the use of cytokines as adjuvants with vaccines to protect against infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 21:1439–1449, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tarr PE, Lin R, Mueller EA, Kovarik JM, Guillaume M, Jones TC: Evaluation of tolerability and antibody response after recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGMCSF) and a single dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine 14:1199–1204, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Disis ML, Bernhard H, Shiota FM, et al.: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: An effective adjuvant for protein and peptide-based vaccines. Blood 88:202–210, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer HG, Opel B, Reske K, Reske-Kunz AB: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-cultured bone marrowderived macrophages reveal accessory cell function and synthesis of MHC class II determinants in the absence of external stimuli. Eur J Immunol 18:1151–1158, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen CP, Ritchie SC, Hendrix R, et al.: Regulation of immunostimulatory function and costimulatory molecule (B7–1 and B7–2) expression on murine dendritic cells. J Immunol 152:5208–5219, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Markowicz S, Engleman EG: Granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor promotes differentiation and survival of human peripheral blood dendritic cells in vitro. J Clin Invest 85:955–961, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steinman RM: The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol 9:271–296, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips N, Jacobs S, Stoller R, Earle M, Przepiorka D, Shadduck RK: Effect of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on myelopoiesis in patients with refractory metastatic carcinoma. Blood 74:26–34, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulz G, Frisch J, Greifenberg B, Nicolay U, Oster W: New therapeutic modalities for the clinical use of rhGM-CSF in patients with malignancies. Am J Clin Oncol 14 Suppl 1:S19–26, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bodey GP, Anaissie E, Gutterman J, Vadhan-Raj S: Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant treatment in neutropenic patients with bacterial and fungal infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13 Suppl 2:S18–22, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mamounas EP, Anderson S, Wickerham DL, et al.: The efficacy of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in permitting the administration of higher doses of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination. An NSABP pilot study in patients with metastatic or high-risk primary breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. Am J Clin Oncol 17:374–381, discussion 382, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassan HT, Zander AR: Thrombocytopenia after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: An unresolved problem and possible approaches to resolve it. Journal of Hematotherapy 5:407–414, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hebert JC, O'Reilly M: Granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor (GM-CSF) enhances pulmonary defenses against pneumococcal infections after splenectomy. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 41:663–666, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bodey GP, Anaissie E, Gutterman J, Vadhan-Raj S: Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant therapy for fungal infection in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 17:705–707, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasan MS, Agosti JM, Reynolds KK, Tanzman E, Treanor JJ, Evans TG: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant for hepatitis B vaccination in healthy adults. J Infect Dis 180:2023–2026, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hess G, Kreiter F, Kosters W, Deusch K: The effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on hepatitis B vaccination in haemodialysis patients. J Viral Hepatitis 3:149–153, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  25. Samanci A, Yi Q, Fagerberg J, Strigard K, Smith G, Ruden U, Wahren B, Mellstedt H: Pharmacological administration of granulocyte/ macrophage-colony-stimulating factor is of significant importance for the induction of a strong humoral and cellular response in patients immunized with recombinant carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Immunol Immunother 47(3):131–142, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weng NP, Levine BL, June CH, Hodes RJ: Human naive and memory T lymphocytes differ in telomeric length and replicative potential. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 92:11091–11094, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kong FK, Chen CL, Six A, Hockett RD, Cooper MD: T cell receptor gene deletion circles identify recent thymic emigrants in the peripheral T cell pool. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:1536–1540, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spencer NF, Poynter ME, Im SY, Daynes RA: Constitutive activation of NF-kappa B in an animal model of aging. Int Immunol 9:1581–1588, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sunderkotter C, Kalden H, Luger TA: Aging and the skin immune system. Arch Dermatol 133:1256–1262, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steger MM, Maczek C, Grubeck-Loebenstein B: Morphologically and functionally intact dendritic cells can be derived from the peripheral blood of aged individuals. Clin Exp Immunol 105:544–550, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Looney, R.J., Hasan, M.S., Coffin, D. et al. Hepatitis B Immunization of Healthy Elderly Adults: Relationship between Na¨ıve CD4+ T Cells and Primary Immune Response and Evaluation of GM-CSF as an Adjuvant. J Clin Immunol 21, 30–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006736931381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006736931381

Navigation