Skip to main content
Log in

A new millennium—so what's new?

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Flawn, P.T. 1966 Mineral resources: geology, engineering, economics, politics, law. Rand McNally: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, S.E. 1976Our finite mineral resources. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, N. 1988 Atlas of world issues. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. ed. 1994 The gaia atlas of planet management. Gaia Books: Stroud, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović, N., Grubler, A. and McDonald, A. eds. 1998 v Global energy perspectives. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehrson, E.W. 1951 Estimates of selected world mineral supplies by cost range. Proceedings of the United Nations Scientific Conference: The Conserätion and Utilization of Resources, 2, Mineral Resources.

  • Potter, J.F. 1993 We have a problem. The Environmentalist, 13(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellwood, B., Bentley, R. and Coleman, M. 1997 Future prospects for conventional oil supplies. Petroleum Review, 51, 559–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, P. 1995 Physical resources: an introduction. The Open University: Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, Q.H. and Moran, W. 1981 Geography: a study of its physical elements. Oxford University Press: Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potter, J.F. A new millennium—so what's new?. The Environmentalist 20, 5–7 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006690107769

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006690107769

Keywords

Navigation