Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the second most commonly used contraceptive method in the world. A number of mechanisms have been proposed by which IUDs could interfere with reproductive processes. In this study, the relationship between intrauterine devices and the risk of antisperm antibody (ASA) production in the absence of prior sensitization was investigated. Sixty-two IUD users (group 1) and 42 women with no contraceptive use as a control group (group 2) were included in the study. Six months after the IUD insertion, 4 women in group 1 and 2 women in group 2 with lower genital tract infections were excluded from the study. The sera of the remaining 58 women in group 1 and 40 women in group 2 were evaluated again for the presence of ASA. Twelve patients (20.7%) in group 1 and 12 patients (30.0%) in group 2 had ASA positivity. When we compared the ASA levels in the IUD group with those in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). In summary, our data proved that copper-containing intrauterine devices in the absence of prior sensitization do not significantly affect immunity to sperm in sera of women.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bronson R, Cooper G, Rosenfeld D. Sperm antibodies: their role in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:171-81.
Bronson RA. Antisperm antibodies — diagnosis and treatment. In: Hammond MG, Talbert LM, eds. Infertility. A Practical Guide for the Physician, 3rd edn. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1992:84-101.
Naz RK. Sperm surface antigens involved in mammalian fertilization: their role in contraceptive vaccine development for humans. Curr Opin Immunol. 1990;2:748-51.
Diekman AB, Herr JC. Sperm antigens and their use in the development of an immunocontraceptive. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:111-17.
Marshburn PB, Kutteh WH. The role of antisperm antibodies in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:799-811.
Dervişoğlu AA. Family planning. In: Ministry of Health (Department of Mother and Child Health Care and Family Planning), Hacettepe Institute of Population Studies and Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): Turkish Population and Health Survey. Maryland: Macro International Inc. 1993:37-54.
Alvarez F, Brache V, Fernandez E et al. New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:768-73.
World Health Organization. Improving Access to Quality Care in Family Planning: Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. Geneva: WHO. 1996.
D'Cruz OJ, Haas GG, Wang B, DeBault LE. Activation of human complement by IgG antisperm antibody and the demonstration of C3 and C5b-9-mediated immune injury to human sperm. J Immunol. 1991;146:611-20.
Kutteh WH, Hatch KD, Blackwell RE, Mestecky J. Secretory immune system of the female reproductive tract. I. Immunoglobulin and secretory component-containing cells. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:56-60.
Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF et al. Williams Obstetrics, 20th edn. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1997.
Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, 5th edn. Maryland: Williams and Wilkins, 1994.
Cunningham DS, Fulgham DL, Rayl DL, Hansen KA, Alexander NJ. Antisperm antibodies to sperm surface antigens in women with genital tract infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:791-6.
Kutteh WH, Blackwell RE, Gore H, Kutteh CC, Carr BR, Mestecky J. Secretory immune system of the female reproductive tract. II. Local immune system in normal and infected fallopian tube. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:51-5.
Goldberg JM, Haering PL, Friedman CI, Dodds WG, Kim MH. Antisperm antibodies in women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:65-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vural, B., Vural, F., Çorakçi (1), A. et al. Does the intrauterine device carry the risk of immunity to sperm?. Advances in Contraception 15, 29–35 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006679427572
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006679427572