Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental issue area and game theory

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of international cultural, political, social, military, scientific, environmental and economic events has never been more vividly felt than today and the ‘challenge of global change’ has been created. Today there are many pressing regional and global problems. The planet is under stress and so are various scientific paradigms. To solve the new problems, international multilateral action is needed and increasingly sought. Mutual and not sporadic cooperation is the most prudent policy, the most effective means to attain set environmental goals such as clean air, clean water and clean soil. As to cooperation, national actions taken by state authorities cannot abolish any of these problems, but regional or preferably global, international multilateral action must be taken to meet the new demands. Responsibility for future generations is the key. Which is preferred: growth at any cost with widespread ecological destruction or sustainable development with cleaner water, air and environment? What is prudent policy? Cooperation or competition? Do we need long-term planning instead of short-term planning and gains? These are the key questions which this paper seeks to answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, V.K. and Allan, P. (1992) Cold War end games. In The end of the Cold War. Evaluating theories of international relations (P. Allan and K. Goldmann, eds) pp. 27–8 and 34-5. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1985) Superpower Games. Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Lalman, D. (1992) War and Reason. Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (1991) People, State and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Jones, C. and Little, R. (eds) (1993) The Logic of Anarchy. Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L.K. (1990) International Environmental Policy. Emergence and Dimensions, 2nd edn. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, J.A. and Falk, K. (1992) The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Al dershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1991) Negotiating Across Cultures. Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, J.E. and Pfaltzgra., R.L. (1981) Contending Theories of International Relations: A comprehensive Survey, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J (ed) (1986) Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, M. (1994) World Views and Theories of International Relations. New York: St Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, M.I. (1996) Political Geography, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (1996) Annual Report.

  • Hurrel, A. (1995) International political theory and the global environment. In International relations theory today. (K. Booth and S. Smith, eds) p. 149. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (1993) Preparing for the Twenty-First Century. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1989) Power and Interdependence, 2nd edn. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R.D. (1996) Kulttuurikolareita. Helsinki: Otava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luard, E. (1990) The Globalization of Politics. The Changed Focus of Political Action in the Modern World. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.M. and Romano, A.T. (1992) Multinational Crime. Terrorism, Espionage, Drug & Arms Traffcking. New-bury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.T. (1989) Redefining security. Foreign Affairs 68(2), 171–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, M. (1992) Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, W.C. and Lee, J.R. (eds) (1994) Theory and Practice of International Relations, 9th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. and Toffler, H. (1994) War and Anti-war. Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century. London: Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasek, R.D. (1987) The international drug issues as an illustration of complex interdependency theory. Int. Third World Studies J. Rev. 2(1), 15–16 and 28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuismin, H.O. Environmental issue area and game theory. The Environmentalist 18, 77–86 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006666223200

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006666223200

Keywords

Navigation