Abstract
The impact of international cultural, political, social, military, scientific, environmental and economic events has never been more vividly felt than today and the ‘challenge of global change’ has been created. Today there are many pressing regional and global problems. The planet is under stress and so are various scientific paradigms. To solve the new problems, international multilateral action is needed and increasingly sought. Mutual and not sporadic cooperation is the most prudent policy, the most effective means to attain set environmental goals such as clean air, clean water and clean soil. As to cooperation, national actions taken by state authorities cannot abolish any of these problems, but regional or preferably global, international multilateral action must be taken to meet the new demands. Responsibility for future generations is the key. Which is preferred: growth at any cost with widespread ecological destruction or sustainable development with cleaner water, air and environment? What is prudent policy? Cooperation or competition? Do we need long-term planning instead of short-term planning and gains? These are the key questions which this paper seeks to answer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal, V.K. and Allan, P. (1992) Cold War end games. In The end of the Cold War. Evaluating theories of international relations (P. Allan and K. Goldmann, eds) pp. 27–8 and 34-5. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijho.
Brams, S.J. (1985) Superpower Games. Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Lalman, D. (1992) War and Reason. Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Buzan, B. (1991) People, State and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Buzan, B., Jones, C. and Little, R. (eds) (1993) The Logic of Anarchy. Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Caldwell, L.K. (1990) International Environmental Policy. Emergence and Dimensions, 2nd edn. Durham: Duke University Press.
Camilleri, J.A. and Falk, K. (1992) The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Al dershot: Edward Elgar.
Cohen, R. (1991) Negotiating Across Cultures. Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Dougherty, J.E. and Pfaltzgra., R.L. (1981) Contending Theories of International Relations: A comprehensive Survey, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harper & Row.
Elster, J (ed) (1986) Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gabriel, M. (1994) World Views and Theories of International Relations. New York: St Martin's.
Glassner, M.I. (1996) Political Geography, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
Greenpeace (1996) Annual Report.
Hurrel, A. (1995) International political theory and the global environment. In International relations theory today. (K. Booth and S. Smith, eds) p. 149. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kennedy, P. (1993) Preparing for the Twenty-First Century. London: Harper Collins.
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1989) Power and Interdependence, 2nd edn. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
Lewis, R.D. (1996) Kulttuurikolareita. Helsinki: Otava.
Luard, E. (1990) The Globalization of Politics. The Changed Focus of Political Action in the Modern World. London: MacMillan.
Martin, J.M. and Romano, A.T. (1992) Multinational Crime. Terrorism, Espionage, Drug & Arms Traffcking. New-bury Park: Sage.
Mathews, J.T. (1989) Redefining security. Foreign Affairs 68(2), 171–7.
Nicholson, M. (1992) Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, W.C. and Lee, J.R. (eds) (1994) Theory and Practice of International Relations, 9th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: MacMillan.
Toffler, A. and Toffler, H. (1994) War and Anti-war. Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century. London: Warner.
Tomasek, R.D. (1987) The international drug issues as an illustration of complex interdependency theory. Int. Third World Studies J. Rev. 2(1), 15–16 and 28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuismin, H.O. Environmental issue area and game theory. The Environmentalist 18, 77–86 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006666223200
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006666223200