Skip to main content
Log in

Election-Day Registration and Turnout Inequality

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many researchers blame voter registration requirements for inequalities in turnout rates across various groups in U.S. society. The number of states with election-day registration (EDR) of voters doubled between the 1990 and 1994 elections, providing a unique opportunity to examine its impact on turnout inequality across demographic groups. The adoption of EDR is found to be associated with large and significant improvements in the turnout rates of young persons relative to older persons, and of recent movers relative to nonmovers. Turnout inequality by income class also declines with EDR adoption, but not by a significant amount in multivariate tests. The adoption of EDR does not improve equality of representation across educational levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Avey, Michael J. (1989). The Demobilization of the American Voter: A Comprehensive Theory of Voter Turnout. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, Jerry W. and Gilchrist, Jack (1993). Suppose they held an election and almost everybody came! PS: Political Science and Politics 26(1): 695–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, Mark J. (1994). The impact of allowing day of registration voting on turnout in U.S. elections from 1960 to 1992. American Politics Quarterly 22(1): 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Joseph (1929). Registration of Voters in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highton, Benjamin (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics 59(2): 565–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highton, Benjamin and Wolfinger, Raymond (1998). Estimating the effects of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. Political Behavior 20(2): 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Kim Quaile and Leighley, Jan E. (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science 36(2): 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Robert A., Brown, Robert D. and Gerald C. Wright (1998). Registration, turnout, and the electoral representativeness of U.S. state electorates. American Politics Quarterly 26(3): 259–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleppner, Paul (1982). Who Voted? New York: Praeger. Knack, Stephen (forthcoming). Election-day registration: The second wave. American Politics Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, Stephen (1995). Does motor voter work? Journal of Politics 57(3): 796–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, Stephen and White, James (1998). Did states’ motor voter programs help the democrats? American Politics Quarterly 26(3): 344–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan and Nagler, Jonathan (1992). Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review 86(3): 725–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review 91(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Glenn E. and Wlezian, Christopher (1995). The impact of legal constraints on voter registration, turnout, and the composition of the American electorate. Political Behavior 17(2): 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagler, Jonathan (1994). Scobit: An alternative estimator to logit and tobit. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 230–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagler, Jonathan (1991). The effect of registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout. American Political Science Review 85(4): 1393–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A. (1989). Government statistics and conflicting explanations of nonvoting. PS: Political Science and Politics 22(3): 580–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A. (1988). Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review 80(1): 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhine, Staci (1995). Registration reform and turnout change in the American states. American Politics Quarterly 23(4): 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Glass, David P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review 81(1): 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, Ruy A. (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Hal (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980). Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knack, S., White, J. Election-Day Registration and Turnout Inequality. Political Behavior 22, 29–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006638400784

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006638400784

Keywords

Navigation