Political Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

The Spirit of Capitalism? Religious Doctrine, Values, and Economic Attitude Constructs

  • David C. Barker
  • Christopher Jan Carman


This article examines the relationship between conservative Protestant doctrine and economic policy attitudes. Building upon Weber's (1930) classic (and controversial) thesis that Calvinist thought inspired the “capitalist spirit,” we posit that the individualistic theology of fundamentalists, evangelicals, and charismatics often engenders political preferences for individualistic economic policies. We test this hypothesis by (1) performing a series of cross-sectional ordered probit analyses to understand the independent degree of association between doctrinal belief and economic attitudes toward taxing, spending, and the role of government, (2) creating and testing a structural equation model to assess various hypothesized paths of influence, and finally, (3) using 1994–96 NES panel data to assess the degree to which changes in an individual's doctrinal beliefs produce changes in his or her economic attitudes. Results lend substantial support to the efficacy of Weber's thesis, and point to religious belief as one exogenous agent of core political values.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bellah, R. N., R. Madsen, W. N. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S. M. Tipton (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bawer, Bruce (1997). Stealing Jesus: How Fundamentalism Betrays Christianity. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, Edmund (1910). Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Everyman's Library (original work published in 1790).Google Scholar
  4. Cialdini, R. B., M. R. Trost, and J. T. Newsom (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 318–328.Google Scholar
  5. Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. and R. H. Fazio (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 229–266. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Corbett, Michael and Julia Mitchell Corbett (1999). Politics and Religion in the United States. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  8. Dionne, E. J. Jr., and John J. Dilulio, Jr. (1999). What's God got to do with the American experiment? Brookings Review Spring: 4–9.Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, Stanley (1983). Economic individualism in American public opinion. American Politics Quarterly 11: 3–29.Google Scholar
  10. Feldman, Stanley (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science 32: 416–440.Google Scholar
  11. Feldman, Stanley and John Zaller (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the Welfare State. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268–307.Google Scholar
  12. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  13. Finkel, Steven E. (1995). Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Green, John C., James L. Guth, Corwin E. Smidt, and Lyman A. Kellstedt (1996). Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  15. Green, Robert W. (1959). Protestantism and Capitalism: The Weber Thesis and Its Critics. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, William H. (1997). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Gurin, P., G. Gurin, R. Lao, and M. Beattie (1969). Internal-external control in the motivational dynamics of Negro youth. Journal of Social Issues 25: 29–58.Google Scholar
  18. Guth, James L., John C. Green, Lyman A. Kellstedt, and Corwin E. Smidt (1995). Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science 39: 364–382.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, James Davison (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Huntington, Samuel P. (1981). American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hurwitz, John and Mark A. Peffley (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? American Political Science Review 81: 1099–1120.Google Scholar
  22. Hurwitz, John, Mark Peffley, and M. A. Seligson (1993). Foreign policy belief systems in comparative perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly 37: 245–270.Google Scholar
  23. Jelen, Ted G. (1991). The Political Mobilization of Religious Beliefs. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. Jelen, Ted G. (1995). Religion and the American political culture: Alternative models of citizenship and discipleship. Sociology of Religion 56: 271–284.Google Scholar
  25. Jorstad, Erling (1993). New generation of preachers guiding televangelism in the 1990s. Religion Watch 9: 3–4.Google Scholar
  26. Kellstedt, Lyman (1989). The meaning and measurement of evangelicalism: Problems and prospects. In Ted G. Jelen (ed.), Religion and Political Behavior in the United States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Kellstedt, Lyman and John C. Green (1993). Knowing God's many people: Denominational preference and political behavior. In David C. Leege and Lyman A. Kellstedt (eds.), Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, pp. 53–71. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  28. Kellstedt, Lyman A. and Corwin E. Smidt (1993). Doctrinal beliefs and political behavior: Views of the Bible. In David C. Leege and Lyman A. Kellstedt (eds.), Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, pp. 177–198. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  29. Kellstedt, Lyman A., John C. Green, James L. Guth, and Corwin E. Smidt (1994). Religious voting blocs in the 1992 election: The year of the evangelical? Sociology of Religion 55: 307–326.Google Scholar
  30. Kinder, Donald (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Kinder, Donald R. and Lynn M. Sanders (1996). Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action, pp. 388–433. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kluegel, J. R. and E. R. Smith (1986). Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views about What Is and What Ought To Be. New York: A. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Kung, Hans (1996). Christianity: Essence, History, and Future. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  35. Leege, David C. (1996). Religiosity measures in the national election studies: A guide to their use, Part 1. Votes and Opinions (Newsletter of the Electoral Behavior Section of the American Political Science Association), pp. 6–9, 27–30.Google Scholar
  36. Leege, David C. and Lyman A. Kellstedt (1993). Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Armonk, New York: M.E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindsey, Hal (1970). The Late Great Planet Earth. Zondervan.Google Scholar
  38. Lindsey, Hal (1994). Planet Earth—2000 A.D. Western Front.Google Scholar
  39. Lowi, Theodore J. (1995). The End of the Republican Era. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  40. Marsden, George M. (1991). Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism. New York: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  41. McClosky, Herbert and John Zaller (1984). The American Ethos. Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Miranda, Jose Porfirio (1974). Marx and the Bible: A Critique of the Philosophy of Oppression. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  43. Nunn, Clyde Z., Harry J. Crockett, Jr., and J. Allen Williams, Jr. (1978). Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Pelikan, Jaroslav (1989). The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Petty, Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener (1998). Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Pyle, R. E. (1993). Faith and commitment to the poor: Theological orientation and support for government assistance measures. Sociology of Religion 54: 4 385–401.Google Scholar
  47. Reed, Ralph (1994). Politically Incorrect: The Emerging Faith Factor in American Politics. Dallas: Word Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Robertson, Pat (1994). The Collected Works of Pat Robertson. Inspirational Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenstone, Steven J., Donald R. Kinder, Warren E. Miller, and the National Election Studies. National Election Studies, 1996: Pre-and Post-Election Study [dataset]. 3rd release. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor], 1998.Google Scholar
  51. Sears, David O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In Phyllis A. Katz and Dalmas A. Taylor (eds.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy. New York and London: Plenum.Google Scholar
  52. Scofield, C. I. (1984). The Scofield Reference Bible. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Smidt, Corwin (1989). Identifying evangelical respondents. In Ted G. Jelen (ed.), Religion and Political Behavior in the United States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  54. Smidt, Corwin and Paul Kellstedt (1992). Evangelicals in the post-Reagan era: An analysis of evangelical voters in the 1988 presidential election. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31: 330–338.Google Scholar
  55. Stark, R. and C. Y. Glock (1968). American Piety. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stoker, Laura (1992). Interests and ethics in politics. American Political Science Review 86: 369–380.Google Scholar
  57. Stoker, Laura, (in press). Political value judgments. In James Kuklinski (ed.), Political Values and Political Psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tamney, Joseph B., Ronald Burton, and Stephen D. Johnson (1989). Fundamentalism and economic restructuring. In Ted G. Jelen (ed.), Religion and Political Behavior in the United States, pp. 67–82. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  59. Tawney, R. H. (1926). Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  60. Tetlock, Philip E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 819–827.Google Scholar
  61. Verba, Sidney and G. R. Orren (1985). Equality in America: The View from the Top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wallis, Jim (1995). The Soul of Politics. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  63. Weber, Max (1971). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  64. Wilcox, Clyde (1996). Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wildavsky, Aaron (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review 81: 3–22.Google Scholar
  66. Will, J. A. and J. K. Cochran (1995). God helps those who help themselves? The effects of religious affiliation, religiosity, and deservedness on generosity toward the poor. Sociology of Religion 56: 3327–3338Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Barker
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher Jan Carman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburgh
  2. 2.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations