Skip to main content
Log in

Relative Permeability Analysis of Tube Bundle Models

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analytical solution for calculating two-phase immiscible flow through a bundle of parallel capillary tubes of uniform diametral probability distribution is developed and employed to calculate the relative permeabilities of both phases. Also, expressions for calculating two-phase flow through bundles of serial tubes (tubes in which the diameter varies along the direction of flow) are obtained and utilized to study relative permeability characteristics using a lognormal tube diameter distribution. The effect of viscosity ratio on conventional relative permeability was investigated and it was found to have a significant effect for both the parallel and serial tube models. General agreement was observed between trends of relative permeability ratios found in this work and those from experimental results of Singhal et al. (1976) using porous media consisting of mixtures of Teflon powder and glass beads. It was concluded that neglecting the difference between the average pressure of the non-wetting phase and the average pressure of the wetting phase (the macro-scale capillary pressure) – a necessary assumption underlying the popular analysis methods of Johnson et al. (1959) and Jones and Roszelle (1978) – was responsible for the disparity in the relative permeability curves for various viscosity ratios. The methods therefore do not account for non-local viscous effects when applied to tube bundle models. It was contended that average pressure differences between two immiscible phases can arise from either capillary interfaces (micro-scale capillary pressures) or due to disparate pressure gradients that are maintained for a flow of two fluids of viscosity ratio that is different from unity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blunt, M. and King, P.: 1991, Relative permeabilities from two-and three-dimensional pore-scale network modelling, Transport in Porous Media 6, 407–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, S. and Blunt, M.: 1992, Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media, Phys. Rev. A 46(4), 2004–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, S. E. and Leverett, M. C.: 1942, Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands, Petrol. Trans. AIME 146, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, R., Koplik, J., Lerman, K. and Willemsen, J. F.: 1982, Capillary displacement and percolation in porous media, J. Fluid. Mech. 119, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzis, I. and Dullien, F. A. L.: 1977, Modelling pore structure by 2-D and 3-D networks with application to sandstones, J. Can. Petrol. Tech. 16(1), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, G. N. and Payatakes, A. C.: 1996, Network simulation of steady-state two-phase flow in consolidated porous media, AIChE J. 42(2), 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, E. C., Lorenz, P. B. and Thomas, R. D.: 1966, The effects of viscosity and wettability on oil and water relative permeabilities, Soc. Petrol. Engng. 1562.

  • Downie, J. and Crane, F. E.: 1961, Effect of viscosity on relative permeability, Soc. Petrol. Engng. J. 1, 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatt, I.: 1956, The network model of porous media (in three parts), Petrol. Trans. AIME 207, 144–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impey, M. D., Grindrod, P., Takase, H. and Worgan, K. J.: 1997, A capillary network model for gas migration in low-permeability media, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57(3), 597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. F., Bossler, D. P. and Naumann, V. O.: 1959, Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments, Petrol. Trans. AIME 216, 370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. C. and Roszelle, W. O.: 1978, Graphical techniques for determining relative permeability from displacement experiments, J. Petrol. Tech. (May), 807–817.

  • Leverett, M. C.: 1939, Flow of oil-water mixtures through unconsolidated sands, Petrol. Trans. AIME 132, 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverett, M. C.: 1941, Capillary behavior in porous solids, Petrol. Trans. AIME 142, 152–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskat, M. and Meres, M. W.: 1936, The flow of heterogeneous fluids through porous media, Physics 7, 346–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odeh, A. S.: 1959, Effect of viscosity ratio on relative permeability, Petrol. Trans. AIME 216, 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger, A. E.: 1953, Theoretical models of porous matter, Producers Monthly (August), 17–23.

  • Singhal, A. K., Mukherjee, D. P. and Somerton, W. H.: 1976, Effect of heterogeneous wettability on flow of fluids through porous media, J. Can. Petrol. Tech. 15(3), 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, R. D. and Botset, H. G.: 1936, The flow of gas-liquid mixtures through unconsolidated sands, Physics 7, 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuster, S. T.: 1951, Theoretical considerations of multiphase flow in idealized capillary systems, In: Proc. of the 3rd World Petroleum Congress, Section II, The Hague, pp. 437–445.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartley, J.T., Ruth, D.W. Relative Permeability Analysis of Tube Bundle Models. Transport in Porous Media 36, 161–188 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006575231732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006575231732

Navigation