Skip to main content
Log in

Light, soil, and seedling characteristics associated with varying levels of competition in a red pine plantation

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) seedlings growing under differing levels of competition were evaluated during the fifth growing season following planting, and placed into low, moderate, or high tree classes, as a function of levels of competing vegetation. Tree growth, moisture status, and nutrition were monitored over the growing season. Additionally, site characteristics such as soil temperature and moisture, inorganic nitrogen concentration, mineralized soil nitrogen, and light were measured. Red pine seedlings growing under low competition had an absolute volume growth increase of 795% over the seedlings growing under the heaviest competition. The associated relative volume growth increase during the fifth growing season was 44%. Discriminant analysis was used to describe three classes of trees representing low, moderate, and high levels of competition. Trees growing under low competition had longer and heavier needles, but generally lower nutrient concentrations. Pre-dawn plant moisture status did not vary among competition levels. Soil variables indicated that, in general, the trees growing under low competition occupied warmer, drier, and less fertile microsites, as inorganic soil N and mean monthly mineralized NO3-N and NH4>-N tended to be lower on these microsites. The suite of independent variables was effective in classifying the model data into three tree competition classes, with percent correct classifications of 92, 75, and 100 for low (tree class one), moderate (tree class two), and heavy (tree class three) competition, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alban, D. H. 1984. Red pine site evaluation based on tree growth and soils, pp. 79–100. In: Marty, R. (Ed) Managing Red Pine, Proc., Society of American Foresters Region V Tech. Conference. SAF Pub. 85–02. Marquette, MI.

  • Armson, K. A. and van den Driessche, R. 1959. Natural root grafts in red pine (Pinus resinosaAit.). Forest. Chron. 35: 232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, J. R. 1984. Red Pine Plantation Management in the Lake States: A Review. Univ. of Michigan IFSIM Pub. No. 3. Ann Arbor, MI. 27 pp.

  • Binkley, D., Aber, J., Pastor, J. and Nadelhoffer, K. 1986. Nitrogen availability in some Wisconsin forests: Comparisons of resin bags and on-site incubations. Biol. Fert. Soils 2: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, D. G. 1986. A competition index for predicting the vigour of planted Douglas-fir in southwestern British Columbia. Can. Jour. For. Res. 16: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, D. G. 1990. Growth analysis of responses by planted white pine and white spruce to changes in soil temperature, fertility, and brush competition. Forest Ecol. Manage. 30: 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. 1982. Nitrogen - total, pp. 643–698. In: Page, A. L. et al. (Eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy No. 9, Part 2. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, P. J. 1993. Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition. Can. Jour.For. Res. 23: 2141–2152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. C. and Newton, M. 1986. Nutrient,moisture, and light relations in 5-year-old Douglas-fir plantations under variable competition. Can. Jour. For. Res. 16: 727–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. W. 1941. The root system of red pine saplings. Jour. Forest. 39: 468–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierauf, T. A. 1990. Loblolly Pine Release Study. Virginia Dept. of Forestry Occasional Rep. 89. Charlottesville, VA. 12 pp.

  • Elliott, K. J. and White, A. S. 1994. Effects of light, nitrogen, and phosphorus on red pine seedling growth and nutrient use efficiency. For. Sci. 40: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. 1987. Evaluation of herbicides for site preparation in central Wisconsin. North.Jour. Appl. Forest. 4: 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. 1994. The Lake States region, pp. 81–128. In: Barrett, J. W. (Ed) Regional Silviculture of the United States. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. and Haag, C. L. 1984. Sample size for evaluating treatment effects on red pine seedlings. Tree Planters' Notes 35: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. and Haag, C. L. 1985. Predicting the recovery of red pine stump-root biomass.North. Jour. Appl. Forest. 2: 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E., Lindow, S. G. and Rogers, R. 1995. An approach to assessing competition in young red pine plantations. North. Jour. Appl. Forest. 12: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, D. R. and Nelson, D. W. 1982. Nitrogen - inorganic forms, pp. 643–698. In: Page, A. L. et al. (Eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy No. 9, Part 2. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotar, J. and Coffman, M. S. 1984. Site selection based on ecosystem classification, pp. 101–108. In: Marty, R. (Ed) Managing Red Pine. Proc., Society of American Foresters Region V Tech. Conference. SAF Pub. 85–02. Marquette, MI.

  • Lambert, J. L., Boyle, J. R. and Gardner, W. R. 1972. The growth response of a young pine plantation to weed removal. Can. Jour. For. Res. 2: 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, A. L. 1973. Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing forests, pp. 427–454. In: Walsh, L. M. and Beaton, J. D. (Eds) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegel, E. A., Simson, C. R. and Schulte, E. E. 1980. Wisconsin Procedure for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis, and Feed and Forage analysis. Dept. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI. 51 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindow, S. G., Johnson, J. E. and Houghton, J. E. 1989. Effects of V-Plow Machine Planting on the Distribution of Soil Nutrients. Univ. of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Forest. Res. Rep. 89–03. Stevens Point, WI. 7 pp.

  • Raile, G. K. 1984. The Lake States red pine resource, pp. 6–20. In: Marty, R. (Ed) Managing Red Pine. Proc., Society of American Foresters Region V Tech. Conference. SAF Pub. 85–02. Marquette, MI.

  • Reed, D. D., Mroz, G. D., Leichty, H. O., Jones, E. A., Cattelino, P. J., Balster, N. J. and Zhang, Y. 1995. Above-and below-ground biomass of precompetitive red pine in northern Michigan. Can. Jour. For. Res. 25: 1064–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strothman, R. O. 1967. The influence of light and moisture on the growth of red pine seedlings in Minnesota. For. Sci. 13: 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucoff, E. and Hong, S. G. 1974. Effects of thinning on needle water potential in red pine. For. Sci. 20: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttech, P. R. and Stier, J. C. 1986. Development Potential of Wisconsin's Red Pine Resource. Forest Resource Analysis No. 5, Pub. R3373. Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 16 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. S. and Elliott, K. J. 1992. Predicting the effects of hardwood competition on red pine seedling growth. Can. Jour. For. Res. 22: 1510–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, S. A., Iyer, J. G., Tanzer, C., Troutmann, W. L. and Watterson, K. G. 1965. Growth of Wisconsin Coniferous Plantations in Relation to Soils. Univ. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 262. Madison, WI. 81 pp.

  • Zutter, B. R., Glover, G. R. and Dickens, D. F. 1984. Competing Vegetation Assessment Systems in Young Southern Pine Plantations. Auburn Univ. Silv. Herbicide Coop. Res. Note No. 84–12. 8 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J.E., Lindow, S.G. & Rogers, R. Light, soil, and seedling characteristics associated with varying levels of competition in a red pine plantation. New Forests 15, 23–36 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006571130280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006571130280

Navigation