Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pocket gophers, bracken fern, and western coneflower on planted conifers in northern Idaho – an update and two more species

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grand Fir Mosaic forests innorthern Idaho are difficult to regenerate afternatural or human-caused disturbances. Sparseconifer regeneration appears to be associated withhigh populations of northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) plus expansion by bracken fern(Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn) and invasionof western coneflower (Rudbeckia occidentalisNutt.). This report updates an earlier study(Ferguson and Adams 1994) that quantified theeffects of four treatments on survival and growth ofplanted conifers: unweeded with gophers, weeded withgophers, unweeded without gophers, and weededwithout gophers. Weeding removed only bracken fernand western coneflower. Subalpine fir (Abieslasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.), grand fir (Abiesgrandis (Dougl.) Lindl.), and western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) had over 80% mortalityfrom pocket gophers and other causes. Lodgepolepine (Pinus contorta var. latifoliaEngelm.) had 49.2% mortality from pocket gophersand 6.8% mortality from other causes, but snowdamage is a problem for lodgepole pine. Engelmannspruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.)had 42.2% gopher-caused mortality and 8.4%mortality from other causes. Spruce suffered littletop damage from snowpacks and was stout enough towithstand senescing bracken fern fronds. Westernwhite pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.) had only24.1% mortality from pocket gophers after 4 years,and only 11.8% of the white pine died from causesother than gophers. Of the mortality caused bypocket gophers, 76.8% occurred the first summer andnext two winters after planting. The recommendedspecies for reforestation are Engelmann spruce andwhite pine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cooper, S.V., Neiman, K.E. and Roberts, D.W. 1991. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation. USDA Forest Serv., Intermountain Research Sta., Ogden, Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-236. 143 p.

  • Chase, J.D., Howard, W.E. and Roseberry, J.T. 1982. Pocket gophers, pp. 239–255. In: Chapman, J.A. and Feldhamer, G.A. (Eds.) Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Economics. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, G.L. 1971. Susceptibility of ponderosa, Jeffrey, and lodgepole pine to pocket gophers. Northwest Science 45: 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, G.L. 1979. Atrazine improves survival and growth of ponderosa pine threatened by vegetative competition and pocket gophers. For. Sci. 25: 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D.E. 1991. Allelopathic potential of western coneflower (Rudbeckia occidentalis). Can. J. Bot. 69: 2806–2808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D.E. and Adams, D.L. 1994. Effects of pocket gophers, bracken fern, and western coneflower on survival and growth of planted conifers. Northwest Science 68: 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D.E. and Johnson, F.D. 1996. Classification of Grand Fir Mosaic habitats. USDA Forest Serv., Intermountain Research Sta., Ogden, Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-337. 16 p.

  • Gliessman, S.R. 1976. Allelopathy in a broad spectrum of environments as illustrated by bracken. Linn. Soc. Bot. J. 73: 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, J.O., Hansen, R.M. and Ward, A.L. 1959. Effect of 2,4–D on abundance and foods of pocket gophers. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 23: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.E. 1982. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Belmont, CA. 911 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R.E. and Steele, R.W. 1992. Chapter 10 - Pocket gophers, pp. 205–230. In: Black, H.C. (tech. Ed.) Silvicultural Approaches to Animal Damage Management in Pacific Northwest Forests. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific Northwest Research Sta., Portland, Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-287.

  • Muller, C.H. 1969. Allelopathy as a factor in ecological process. Vegetatio 18: 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okello, M.M. 1993. Pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) food preferences, habitat relationships, and damage prevention. M. S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow. 64 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, G.E. 1994. Evolutionary genetics, the biological species, and the ecology of the interior cedar-hemlock forests, pp. 91–100. In: Baumgartner, D.M., Lotan, J.E. and Tonn, J.R. (Eds.) Interior Cedar-Hemlock-White Pine Forests: Ecology and Management. Washington State Univ. Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.L. 1984. Allelopathy, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, Florida. 422 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 378 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Co. New York. 481 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.E. 1975. Allelopathic potential of western bracken. J. Chem. Ecol. 1: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teipner, C.L., Garton, E.O. and Nelson, L. Jr. 1983. Pocket gophers in forest ecosystems. USDA Forest Serv., Intermountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Ogden, Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-154. 53 p.

  • Tietjen, H.P., Halvorson, C.H., Legdal, P.L. and Johnson, A.M. 1967. 2,4–D herbicide, vegetation, and pocket gopher relationships, Black Mesa, Colorado. Ecology. 48: 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G.T., Hansen, R.M., Reid, V.H., Tietjen, H.P. and Ward, A.L. 1973. Pocket gophers and Colorado mountain rangeland. Colorado State Univ. Exp. Sta., Ft. Collins. Bulletin 554–S. 90 p.

  • Znerold, R.M. 1979. Western bracken control with asulam. M.S. thesis. Washington State University, Pullman. 36 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, D.E. Effects of pocket gophers, bracken fern, and western coneflower on planted conifers in northern Idaho – an update and two more species. New Forests 18, 199–217 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006504700542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006504700542

Navigation