Skip to main content

Gender-Based Pricing in the Hairdressing Industry

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence and evaluates the claim that the hairdressing industry systematically discriminates on the basis of gender and compares the way in which courts in the UK and US have dealt with such allegations. We argue that "transaction costs" can be used to provide an alternative (perhaps more satisfactory) explanation for the pricing patterns observed than does price discrimination. Any decision to ban gender-based pricing will imply a difficult trade-off between economic efficiency and concerns for gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Ayres, L., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. American Economic Review, 85, 304-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Office (1995). A report on the 1994-95 Family Expenditure Survey. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubashi, J (1994). Myron's makeovers. Financial World, 163(9), 48-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegan, J. (1991). The cutting edge: Anatomy of a start-up. Inc, 13(11), 112-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett. E. M. (1993). How to avoid a scalping at the hair salon or barbershop. Money, 22(8), 16-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., & Seitz, W. (1996). Women pay more-Is it fair? Daily News, August 4.

  • Gypped by gender: A study of price bias against women in the marketplace (1992). City of New York: Department of Consumer Affairs.

  • Handcock, C. (1996a). Facing facts: More results from the Hairdressing Employers' Associations' latest survey. Your Salon, October, pp. 12-14.

  • Handcock, C. (1996b). On the job: More results from the Hairdressing Employers' Associations' latest survey. Your Salon, November, pp. 12-14.

  • Handcock, C. (1996c). Hair on the move: More results from the Hairdressing Employers' Associations' latest survey. Your Salon, December 1996/January 1997, pp. 12-14.

  • H.T.B. (1996). Qualifications in hairdressing: From trainee to manager. Doncaster: Hairdressing Training Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letts, Q. (1996). New York at equality's cutting edge. The Times, 17 July, p. 13.

  • London and the rest (1998). The Economist, 1-7 August, p. 25.

  • Lott, J. R., Jr., & Roberts, R. D. (1991). A guide to pitfalls of identifying price discrimination. Economic Inquiry, 29, 14-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, D. (1984). Franchise facts-No frills hair salons. Venture, 6(4), 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou. A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, R. (1988). Two chains are better than one. Venture, 10(4), 70-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1976). The Robinson-Patman Act: Federal regulation of price differences.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • The price is not right: Gender-based price discrimination in the New York City haircutting, clothing alteration, and dry cleaning industries (1996). A staff report to the Committee on Consumer Affairs, September 27. New York: New York City Council.

  • Rock, S. (1988). Hairdressing's new wave business style. Director, 41(6), 73-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1989). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C. (1991). Self-service activities and formal or informal market services. Applied Economics, 23, 505-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1985). Price discrimination and social welfare. American Economic Review, 75, 870-875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1992). Price discrimination. In: R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), The handbook of industrial organization, pp. 597-654. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. (1992). Microceconomic analysis. 3rd ed. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlesey, F. C. (1996). Levelling the price field. Nations Business, 84(5), 64-65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liston-Heyes, C., Neokleous, E. Gender-Based Pricing in the Hairdressing Industry. Journal of Consumer Policy 23, 107–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006492207450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006492207450

Keywords

  • Economic Policy
  • Transaction Cost
  • Gender Equality
  • Economic Efficiency
  • Price Discrimination