Abstract
Contrary to simplistic views that have long prevailed in genetics textbooks, gene transcription in higher organisms cannot be fully understood by analysing binding of transcription factors to DNA target sites within the promoter regions, just as it would be inappropriate to picture the genetic information within a nucleus as a simple string of DNA. Instead, DNA is embedded in a highly complex chromatin structure that controls the location and accessibility of individual genetic regions in a way we are still far from understanding in detail. What has become obvious, mainly due to ground-breaking research in yeast and animal systems, is that the packaging of certain genes into a chromosomal matrix is regulated via sophisticated chromatin remodelling mechanisms that define whether and when a gene becomes accessible to the transcription machinery. In plants, especially the analysis of transgenes and transposable elements has reminded us of the presence of epigenetic control mechanisms, which can affect the reliable expression of transgenes. There is increasing evidence that chromatin components play an important part in plant epigenetics. The purpose of this review is to describe the main general principles of chromatin remodelling as they have been elucidated in non-plant systems and to discuss their relevance for the control of gene expression in plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alland, L., Muhle, R., Hou, H., Jr., Potes, J., Chin, L., Schreiber-Agus, N. and DePinho, R. A. 1997. Role for N-CoR and histone deacetylase in Sin3–mediated transcriptional repression. Nature 387: 49–55.
Ammerpohl, O., Schmitz, A., Steinmuller, L. and Renkawitz, R. 1998. Repression of the mouse M-lysozyme gene involves both hindrance of enhancer factor binding to the methylated enhancer and histone deacetylation. Nucl. Acids Res. 26: 5256–5260.
Ayer, D.E., Kretzner, L. and Eisenman, R.N. 1993. Mad: a heterodimeric partner for Max that antagonizes Myc transcriptional activity. Cell 72: 211–222.
Ayer, D.E., Lawrence, Q.A. and Eisenman, R.N. 1994. Mad-Max transcription repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3. Cell 80: 777–786.
Belyaev, N.D., Houben, A., Baranczewski, P. and Schubert, I. 1998. The acetylation patterns of histones H3 and H4 along Vicia faba chromosomes are different. Chromosome Res. 6: 59–63.
Bianchi, M.W. and Viotti, A. 1988. DNA methylation and tissuespecific transcription of the storage protein genes of maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 11: 203–214.
Brownell, J.E., Zhou, J., Ranalli, T., Kobayashi, R., Edmondson, D.G., Roth, S.Y. and Allis, C.D. 1996. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5 linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84: 843–851.
Buchman, A.R., Kimmerly, W.J., Rine, J. and Kornberg, R.D. 1988. Two DNA-binding factors recognize specific sequences at silencers, upstream activating sequences, autonomously replicating sequences, and telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 210–225.
Burley, S.K. and Roeder, R.G. 1996. Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 769–799.
Cairns, B.R. 1998. Chromatin remodelling machines: similar motors, ulterior motives. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 20–25.
Chen, H., Lin, R.J., Schiltz, R.L., Chakravarti, D., Nash, A., Nagy, L., Privaisky, M.L., Nakatani, Y. and Evans, R.M. 1997. Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 90: 569–580.
Chen, Z.J. and Pikaard, C.S. 1997. Epigenetic silencing of RNA polymerase I transcription: a role for DNA methylation and histone modification in nucleolar dominance. Genes Dev. 11: 2124–2136.
Csink, A.K. and Henikoff, S. 1996. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature 381: 529–531.
Csink, A.K. and Henikoff, S. 1998. Something from nothing: the evolution and utility of satellite repeats. Trends Genet. 14: 200–204.
DeVit, M.J., Waddle, J.A. and Johnston, M. 1997. Regulated nuclear translocation of the Mig1 glucose repressor. Mol. Biol. Cell 8: 1603–1618.
Diffley, J.F. and Stillmann, B. 1989. Transcriptional silencing and lamins. Nature 342: 24.
Dreesen, T.D., Henikoff, S. and Loughney, K. 1991. A pairingsensitive element that mediates trans-inactivation is associated with the Drosophila brown gene. Genes Dev. 5: 331–340.
Eden, S., Hashimshony, T., Keshet, I., Cedar, H. and Thorne, A.W. 1998. DNA methylation models histone acetylation [letter]. Nature 394: 842.
Edmondson, D.G., Smith, M.M. and Roth, S.Y. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10: 1247–1259.
Fatamura, M., Monden, Y., Okabe, T., Fujita-Yoshigaki, J., Yokoyama, S. and Nishimura, S. 1995. Trichostatin A inhibits both ras-induced neurite outgrowth of PC12 cells and morphological transformation of N1H3T3 cells. Oncogene 10: 1119–1123.
Gatti, M. and Pimpinelli, S. 1992. Functional elements in Drosophila melanogaster heterochromation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 26: 239–275.
Goodrich, J., Puangsomlee, P., Martin, M., Long, D., Meyerowitz, E.M. and Coupland, G. 1997. A polycomb-group gene regulates homeotic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Nature 386: 44–51.
Grossniklaus, U., VielleCalzada, J.P., Hoeppner, M.A. and Gagliano, W.B. 1998. Maternal control of embryogenesis by medea, a Polycomb group gene in Arabidopsis. Science 280: 446–450.
Hecht, A., Laroche, T., Strahl-Bolsinger, S., Gasser, S.M. and Grunstein, M. 1995. Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell 80: 583–592.
Heinzel, T., Lavinsky, R.M., Mullen, T.M., Soderstrom, M., Laherty, C.D., Torchia, J., Yang, W.M., Brard, G., Ngo, S.D., Davie, J.R., Seto, E., Eisenman, R.N., Rose, D.W., Glass, C.K. and Rosenfeld, M.G. 1997. A complex containing NCoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression [see comments]. Nature 387: 43–48.
Henikoff, S. and Comai, L. 1998. A DNA methyltransferase homolog with a chromodomain exists in multiple polymorphic forms in arabidopsis [in process citation]. Genetics 149: 307–318.
Herschbach, B.M., Arnaud, M.B. and Johnson, A.D. 1994. Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast alpha 2 protein in vitro. Nature 370: 309–311.
Hoffmann, A., Chiang, C.-M., Oelschlager, T., Xie, X., Burley, S.K., Nakatani, Y. and Roeder, R.G. 1996. A histone octamer-like structure within TFIID. Nature 380: 356–359.
Houben, A., Belyaev, N.D., Turner, B.M. and Schubert, I. 1996. Differential immunostaining of plant chromosomes by antibodies recognizing acetylated histone H4 variants. Chromosome Res. 4: 191–194.
Howe, M., Dimitri, P., Berloco, M. and Wakimoto, B.T. 1995. Ciseffects of heterochromatin on heterochromatic and euchromatic gene activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 140: 1033–1045.
Imbalzano, A.N., Kwon, H., Green, M.R. and Kingston, R.E. 1994. Facilitated binding of a TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370: 481–485.
Ingram, R., Charrier, B., Scollan, C. and Meyer, P. 1999. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing the Drosophila Polycomb (Pc) chromodomain show developmental alterations: possible role of Pc chromodomain proteins in chromatin-mediated gene regulation in plants. Plant Cell 11: 1047–1060.
Ito, T., Bulger, M., Pazin, M.J., Kobayashi, R. and Kadonaga, J.T. 1997. ACF, an ISWI-containing and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor. Cell 90: 145–155.
Izban, M.G. and Luse, D.S. 1992. Factor-stimulated RNA polymerase II transcribes at physiological elongation rates on naked DNA but very poorly on chromatin templates. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 13647–13655.
Jeddeloh, J.A., Bender, J. and Richards, E.J. 1998. The DNA methylation locus DDM1 is required for maintenance of gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Gene Dev. 12: 1714–1725.
Jeddeloh, J.A., Stokes, T.L. and Richards, E.J. 1999. Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2–like protein. Nature Genet. 22: 94–96.
Kass, S.U., Pruss, D. and Wolffe, A.P. 1997. How does DNA methylation repress transcription? Trends Genet. 13: 444–449.
Kaufman, P.D., Kobayashi, R., Kessler, N. and Stillman, B. 1995. The p150 and p60 subunits of chromatin assembly factor 1: a molecular link between newly synthesised histones and DNA replication. Cell 81: 1105–1114.
Keleher, C.A., Redd, M.J., Schultz, M., Carlson, M. and Johnson, A. D. 1992. SSN6–TUP1 is a general repressor of trancription in yeast. Cell 68: 709–719.
Kellum, R. and Alberts, B.M. 1995. Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos. J. Cell Sci. 108: 1419–1431.
Kellum, R., Raff, J.W. and Alberts, B.M. 1995. Heterochromatin protein 1 distribution during development and during the cell cycle in Drosophila embryos. J. Cell Sci. 108: 1407–1418.
Keshet, I., Lieman-Hurwitz, J. and Cedar, H. 1986. DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin. Cell 44: 535–543.
Kingston, R.E., Bunker, C.A. and Imbalzano, A.N. 1996. Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 10: 905–920.
Kolle, D., Brosch, G., Lechner, T., Pipal, A., Helliger, W., Taplick, J. and Loidl, P. 1999. Different types of maize histone deacetylases are distinguished by a highly complex substrate and site specificity. Biochemistry 38: 6769–6773.
Kouzarides, T. 1999. Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 40–48.
Laherty, C.D., Yang, W.-M., Sun, J.-M., Davie, J.R., Seto, E. and Eisenmann, R.N. 1997. Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate Mad transcriptional repression. Cell 89: 349–356.
Lewis, E.B. 1978. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276: 565–570.
Lewis, J.D., Meehan, R.R., Henzel, W.J., Maurer-Fogy, I., Jeppesen, P., Klein, F. and Bird, A. 1992. Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell 69: 905–914.
Li, G.F., Bishop, K.J., Chandrasekharan, M.B. and Hall, T.C. 1999. Beta-phaseolin gene activation is a two-step process: PvALF-facilitated chromatin modification followed by abscisic acid-mediated gene activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 7104–7109.
Li, G.F., Chandler, S.P., Wolffe, A.P. and Hall, T.C. 1998. Architectural specificity in chromatin structure at the TATA box in vivo: nucleosome displacement upon β-phaseolin gene activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 4772–4777.
Locke, J., Kotarski, A. and Tartof, K.D. 1988. Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and mass action model that explains their effect. Genetics 120: 181–198.
Loidl, P. 1998. Histone acetylation: new facts - old questions. In: T.C. Hall, A.P. Wolffe, R.J. Ferl and M.A. Vega-Palas (Eds.) Chromatin and DNA Modification: Plant Gene Expression and Silencing, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid, pp. 14–15.
Luger, K., Maeder, A.W., Richmond, R.K., Sargent, D.F. and Richmond, T.J. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8Å resolution. Nature 389: 251–260.
Lusser, A., Brosch, G., Loidl, A., Haas, H. and Loid, P. 1997. Identification of maize histone deacetylase HD2 as an acidic nucleolar phosphoprotein. Science 277: 88–91.
Lusser, A., Brosch, G., Lopez Rodas, G. and Loidl, P. 1997. Histone acetyltransferases during the cell cycle and differentiation of Physarum polycephalum. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 74: 102–110.
Matallana, E., Franco, L. and Perez-Ortin, J.E. 1992. Chromatin structure of the yeast SUC2 promoter in regulatory mutants.Mol. Gen. Genet. 231: 395–400.
Meisterernst, M., Horikoshi, M. and Roeder, R.G. 1990. Recombinant yeast TFIID, a general transcription factor, mediates activation by the gene-specific factor USF in a chromatin assembly assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9153–9157.
Michailidis, J., Murray, N.D. and Graves, J.A.M. 1988. A correlation between development time and variegated position effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 52: 119–123.
Moore, G.D., Sinclair, D.A. and Grigliatti, T.A. 1983. Histone gene multiplicity and position effect variegation in D. melanogaster. Genetics 105: 327–344.
Moran, E. 1993. DNA tumour virus transforming proteins and the cell cycle. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3: 63–70.
Mottus, R., Reeves, R. and Grigliatti, T.A. 1980. Butyrate suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 178: 465–469.
Nan, X.S., Campoy, F.J. and Bird, A. 1997. MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin. Cell 88: 471–481.
Nan, X.S., Ng, H.H., Johnson, C.A., Laherty, C.D., Turner, B.M., Eisenman, R.N. and Bird, A. 1998. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393: 386–389.
Ng, H.H. and Bird, A. 1999. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 158–163.
Oelschlager, T., Chiang, C.-M. and Roeder, R.G. 1996. Topology and reorganisation of a human TFIID-promoter complex. Nature 382: 735–738.
Ogryzko, W., Schiltz, R.L., Rusanova, V., Howard, B.H. and Nakatani, Y. 1996. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 87: 953–959.
Ohad, N., Yadegari, R., Margossian, L., Hannon, M., Michaeli, D., Harada, J.J., Goldberg, R.B. and Fischer, R.L. 1999. Mutations in FIE, a WD polycomb group gene, allow endosperm development without fertilization. Plant Cell 11: 407–415.
Paro, R. 1993. Mechanisms of heritable gene repression during development of Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5: 999–1005.
Paro, R. and Hogness, D. 1991. The polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 263–267.
Pazin, M.J. and Kadonaga, J.T. 1997. What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription? Cell 89: 325–328.
Peterson, C.L. and Tamkun, J.W. 1995. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 143–146.
Pikaart, M.I., RecillasTarga, F. and Felsenfeld, G. 1998. Loss of transcriptional activity of a transgene is accompanied by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation and is prevented by insulators. Genes Dev. 12: 2852–2862.
Platero, J.S., Csink, A.K., Quintanilla, A. and Henikoff, S. 1998. Changes in chromosomal localization of heterochromatinbinding proteins during the cell cycle in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 140: 1297–1306.
Pollard, K.J. and Peterson, C.L. 1997. Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 6212–6222.
Reuter, G. and Spierer, P. 1992. Position-effect variegation and chromatin proteins. BioEssays 14: 605–612.
Roth, S.Y. 1995. Chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression in yeast. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 5: 168–173.
Satchwell, S., Drew, H. and Travers, A. 1986. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosomal DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 191: 659–679.
Schmid, A., Fascher, K.-D. and Horz, W. 1992. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication. Cell 71: 853–864.
Selker, E.U. 1998. Trichostatin A causes selective loss of DNA methylation in Neurospora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9430–9435.
Spofford, J.B. 1976. Position-effect variegation in Drosophila. In: Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Academic Press, London, pp. 955–1019.
Studitsky, V.M., Clark, D.J. and Felsenfeld, G. 1994. A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template. Cell 76: 371–382.
Svaren, J. and Horz, W. 1997. Transcription factors vs nucleosomes: Regulation of the PH05 promoter in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22: 93–97.
Tauton, J., Hassig, C.A. and Schreiber, S.L. 1996. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 272: 408–411.
Tazi, J. and A., B. 1990. Alternative chromatin structure at CpG islands. Cell 60: 909–920.
Thompson, J.S., Hecht, A. and Grunstein, M. 1993. Histones and the regulation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58: 247–256.
Torchia, J., Rose, D.W., Inostroza, J., Kamei, Y., Westin, S., Glass, C.K. and Rosenfeld, M.G. 1997. The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediated nuclear-receptor function. Nature 387: 677–684.
Travers, A. 1999. An engine for nucleosome remodeling. Cell 96: 311–314.
Tsukiyama, T. and Wu, C. 1995. Purification and properties of an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling factor. Cell 83: 1011–1020.
Tsukiyama, T., Becker, P.B., and Wu, C. 1994. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor [see comments]. Nature 367: 525–532.
Turner, B.M., Birley, A.J. and Lavender, J. 1992. Hist one-H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell 69: 375–384.
Tzamarias, D. and Struhl, K. 1994. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8–Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature 369: 758–761.
Varga-Weisz, P. D., Wilm, M., Bonte, E., Dumas, K., Mann, M. and Becker, P. B. 1997. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II [erratum published in Nature 389: 1003]. Nature 388: 598–602.
Wade, P.A., Jones, P.L., Vermaak, D., Veenstra, G.J.C., Imhof, A., Sera, T., Tse, C., Ge, H., Shi, Y.B., Hansen, J.C. and Wolffe, A.P. 1998. Histone deacetylase directs the dominant silencing of transcription in chromatin: association with MeCP2 and the Mi-2 chromodomain SWI SNF ATPase. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 63: 435–445.
Waltzer, L. and Bienz, M. 1995. Drosophila CBP represses the transcription factor TCF to antagonise Wingless signalling. Nature 395: 521–525.
Wang, W.D., Xue, Y.T., Zhou, S., Kuo, A., Cairns, B.R. and Crabtree, G.R. 1996. Diversity and specialization of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Genes Dev. 10: 2117–2130.
Weiler, K.S. and Wakimoto, B.T. 1995. Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 577–605.
Winston, F. and Carlson, M. 1992. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 8: 387–391.
Wolffe, A.P. and Pruss, D. 1996. Chromatin: hanging on to histones. Curr. Biol. 6: 234–237.
Wong, J., Shi, Y.-B. and Wolffe, A.P. 1995. A role for nucleosome assembly in both silencing and activation of the Xenopus TrßA gene by the thyroid hormone receptor. Genes Dev. 9: 2696–2711.
Workman, J.K. and Roeder, R.G. 1987. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 51: 613–622.
Yao, T., Oh, S.P., Fuchs, M., Zhou, N., Ch'ng, L., Newsome, D., Bronson, R.T., Li, E., Livingston, D.M. and Eckner, R. 1998. Gene dosage-dependent embryonic development and proliferation defects in mice lacking the transcription integrator p300. Cell 93: 361–372.
Ye, Q. and Worman, H.J. 1996. Interaction between an integral protein of the nuclear-envelope inner membrane and human chromoadomain proteins homologous to Drosophila HP1. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 14653–14656.
Yoshida, M. and Beppu, T. 1988. Reversible arrest of proliferation of rat 3Y1 fibroblasts in both G1 and G2 phases by trichostatin A. Exp. Cell Res. 177: 122–131.
Yoshinaga, S.K., Peterson, C.L., Herskowitz, I. and Yamamoto, K.R. 1992. Roles of SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 proteins for transcriptional enhancement by steroid receptors. Science 258: 1598–1604.
Zhang, W. and Nelson, D.A. 1988. Histone acetylation in chicken erythrocytes. Rates of acetylation and evidence that histones in both active and potentially active chromatin are rapidly modified. Biochem. J. 250: 233–239.
Zhang, Y., LeRoy, G., Seelig, H.P., Lane, W.S. and Reinberg, D. 1998. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 95: 279–289.
Zitomer, R.S. and Lowry, C.V. 1992. Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 56: 1–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, P. Transcriptional transgene silencing and chromatin components. Plant Mol Biol 43, 221–234 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006483428789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006483428789