Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf senescence-like characteristics contribute to cotton's premature photosynthetic decline

  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leaf and canopy photosynthesis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) declines as the crop approaches cutout, just as the assimilate needs for reproductive growth are peaking. Our objective with this study was to determine whether this decline is due to remobilization of leaf components to support the reproductive growth or due to some cue from the changing environmental conditions during the growing season. Field studies were conducted in 1995–1996 at Stoneville, Mississippi, using six cotton genotypes and two planting dates (early and late), which produced two distinctly different cotton populations reaching cutout at different times. Among the six genotypes were a photoperiod sensitive line (non-flowering) and its counter part which had photoperiod insensitive genes backcrossed four times to the photoperiod sensitive line (flowering). This pair was used to assess the degree that the photosynthetic decline could be attributed to reproductive sink development. Leaf CO2-exchange rate (CER) and chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence measurements were taken in mid-August, a period corresponding to cutout for the early planted plots, and those leaves were collected. Leaf Chl level, soluble protein level, various soluble carbohydrate levels and Rubisco activities were assayed on those leaves. Averaged across years, leaf CER and soluble protein levels were reduced approximately 14% and 18%, respectively, for the early planted compared to the late planted cotton. Neither leaf Chl levels or Chl fluorescence Fv/Fm values for Photosystem II yield were altered by the planting date. In 1996, leaves from the non-flowering line had 12% greater Chl and 20% greater soluble protein levels than the flowering line. However, in 1996, the CER of the early planted non-flowering line was reduced 10% compared to the late planted. Although remobilization of leaf N to reproductive growth appears to be the principle component causing the cutout photosynthetic decline, the data also indicate that environmental factors can play a small role in causing the decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bondada BR, Oosterhuis DM, Norman RJ and Baker WH (1996) Canopy photosynthesis, growth, yield and boll 15N accumulation under nitrogen stress in cotton. Crop Sci 36: 127-133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes G (1991) Growth at elevated CO2: Photosynthetic responses mediated through rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14: 795-806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes G, Ogren WL and Hageman RH (1972) Light saturation, photosynthesis rate, RuDP carboxylase activity and specific leaf weight in soybeans grown under different light intensities

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Constable GA and Rawson HM (1980) Carbon production and utilization in cotton: Inferences from a carbon budget. Aust J Plant Physiol 7: 539-553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix DL (1993) Rapid extraction and analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant tissues. Crop Sci 33: 1306-1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holden M (1976) Chlorophylls. In: Goodwin TW (ed) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments, pp 1-37. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT (1994) Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton lint yield and yield components. Agron J 86: 731-735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT (1999) Potassium deficiency increases specific leaf weights and leaf glucose levels in field-grown cotton. Agron J 91: 962-968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT and Meredith WR Jr (1994) Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci 34: 700-705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT and Meredith WR Jr (1997) Dry matter production, nutrient uptake, and growth of cotton as affected by potassium fertilization. J Plant Nutr 20: 531-548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT and Turley RB (1998) Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes. Photosynth Res 56: 15-25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT and Vaughn KC (1998) Physiological, structural and immunological characterization of leaf and chloroplast development in cotton. Protoplasma 202: 23-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT, Heitholt JJ and Vaughn KC (1993) Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Sci 33: 1295-1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Echarte L and Andrade FH (2000) Profiles in leaf senescence during reproductive growth sunflower and maize. Ann Bot 85: 187-195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR and de Wit CT (1975) Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189: 565-567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosten JJ, Wilkins D and Besford RT (1994) Regulation of the expression of photosynthetic nuclear genes by CO2 is mimicked by regulation by carbohydrates: A mechanism for the acclimation of photosynthesis to high CO2. Plant Cell Environ 17: 913-923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner DA and Burke JJ (1993) Cool night temperatures alter leaf starch and Photosystem II chlorophyll fluorescence in cotton. Agron J 85: 836-840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R (1988) Response of leaf ontogeny and photosynthetic activity to reproductive growth in cotton. Plant Physiol 87: 274-279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Meredith WR Jr and Williford JR (1986) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in near-isogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82: 635-640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.T. Pettigrew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettigrew, W., McCarty, J. & Vaughn, K. Leaf senescence-like characteristics contribute to cotton's premature photosynthetic decline. Photosynthesis Research 65, 187–195 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006455524955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006455524955

Navigation