Abstract
Leaf and canopy photosynthesis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) declines as the crop approaches cutout, just as the assimilate needs for reproductive growth are peaking. Our objective with this study was to determine whether this decline is due to remobilization of leaf components to support the reproductive growth or due to some cue from the changing environmental conditions during the growing season. Field studies were conducted in 1995–1996 at Stoneville, Mississippi, using six cotton genotypes and two planting dates (early and late), which produced two distinctly different cotton populations reaching cutout at different times. Among the six genotypes were a photoperiod sensitive line (non-flowering) and its counter part which had photoperiod insensitive genes backcrossed four times to the photoperiod sensitive line (flowering). This pair was used to assess the degree that the photosynthetic decline could be attributed to reproductive sink development. Leaf CO2-exchange rate (CER) and chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence measurements were taken in mid-August, a period corresponding to cutout for the early planted plots, and those leaves were collected. Leaf Chl level, soluble protein level, various soluble carbohydrate levels and Rubisco activities were assayed on those leaves. Averaged across years, leaf CER and soluble protein levels were reduced approximately 14% and 18%, respectively, for the early planted compared to the late planted cotton. Neither leaf Chl levels or Chl fluorescence Fv/Fm values for Photosystem II yield were altered by the planting date. In 1996, leaves from the non-flowering line had 12% greater Chl and 20% greater soluble protein levels than the flowering line. However, in 1996, the CER of the early planted non-flowering line was reduced 10% compared to the late planted. Although remobilization of leaf N to reproductive growth appears to be the principle component causing the cutout photosynthetic decline, the data also indicate that environmental factors can play a small role in causing the decline.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bondada BR, Oosterhuis DM, Norman RJ and Baker WH (1996) Canopy photosynthesis, growth, yield and boll 15N accumulation under nitrogen stress in cotton. Crop Sci 36: 127-133
Bowes G (1991) Growth at elevated CO2: Photosynthetic responses mediated through rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14: 795-806
Bowes G, Ogren WL and Hageman RH (1972) Light saturation, photosynthesis rate, RuDP carboxylase activity and specific leaf weight in soybeans grown under different light intensities
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-251
Constable GA and Rawson HM (1980) Carbon production and utilization in cotton: Inferences from a carbon budget. Aust J Plant Physiol 7: 539-553
Hendrix DL (1993) Rapid extraction and analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant tissues. Crop Sci 33: 1306-1311
Holden M (1976) Chlorophylls. In: Goodwin TW (ed) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments, pp 1-37. Academic Press, New York
Pettigrew WT (1994) Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton lint yield and yield components. Agron J 86: 731-735
Pettigrew WT (1999) Potassium deficiency increases specific leaf weights and leaf glucose levels in field-grown cotton. Agron J 91: 962-968
Pettigrew WT and Meredith WR Jr (1994) Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci 34: 700-705
Pettigrew WT and Meredith WR Jr (1997) Dry matter production, nutrient uptake, and growth of cotton as affected by potassium fertilization. J Plant Nutr 20: 531-548
Pettigrew WT and Turley RB (1998) Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes. Photosynth Res 56: 15-25
Pettigrew WT and Vaughn KC (1998) Physiological, structural and immunological characterization of leaf and chloroplast development in cotton. Protoplasma 202: 23-37
Pettigrew WT, Heitholt JJ and Vaughn KC (1993) Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Sci 33: 1295-1299
Sadras VO, Echarte L and Andrade FH (2000) Profiles in leaf senescence during reproductive growth sunflower and maize. Ann Bot 85: 187-195
Sinclair TR and de Wit CT (1975) Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189: 565-567
Van Oosten JJ, Wilkins D and Besford RT (1994) Regulation of the expression of photosynthetic nuclear genes by CO2 is mimicked by regulation by carbohydrates: A mechanism for the acclimation of photosynthesis to high CO2. Plant Cell Environ 17: 913-923
Warner DA and Burke JJ (1993) Cool night temperatures alter leaf starch and Photosystem II chlorophyll fluorescence in cotton. Agron J 85: 836-840
Wells R (1988) Response of leaf ontogeny and photosynthetic activity to reproductive growth in cotton. Plant Physiol 87: 274-279
Wells R, Meredith WR Jr and Williford JR (1986) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in near-isogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82: 635-640
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pettigrew, W., McCarty, J. & Vaughn, K. Leaf senescence-like characteristics contribute to cotton's premature photosynthetic decline. Photosynthesis Research 65, 187–195 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006455524955
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006455524955