Skip to main content
Log in

A Philosophical Framework for Case Studies

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People who teach business ethics seem locked between two general approaches: an applied philosophy approach that emphasizes the application of abstract ethical theories and principles to specific cases, and the case method approach that leaves the students without any more general theoretical framework with which to approach ethical issues. Classical American Pragmatism, understood as a school of philosophical thought, links these two approaches by providing a new grounding for moral theory in which moral rules are understood as working hypotheses abstracted from concrete situations and moralreasoning demands the return to concrete situations as the foundation for moral decision making that is inherently contextual. Thus moral decision making is bottom up rather than top down, and a sense of moral rightness comes not from the indoctrination of abstract principles but from attunement to the way in which moral beliefs and practices must be rooted naturally in the very conditions of human existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennis, W.: 1990, Why Leaders Can't Lead (Jossey Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.: 1990, 'The Case Against Moral Pluralism', Environmental Ethics 12, 112-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R. and R. Green: 1989, 'Ethical Theory in Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1983, 'Human Nature and Conduct', in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), The Middle Works, vol. 14 (University of Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1984, 'Affective Throught', in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, vol. 2 (University of Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1986, 'Logic: The Theory of Inquiry', in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, vol. 12 (University of Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and P. Werhane.: 1993, Ethical issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 4th ed. (Prentice Hill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J.: 1961, Excellence: Can we be Equal and Excellent Too? (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L.: 1986, 'Moral Leadership in Business: The Role of Structure', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5, 75-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.: 1999, 'And Now for Something Completely Different: From Heidegger to Entrepreneurship', Business Ethics Quarterly 9, 169-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.: 1992, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchholz, R.A., Rosenthal, S.B. A Philosophical Framework for Case Studies. Journal of Business Ethics 29, 25–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006438824678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006438824678

Keywords

Navigation