Skip to main content

Aortic root asymmetry in Marfan patients; evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with standard echocardiography

The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging volume 16, pages 161–168 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

Background: Patients with Marfan syndrome may develop aortic root dissection despite only mild aortic root dilation as shown by standard echocardiography, which may be due to aortic root asymmetry. Purpose of the present study was to investigate aortic root asymmetry by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with Marfan syndrome and to compare these measurements with standardly performed echocardiography. Methods: Eighty-seven Marfan patients (mean age 31 ± 8 years) underwent MR imaging. From this population, 15 patients (mean age 29 ± 3 years) were selected in whom both echocardiography and MR imaging had been performed within 3 months. With echocardiography, the aortic root was measured according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography. With MR imaging, a short axis view of the aortic root was obtained to measure distances between the noncoronary, right coronary and left coronary cusps and the aortic root area. Correlations between aortic root area and diameters were assessed, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) calculated. Results: No difference in the standardly measured noncoronary to right coronary cusp diameter between MR imaging and echocardiography was shown (42 ± 6 mm). Largest aortic root diameter on the MR images was the right to left coronary cusp diameter (46 ± 7 mm, p < 0.02). For a given noncoronary to right coronary cusp diameter, 95% confidence intervals revealed a variation of −20 to +20% in the aortic root area. Conclusions: The majority of Marfan patients show asymmetric dilation of the aortic root by MR imaging. This phenomenon may go unnoticed when standard echocardiography is performed. The asymmetry of the aortic root might be of clinical importance in unexpected aortic root dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Dietz HC, Cutting GR, Pyeritz RE, et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature 1991; 352: 227–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pyeritz RE. Disorders of fibrillins and microfibrilogenesis: Marfan syndrome, MASS phenotype, contractural arachnodactyly and related conditions. In: Emery AE, Rimoin DL, David L, Connor JM, Pyeritz RE, editors. Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics, 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murdoch Jl, Walker BA, Halpern BL, Kuzma JW, McKusick VA. Life expectancy and causes of death in the Marfan syndrome. N Engl J Med 1972; 286: 804–808.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marsalese DL, Moodie DS, Vacante M, et al. Marfan's syndrome: natural history and long-term follow up of cardiovascular involvement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 422–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman DI, Burton KJ, Gray J, et al. Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 157–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gott VL, Pyeritz RE, Cameron DE, et al. Composite graft repair of Marfan aneurysms of the ascending aorta: results in 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52: 38–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Groenink M, Lohuis TAJ, Tijssen JGP, et al. Survival and complication in Marfan's syndrome: implications of current guidelines. Heart 1999; 82: 499–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Legget ME, Unger TA, O'Sullivan CK, et al. Aortic root complications in Marfan's syndrome: identification of a lower risk group. Heart 1996; 75: 389–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gott VL, Greene PS, Alejo DE, et al. Replacement of the aortic root in patients with Marfan's syndrome. N Eng J Med 1999; 340: 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. The Committee on M-mode standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072–1083.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, et al. Prognostic significance of the pattern of aortic root dilatation in the Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1470–1476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Come PC, Fortuin NJ, White RI, McKusick VA. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiovascular abnormalities in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med 1983; 74: 465–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson IA, de Belder MA, Treasure T, Camm AJ, Pumphrey CW. Cardiovascular manifestations of Marfan's syndrome: improved evaluation by transoesophageal echocardiography. Br Heart J 1993; 69: 104–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietro DA, Voelkel AG, Ray BJ, et al. Reproducibility of echocardiography. A study evaluating the variability of serial echocardiographic measurements. Chest 1981; 79: 29–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roozendaal L, Groenink M, Nae. MSJ, et al. Marfan syndrome in children and adolescents: an adjusted nomogram for screening aortic root dilatation. Heart 1998; 78: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soulen RL, Fishman EK, Pyeritz RE, Zerhouni EA, Pessar ML. Marfan syndrome: evaluation with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 1987; 165: 697–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 (1): 307–310.

  18. Friedman BJ, Waters J, Kwan OL, DeMaria AN. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in determination of cardiac dimensions in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 1369–1376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hokken RB, Bruin de HG, Taams MA, et al. A comparison of adult pulmonary autograft diameter measurements with echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 301–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kon ND, Link KM, Buchanan WP, Nomeir AM, Downes TR, Cordell AR. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of recipient for cryopreserved aortic allograft. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54: 39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aldrich HR, Labarre RL, Roman MJ, Rosen SE, Spitzer MC, Devereux RB. Color flow and conventional echocardiography of the Marfan syndrome. Echocardiography 1992; 9: 627–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grande KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, Kunzelman KS. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry. Ann Biomed Eng 1998; 26: 534–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Lilian J. Meijboom, Maarten Groenink, Hans Romkes & Barbara J.M. Mulder

  2. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Maarten Groenink & Ernst E. van der Wall

  3. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jaap Stoker

Authors
  1. Lilian J. Meijboom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maarten Groenink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ernst E. van der Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Romkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jaap Stoker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Barbara J.M. Mulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meijboom, L.J., Groenink, M., van der Wall, E.E. et al. Aortic root asymmetry in Marfan patients; evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with standard echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 16, 161–168 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006429603062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006429603062

  • aortic root
  • echocardiography
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • Marfan syndrome