Skip to main content
Log in

A CCG Account Of Tzotzil Pied Piping

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of extraction and pied-pipingin Tzotzil, a Mayanlanguage, within the framework of Combinatory CategorialGrammar (CCG). In thislanguage, pied-piping is accompanied by the obligatoryreordering of elements withinthe pied-piped XP. This reordering is most evident inconstituent questions whereWH-pied-pipers always occur first in the string and otherelements follow in their normal,canonical order. Within CCG, these facts are accounted forby analyzing pied-pipersas rightward-looking functors from unsaturated NP or PP tofunctors over verbsor other predicates. By virtue of the lexically specifieddirectionality of these functorsand by virtue of a requirement in CCG that all combinatoryrules respect thisdirectionality when sanctioning combinations of functorswith their arguments, thefacts regarding the order of expressions in pied-pipedphrases in Tzotzil fall out. Noappeal to `abstract agreement' or any other sort ofphrase-structural relation isnecessary. The paper demonstrates that the order ofelements observed in pied-pipedconstituents in Tzotzil is an automatic consequenceof the syntactic projection oflexical function/argument relations by meansof the CCG rules of FunctionalApplication and Functional Composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aissen, Judith. 1979. ‘Possessor Ascension in Tzotzil’, in Laura Martin (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, Lucas Brothers Publisher, Columbia, Missouri, pp. 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil Clause Structure, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, Judith. 1996. ‘Pied-Piping, Abstract Agreement, and Functional Projections in Tzotzil’, NLLT 14, 447–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, Judith. 1999. ‘Agent Focus and Inverse in Tzotzil’, Language 75, 451–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon. 1988. ‘Categorial Grammars as Theories of Language’, in Richard T. Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Dierdre Wheeler (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Bob. 1997. Type-Logical Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1982. ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’, in Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1988. ‘Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-constituent Coordination’, in Richard Oehrle et al. (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 153–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, John. 1981. Skop Sotzleb: el Tzotzil de San Lorenzo Zinacantá n, Universidad Nacional Autó noma de Mé xico, Ciudad de Mé xico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, Robert. 1977. Of Cabbages and Kings, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, Giuseppi. 1991. ‘Extraction from NP and the Proper Notion of Head Government’, in A. Giorgi and G. Longobardi, The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, Michael. 1988. Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, Michael. 1996. ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Discontinuous Type Constructors’, in H. Bunt and A. van Horck (eds.), Discontinuous Constituency, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, Glyn. 1994. Type Logical Grammar: Categorial Logic of Signs, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, Glyn. 1995. ‘Discontinuity in Categorial Grammar’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 175–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Thomas C. 1976. "some Hypotheses on Syntactic and Morphological Aspects of Proto-Mayan (*PM)’, in M. McClaran (ed.), Mayan Linguistics I, American Indian Studies Center, UCLA, pp. 44-66.

  • Smith-Stark, Thomas C. 1988. ‘“Pied Piping” con inversion en preguntas parciales’, unpublished paper, El Colegio de Mé xico, Ciudad de Mé xico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark. 1985. ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark. 1987. ‘Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps’, NLLT 5, 403–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark. 1988. ‘Combinators and Grammars’, in Richard Oehrle et al. (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 417–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark. 1990. ‘Gapping as Constituent Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 207–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark. 1996. Surface Structure and Interpretation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1989. ‘Bound Variables in Syntax: Are There Any?’ in Renate Bartsch et al. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1993. ‘Combinatory Grammar and Projection from the Lexicon’, in Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trechsel, Frank R. 1993. ‘QuichéFocus Constructions’, Lingua 91, 33–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trechsel, F.R. A CCG Account Of Tzotzil Pied Piping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18, 611–663 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006409422158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006409422158

Keywords

Navigation