Skip to main content

Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action

Abstract

The Fair-Start Defense justifies affirmative action preferences as a response to harms caused by race- and sex-based discrimination. Rather than base a justification for preferences on the traditional appeal to self-esteem, I argue they are justified in virtue of the effects institutional discrimination has on the goals and aspirations of its victims. In particular, I argue that institutional discrimination puts women and blacks at an unfair competitive disadvantage by causing academic disidentification. Affirmative action is justified as a means of negating this unfair disadvantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Himma, K.E. Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 277–289 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Affirmative Action
  • Action Preference
  • Competitive Disadvantage
  • Institutional Discrimination