Abstract
The Fair-Start Defense justifies affirmative action preferences as a response to harms caused by race- and sex-based discrimination. Rather than base a justification for preferences on the traditional appeal to self-esteem, I argue they are justified in virtue of the effects institutional discrimination has on the goals and aspirations of its victims. In particular, I argue that institutional discrimination puts women and blacks at an unfair competitive disadvantage by causing academic disidentification. Affirmative action is justified as a means of negating this unfair disadvantage.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Himma, K.E. Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 277–289 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357
Keywords
- Economic Growth
- Affirmative Action
- Action Preference
- Competitive Disadvantage
- Institutional Discrimination