Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Ophthalmic Surgeons Aware that Starch Powdered Surgical Gloves are a Risk Factor in Ocular Surgery?

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the level of awareness among UK ophthalmic surgeons of the potential risks from starch powdered surgical gloves during ophthalmic surgery and to show by electron microscopy that starch granule contamination can occur during ophthalmic surgery. Setting: A sample (N = 46) of UK ophthalmologists from the North of England, UK. Methods: Type of glove usage and awareness of the possible risks from starch powdered surgical gloves were assessed by means of a questionnaire sent to ophthalmic surgeons in the North of England. The surface of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) handled with a starch powdered surgical glove was examined by electron microscopy for evidence of starch contamination. Results: Of the sampled ophthalmic surgeons (46), 89.1% considered it important to use starch free surgical gloves and the 84.8% already did so. Starch granule contamination was seen by electron microscopy on the surface of a PMMA IOL which had been handled with starch powdered surgical gloves. Conclusions: Although there has been sporadic attention in the ophthalmic literature to the risks associated with starch powdered surgical gloves in ophthalmology, up to 15% of UK ophthalmic surgeons may still be using starch powdered gloves. The authors show that starch powder contamination of ophthalmic materials can actually occur and remind ophthalmologists that this has been reported in the literature as a possible cause of sterile intra and extraocular inflammation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramsey TL, Douglas FM. Granulomatous inflammation produced by foreign body irritants. J Int Surg 1940; 3(3): 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. German WM. Dusting powder granulomas following surgery. Surg Gynec Obst 1943; 76: 501-507.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McEntee GP, Stuart RC, Bryne PJ, Leen E, Hennessy TP. Experimental study of starch induced intraperitoneal adhesions. Br J Surg 1990; 70(10): 1113-1114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liujendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, Hop WC, Duron JJ, Pailler JL, Camprodon RB, Holmdahl L, van Geldrop HJ, Jeekel J. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 1996; 223(3): 242-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmadhl L, al Jabreen M, Xia G, Risberg. The impact of starch powdered gloves on the formation of adhesions in rats. Eur J Surg 1994; 160(5): 257-261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis H. The hazards of surgical glove dusting powders. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171(6): 521-527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edlich RF. A plea for powder-free surgical gloves. J Emergency Med 1994; 12(1): 69-71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott-Coombes DM, Vipond MN, Thompson JN. General surgeons’ attitudes to the treatment and prevention of abdominal adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993; 75(2): 123-128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Treutner KH, Bertram P, Loser S, Winkeltau G, Schumpelick V. Prevention and therapy of intra-abdominal adhesions. A survey of 200 clinics in Germany. Chirurg 1995; 66(4): 398-403.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCormick OL, Macauley WL, Miller GE. Talc granulomas of the eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 1252-1254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chamlin M. The effect of talc in ocular surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1945; 34: 369-373.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz FE, Linn JG. The effect of glove powders on the eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1951; 34: 585-592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Egger SF, Huber-Spitzy V, Schilda C, Schneider B, Grabner G. Bacterial contamination during extracapsular cataract extraction. Prospective study on 200 consecutive patients. Ophthalmologica 1994; 208(2): 77-81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Assalian A, Thompson P, St. Antoine P, Lemire J, Duperre J, Demers JP, Gauvin P. Anterior chamber fluid contamination after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995; 21(5): 539-542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Samad A, Solomon LD, Miller MA, Mendelson J. Anterior chamber contamination after uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmology 1995; 120(2): 143–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parelman AG. Sterile uveitis and intraocular lens implantation. Am Intraocular Implant Soc J 1979; 5: 301-306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drolsum L, Davanger M, Haaskjold E. Risk factors for an inflammatory response after extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber. IOL Acta Ophthalmologica 1994; 72(1): 21-26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Busin M, Meller D, Cusumano A, Spitznas M. Chronic low grade endophthalmitis. A growing indication for explantation of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmologe 1994; 91(4): 473-478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aronson SB. Starch endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1972; 73(4): 570-578.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bene C, Kranias G. Possible intraocular lens contamination by surgical glove powder. Ophthalmic Surg 1986; 17(5): 290-291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vafidis GC, Marsh RJ, Stacy AR. Bacterial contamination of intraocular lens surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 520-523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karcioglu ZA, Aran AJ, Holmes DL, Kapicioglu Z, Lopez J. Inflammation due to surgical glove powders in the rabbit eye. Arch.Ophthalmol 1988;.106:. 808-881.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Driebe WT, Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, Schwartz LK, Culbertson WW. Pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Diagnosis and treatment. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 442-448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith RE. Inflammation after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 102(6): 788-790.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Oh Y, Katz J, Spaeth GL, Wilson RP. Risk factors for the development of encapsulated filtering blebs. The role of surgical glove powder and 5-fluorouracil. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 629-634.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. English FP, DiMarco A. Talc powder granules. Ocular Surg News 1996; Mar(3): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aran AJ, Lopez JG, Karcioglu. Talcum particles on surgical gloves: quantitative analysis of cleaning methods. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 170.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Villasenor RA, Harris DF, Barron GJ, Krasnow M, Salz JJ. Powderfree surgical gloves. Ophthalmic Surg 1984; 15(3): 241-243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, West Cumberland Hospital, Whitehaven, CA28 8JG, UK

    P. William Sellar

  2. Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    R. Andrew Sparrow

Authors
  1. P. William Sellar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Andrew Sparrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sellar, P.W., Sparrow, R.A. Are Ophthalmic Surgeons Aware that Starch Powdered Surgical Gloves are a Risk Factor in Ocular Surgery?. Int Ophthalmol 22, 247–251 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006392915801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006392915801

Keywords

Search

Navigation