Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Studies on the Usefulness of Seven Ecological Indices for the Marine Coastal Monitoring Close to the Shore on the Swedish East Coast

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simultaneous behaviour of seven ecological indices(Hurlbert’s, Margalef’s, Menhinick’s, Shannon’s,species number, Jaccard’s and saprobic index) wasstudied based on phytoplankton data close to the shoreon the East coast of Sweden during the summer 1998.The sampling stations had a similar eutrophicationlevel and were located in bays. Standard phytoplanktondatabases were used in calculating the indices, whichwere later compared using cluster analysis.Hurlbert’s, Margalef’s, Menhinick’s, Shannon’s andspecies number indices, as measure of communitydiversity, produced similar trends which oftendiffered from those based on Jaccard’s index ofsimilarity. However, the simultaneous use of theseindices was found meaningful as a possible part of themonitoring close to the shore. The application of asaprobic index lead to erroneous conclusions in thestudied case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee, R. J. and Johnson, J. E.: 1999, ‘Use of satellite imagery to estimate surface chlorophyll a and Secchi disc depth of Bull Shoals Reservoir, Arkansas, U.S.A.’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 10–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T., Smillie, G., Anderson, J. and Beeson, D.: 1990, ‘A sensitivity analysis of nine diversity and seven similarity indices’, Res. J. WPCF 62, 749–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.: 1970, ‘A biological approach to water quality management’, Wat. Pollut. Contr. 69, 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, F. P.: 1995, ‘A comparison of ship and satellite chlorophyll from California and Peru’, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. B.: 1997, Marine Pollution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haedrick, R.: 1975, ‘Diversity and overlap as measures of environmental quality’, Wat. Res. 9, 945–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.: 1971, ‘The nonconcept of species diversity, a critique and alternative parameters’, Ecology 52, 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatiades, L., Vassiliou, A. and Karydis, M.: 1985, ‘A comparison of phytoplankton biomass parameters and their interrelation with nutrients in Saronicos Gulf (Greece)’, Hydrobiologia 128, 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P.: 1908, ‘Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale’, Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. XLIV, 163, 223–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karydis, M. and Tsirtsis, G.: 1996, ‘Ecological indices, a biometric approach for assessing eutrophication level in the marine environment’, Sci. Total Envir. 186, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R.: 1958, ‘Information theory in ecology’, Gen. Syste. 3, 36–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauch, E.: 1976, ‘Leitformen der Saprobität für die biologische Gewässeranalyse’, Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main.

  • Menhinick, E. P.: 1964, ‘A comparison of some species-individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects’, Ecology 45, 859–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankow, H.: 1990, ‘Ostsee-Algenflora’, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantle, R. and Buck, H.: 1955, ‘Die biologische Ñberwachung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse’, Gas-u. WassFach 96, 604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: 1949, ‘The mathematical theory of communication’, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, M., Pick, F., Mazumder, A., Hamilton, P. and Lean, D.: 1996, ‘Experimental evidence for interactive impacts of human activities on lake algal species richness’, Oikos 76, 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1994, Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen, T. and Willén, T.: 1992, ‘Växtplanktonflora’. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R., Giovanardi, F., Montanari, G. and Rinaldi, A.: 1998, ‘Characterization of the trophic conditions of marine coastal waters with special reference to the NW Adriatic Sea, proposal for a trophic scale, turbidity and generalized water quality index’, Environmetrics 9, 329–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H.: 1984, ‘Diversity, biotic and similarity indices’, Wat. Res. 18, 653–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.: 1948, Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhm, J.: 1967, ‘Comparison of some diversity indices applied to populations of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream receiving organic wastes’, J. Wat. Pollut. Control Feder. 39, 1673–1683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhm, J. and Dorris, T.: 1968, ‘Biological parameters for water quality criteria’, Bioscience 18, 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.: 1964, ‘Patterns in the balance of nature, and related problems in quantitative ecology’. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, B. and Kelly, M.: 1995, ‘Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers’, Aust. J. Ecol. 20, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman A. Danilov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danilov, R.A., Ekelund, N.G.A. Comparative Studies on the Usefulness of Seven Ecological Indices for the Marine Coastal Monitoring Close to the Shore on the Swedish East Coast. Environ Monit Assess 66, 265–279 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006364317956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006364317956

Navigation