Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 47–55 | Cite as

Development and germination of American chestnut somatic embryos

  • Zizhuo Xing
  • William A. Powell
  • Charles A. Maynard

Abstract

American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) plants were regenerated from developing ovules through somatic embryogenesis. On an initiation medium containing 18.18 μM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 1.11 μM 6-benzyladenine (BA), 25 out of 1,576 ovules were induced to form proembryogenic masses (PEMs). These PEMs were cultivated on a development medium for 4 weeks. Individual somatic embryos were then grown on a maturation medium for at least one month, until shoot meristems and radicles were developed. Both development and maturation media consisted of Gamborg's B-5 basal medium, 0.5 μM BA, and 0.5 μM α-naphthaleneacetic acid, but the former contained 20 g l−1 sucrose and the later contained 60 g l−1 sucrose. A range of 86 to 586 embryos per gram PEMs was observed beyond the cotyledonary stage. These embryos then germinated, resulting in plantlets with a 3.3% conversion rate. An additional 6.3% of the mature embryos produced shoots, which could also result in plantlets by rooting of microcuttings. Proembryogenic masses that were established in continuous culture and maintained on initiation medium for 17 months retained regenerability, though the embryo yield decreased over time. Twenty plantlets were acclimatized and grown in potting mix in a greenhouse. The largest 6 were transplanted, along with seedling controls, into a nursery bed in 1997. As of July, 1999, 4 out of the 6 were surviving.

acclimatization Castanea dentata embryogenesis establishment plant regeneration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammirato PV (1983) The regulation of somatic embryo development in plant cell cultures: suspension culture techniques and hormonal requirements. Bio/Technology 1: 68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carraway DT & Merkle SA (1997) Plantlet regeneration from somatic embryos of American chestnut. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1805–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carraway DT, Wilde HD & Merkle SA (1994) Somatic embryogenesis and gene transfer in American chestnut. Journal of the American Chestnut Foundation 8: 29–33Google Scholar
  4. Clarke GM (1994) Statistics & experimental design: an introduction for biologists and biochemists. (pp 111–113). Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffin GJ (1986) Chestnut blight and its control. Horti. Rev. 8: 291–336Google Scholar
  7. Janick J, Kim YH, Kitto S & Saranga Y (1993) Desiccated synthetic seeds. In Redenbaugh K (ed) Synseeds: Applications of Synthetic Seeds to Crop Improvement (pp 409–425). CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Konan NK, Sangwan RS & Sangwan BS (1994) Somatic embryogenesis from cultured mature cotyledons of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 37: 91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lloyd G & McCown B (1980) Commercially feasible micropropagation of Mountain Laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. 30: 421–427Google Scholar
  10. Mathews H, Litz R, Wilde H, Merkle S & Wetzstein H (1992) Stable gene expression of β-glucuronidase and NPT II genes in mango somatic embryos. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 28P: 172–178Google Scholar
  11. Maynard CA, Xing Z, Bickel S & Powell W (1998). Using genetic engineering to help save the American chestnut: A progress report. J of the American Chestnut Foundation 12(2): 40–56.Google Scholar
  12. Merkle SA, Wiecko AT & Watson-Pauley BA (1991) Somatic embryogenesis in American chestnut. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1698–1701Google Scholar
  13. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nitsch JP & Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163: 85–87Google Scholar
  15. Pliego-Alfaro F, Monsalud MJR, Litz RE, Gray DJ & Moon PA (1996) Effect of abscisic acid, osmolarity and partial desiccation on the development of recalcitrant mango somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 44: 63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Powell WA, Catranis CM & Maynard CA (1995) Synthetic antimicrobial peptide design. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction 8: 792–794Google Scholar
  17. SAS Institute (1989) JMPr user's guide: version 2 of JMP (pp 357–379). SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  18. Vieitez FJ (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in chestnut. In Jam SM, Gupta PK & Newton RJ (eds) Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Vol 2(pp 375–407). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Vasil V & Vasil I (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of pear millet (Pennisetum americanum). Ann. Bot. 47: 669–678Google Scholar
  20. Xing Z, Satchwell M, Powell WA & Maynard CA (1997) Micropropagation of American chestnut: increasing rooting rate and preventing shoot-tip necrosis. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 33P: 43–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zizhuo Xing
    • 1
  • William A. Powell
    • 2
  • Charles A. Maynard
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyState University of New York, Health Sciences CenterSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Environmental and Forest BiologyState University of New York, College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of ForestryState University of New York, College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations