Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative measurements in IVUS images

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IntraVascular UltraSound (IVUS) is a catheter-based technique which provides real-time high resolution tomographic images of both the lumen and arterial wall of a coronary segment, this in contrast to X-ray arteriography that provides a shadow image (luminogram) of the entire lumen. Nowadays the lumen and vessel parameters are measured manually, which is very time consuming and suffers from high inter- and intra-obser variability. With the continuing improvement in IVUS imaging, it is now feasible to develop and clinically apply automated methods of three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the coronary vessel morphology in an objective and reproducible way with automated contour detection techniques (QCU). Quantification, in 2D and 3D, as well as volume rendering for visualization of the IVUS images requires segmentation of the images (contour detection). The 3D contour detection system described in this article is based on the combination of contour detection in the transversal and sagital view. This article provides some of the basic principles of IVUS, the IVUS image quantification, the three-dimensional reconstruction and the contour detection and quantification in three-dimensional IVUS images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991; 84: 1087–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Von Birgelen C, Mintz GS, de Feyter PJ, et al. Reconstruction and quantification with three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an update on techniques, challenges, and future directions. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1056–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rasheed Q, Hodgson JM. Applications of intracoronary ultrasonography in the study of coronary artery pathophysiology. J Clin Ultrasound 1993; 21: 569–578.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tobis JM. Intravascular ultrasound: a fantastic voyage. Circulation 1991; 84: 2190–2192.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenfield K, Losordo DW, Ramaswamy K, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary and peripheral arteries from images recorded during two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound examination. Circulation 1991; 84: 1938–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peters RJG, Kok WEM, Rijsterborgh H, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative measurements from intracoronary ultrasound images. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 1593–1599.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foster FS, Knapik DA, Machado JC, Ryan LK, Nissen SE. High-frequency intracoronary ultrasound imaging. Sem Intervent Cardiol 1997; 2: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sonka M, Liang W, Zhang X, DeJong S, Collins SM, McKay CR. Three-dimensional automated segmentation of coronary wall and plaque from intravascular ultrasound pullback sequences. Computers in Cardiology 1995. Los Alamitos, California, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995: 637–640.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Von Birgelen C, Di Mario C, Wenguang L. Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an in-vitro and in-vivo study using a novel system for the contour detection of plaque and lumen. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 516–527.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gil R, von Birgelen C, Prati F, Di Mario C, Ligthart J, Serruys PW. Usefulness of three-dimensional reconstruction for interpretation and quantitative analysis of intracoronary ultrasound during stent deployment. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 761–764.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Von Birgelen C, Gil R, Ruygrok P, et al. Optimized expansion of the Wallstent compared with the Palman-Schatz stent: online observations with two-and three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound after angiographic guidance. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 1067–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sonka M, Zhang X, Siebes M, et al. Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: A knowledge-based approach. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1995; 14: 719–732.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roelandt JRTC, Di Mario C, Pandian NG, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images: rationale, approaches, problems, and directions. Circulation 1994; 90: 1044–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erbele MJ. The latest in electronic imaging. Sem Intervent Cardiol 1997; 2: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prause GPM, DeJong SC, McKay CR, Sonka M. Towards a geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of tortuous coronary arteries based on biplane angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1997; 13: 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dijkstra, J., Koning, G. & Reiber, J. Quantitative measurements in IVUS images. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 15, 513–522 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006334517720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006334517720

Navigation