Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 243–253 | Cite as

Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations

  • Heather Schmidt Albinger
  • Sarah J. Freeman
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the hypothesis that the advantage corporate social performance (CSP) yields in attracting human resources depends on the degree of job choice possessed by the job seeking population. Results indicate that organizational CSP is positively related to employer attractiveness for job seekers with high levels of job choice but not related for populations with low levels suggesting advantages to firms with high levels of CSP in the ability to attract the most qualified employees.

corporate social performance corporate social responsibility employee recruitment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cable, D. M. and T. Judge: 1996, 'Person-organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67, 294–311.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, A. B.: 1991a, 'The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders', Business Horizons 34(4), 39–48.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, A. B.: 1991b, 'CSP Measurement: A Commentary on Methods for Evaluating an Illusive Construct', in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12 ( JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 385–401.Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995. 'A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 20, 92–117.Google Scholar
  5. Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood: 1984, 'Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 27, 42–56.Google Scholar
  6. Council on Economic Priorities: 1997, Screen Company Profiles(New York, NY).Google Scholar
  7. Dolan, K. A.: 1997, 'Kinder, Gentler M.B.A.s', Forbes( June 2), 39–40.Google Scholar
  8. Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, 'What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy', Academy of Management Journal 33, 233–258.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach(Pitman/Ballinger, Boston).Google Scholar
  10. Gatewood, R. D., M. A. Gowan and G. J. Lautenshlager: 1993, 'Corporate Image, Recruitment Image, and Initial Job Choice Decisions', Academy of Management Journal 36, 414–427.Google Scholar
  11. Graves, S. B. and S. A. Waddock: 1994, 'Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Journal 37, 1034–1046.Google Scholar
  12. Judge, T. A. and R. D. Bretz, Jr.: 1992, Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions', Journal of Applied Psychology 77, 261–271.Google Scholar
  13. Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini & Co.: 1997, Company Profiles(Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  14. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, 'Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 31, 854–872.Google Scholar
  15. Quinn, J. B., P. Anderson and S. Finkelstein: 1996, 'Leveraging Intellect', Academy of Management Executive 10(3), 7–27.Google Scholar
  16. Riordan, C. M., R. D. Gatewood and J. B. Bill: 1997, 'Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 401–412.Google Scholar
  17. Schmitt, N. and R. Klimoski: 1991, Research Methods in Human Resources Management(South-Western, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
  18. Sharfman, M.: 1996, 'The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini Social Performance Ratings Data', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 287–296.Google Scholar
  19. Social Investment Forum, 1998: Social Investment Forum Announcements(Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  20. Stigler, G. J.: 1962, 'Information in the Labor Market', Journal of Political Economy 70, 49–73.Google Scholar
  21. Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening: 1997, 'Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees', Academy of Management Journal 40, 658–672.Google Scholar
  22. Waddock, S. A. and S. G. Graves: 1997, 'The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link', Strategic Management Journal 18, 303–319.Google Scholar
  23. Wolfe, R. and K. Aupperle: 1991, 'Introduction to CSP: Methods for Evaluating an Elusive Construct', in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12 ( JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 265–268.Google Scholar
  24. Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Review 16,691–718.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Schmidt Albinger
    • 1
  • Sarah J. Freeman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BusinessConcordia University WisconsinMequonU.S.A.
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations