Skip to main content

Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs

Abstract

Although the number of women in middle management has grown quite rapidly in the last two decades, the number of female CEOs in large corporations remains extremely low. This article examines many explanations for why women have not risen to the top, including lack of line experience, inadequate career opportunities, gender differences in linguistic styles and socialization, gender-based stereotypes, the old boy network at the top, and tokenism. Alternative explanations are also presented and analyzed, such as differences between female leadership styles and the type of leadership style expected at the top of organizations, feminist explanations for the underrepresentation of women in top management positions, and the possibility that the most talented women in business often avoid corporate life in favor of entrepreneurial careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adler, N. J.: 1993, 'Competitive Frontiers: Women Managers in the Triad', International Studies of Management and Organization 23(2), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. J. and D. N. Izraeli: 1994, Competitive Frontiers: Women Managers in a Global Economy (Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, E. R.: 1993, 'Demystifying the Glass Ceiling: Organizational and Interpersonal Dynamics of Gender Bias', Business and the Contemporary World 5, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S.: 1996, 'Up Against the Glass', Management Review (Sept.), 13–17.

  • Bok, D.: 1993, The Cost of Talent: How Executives and Professionals are Paid and How it Affects America (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., S. R. Vogel, D. M. Broverman, F. E. Clarkson and P. S. Rosencrantz.: 1972, 'Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal', Journal of Social Issues 28(2), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. A.: 1996, 'How High Can CEO Pay Go?', Business Week (April 22), 100–106.

  • Catalyst: 1990, Women in Corporate Management: Results of a Catalyst Survey (Catalyst, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M.: 1995, 'Women and Men, Morality and Ethics', Business Horizons ( July-Aug.), 61–68.

  • Derry, R.:1997, 'Feminism: How Does it Play in the Corporate Theater?', in A. Larson and R. Edward Freeman (eds.), Women's Studies and Business Ethics: Toward a New Conversation (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, K.: 1995, Life and Death in the Executive Fast Lane: Essays on Irrational Organizations and Their Leaders (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H. and S. J. Platz.: 1986, 'Sex Differences in Leadership: How Real Are They?', Academy of Management Review 11(1), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrsynski, J. H.: 1996, 'Women Pass Milestone in the Board Room', New York Times (Dec. 12), C4.

  • Eyring, A. and B. A. Stead: 1998, 'Shattering the Glass Ceiling: Some Successful Corporate Practices', Journal of Business Ethics vn 17, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. and J. J. Jackson: 1993, 'The Status of Women Managers in the United States', International Studies of Management and Organization 23(3), 88–107.

  • Ferguson, K.: 1984, The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierman, J.: 1990, 'Why Women Still Don't Hit the Top', Fortune ( July 30), 42.

  • Fisher, A. B.: 1992, 'When Will Women Get to the Top?', Fortune (Sept. 21), 44–56.

  • Fryxell, G. E. and L. D. Lerner: 1989, 'Contrasting Corporate Profiles: Women and Minority Representation in Top Management Positions', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, L. R.: 1991, 'Why Women Aren't Making It to the Top', Across the Board (April), 19–22.

  • Gardner, W. L., J. V. E. Peluchette and S. K. Clinebell: 1994, 'Valuing Women in Management: An Impression Management Perspective of Gender Diversity', Management Communication Quarterly 8(2), 115–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.: 1992, 'Discrimination at the Top', Working Woman (Sept.), 68–72.

  • Gutek, B.: 1985, Sex and the Workplace (Jossey Bass, San Franscisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., and M. H. Stopeck.: 1985, 'Attractiveness and Corporate Success: Different Causal Attributions for Males and Females', Journal of Applied Psychology vn 70, 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., C. J. Block, R. F. Martell and M. C. Simon: 1989, 'Has Anything Changed? Current Characterizations of Men, Women, and Managers', Journal of Applied Psychology 74(6), 935–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgesen, S.: 1990, The Female Advantage: Women's Ways of Leadership (Doubleday, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. H.: 1995, Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1978, Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. M. and G. Duerst-Lahti: 1995, 'The Study of Gender Power and its Link to Governance and Leadership', in R. M. Kelly and G. Duerst-Lahti (eds.), Gender Power, Leadership and Governance (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), pp. 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K.: 1990, 'Androgyny and Leadership Style', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A., and R. Edward Freeman: 1997, 'Introduction', in A. Larson and R. Edward Freeman (eds.), Women's Studies and Business Ethics: Toward a New Conversation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L.: 1991, 'Start With a Rational Group of People...: Gender Effects of Impression Management in Organizations', in R. A. Giacolone and P. Rosenfeld (eds.), Applied Impression Management: How Image-making Affects Managerial Decisions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), pp. 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J.: 1976, 'Toward a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions', in M. Blaxall and B. Regan (eds.), Women and the Workplace: The Implications of Occupational Segregation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) pp. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin, J. S.: 1996, 'Women at Top Still are Distant from CEO Jobs', Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28), B2, B8.

  • Lublin, J. S.:1998, 'Even Top Women Earn Less', Wall Street Journal (Nov. 10), B2.

  • Moore, D. P. and E. H. Buttner: 1997, Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M., R. P. White, E. Van Velsor and The Center for Creative Leadership: 1987, Breaking the Glass Ceiling (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M.: 1992, The New Leaders: Guidelines on Leadership Diversity in America (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work (Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F. and B. Gutek: 1980, 'Sex Effects on Evaluation', Academy of Management Review 5, 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann, L. R. and C. Beil.: 1992, 'Achievement Styles of Women Leaders and Their Peers: Toward an Understanding of Women and Leadership', Psychology of Women Quarterly vn 16, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N.: 1993, Women and Men in Management, 2nd. Ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, R. A.: 1995, '“Glass Ceiling” Still Too Hard to Crack, U.S. Panel Finds', Los Angeles Times (March 16), A1, A18.

  • Rosener, J. B.: 1990, 'Ways Women Lead', Harvard Business Review vn 68, 119–125.

  • Rosener, J. B.: 1995, America's Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. and C. Davies: 1994, 'Organizations Through the Lens of Gender: Introduction to the Special Issue', Human Relations 47(6), 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, A.: 1981, The Androgynous Manager (AMACOM, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhardt, T. D.: 1998, 'Business Schools Struggle to Lure More Women', Wall Street Journal (Nov. 10), B2.

  • Sheppard, D. L.: 1989, 'Organizations, Power and Sexuality: The Image and Self-image of Women Managers', in J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff and G. Burrell (eds.), The Sexuality of Organization (Sage, London), pp. 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, D. L.: 1992, 'Women Managers' Perceptions of Gender and Organizational Life', in A. J. Mills and P. Tancred (eds.), Gendering Organizational Analysis (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), pp. 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D.: 1994, Talking from 9 to 5: How Women's and Men's Conversational Styles Affect who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done (William Morrow & Co., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J., S. Jacobson, R. Jacques, N. Fondas and N. Steckler: 1995, 'We Just Don't Understand: Gendered Interaction and the Process of “Doing” Organizational Scholarship', Journal of Management Inquiry 4(2), 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A. and M. Savage: 1992, 'Theorethical Introduction: The Gender of Organizations', in A. Witz and M. Savage (eds.), Gender and Bureaucracy (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oakley, J.G. Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics 27, 321–334 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226129868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226129868

  • CEO
  • gender
  • leadership
  • management
  • senior
  • women