Skip to main content
Log in

Flowering may be controlled by a quantitative balance between flower-inducing and -inhibiting substances in Pharbitis nil

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phloem exudate prepared from induced cotyledons of Pharbitis nil (SD-PE) showed flower-inducing activity, and the exudate from cotyledons of P. nil grown under continuous illumination (CL-PE) expressed flower-inhibiting activity in apex cultures of P. nil. Following fractionation by ion exchange chromatography, the flower-inducing activity of SD-PE was located in the fraction adsorbed on anion exchange resin (Dowex); the flow-through (FT) fraction from anion and/or cation exchange resins used to separate CL-PE inhibited flowering. The flower-inducing and -inhibiting activities of both fractions from SD-PE and CL-PE were examined in detail. The FT fraction of SD-PE inhibited, and the Dowex fraction of CL-PE induced flowering. The flower-inducing activity of Dowex fraction of SD-PE was about 100 times higher than the same fraction of CL-PE, and the inhibiting activity of FT fraction of CL-PE was about 10 times higher than the same fraction of SD-PE. Therefore, flowering in P. nil may be controlled by a quantitative balance between flower-inducing and -inhibiting substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernier G, Kinet J-M and Sachs RM (1981) The Physiology of Flowering, Vol I. Boca Raton: CRC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleland CF (1974) Isolation of flower-inducing and flowerinhibitory factors from aphid honeydew. Plant Physiol 54: 899–903

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland CF and Ajami A (1974) Identification of the flowerinducing factor isolated from aphid honeydew as being salicylic acid. Plant Physiol 54: 904–906

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans LT (1960) Inflorescence initiation in Lolium temulentum L. 2. Evidence for inhibitory and promotive photoperiodic process involving transmissible products. Aust J Res 31: 555–566

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans LT (1962) Day-length control of inflorescence initiation in the grass Rottboellia exaltata L. f. Aust J Biol Sci 15: 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans LT and Wardlaw IF (1966) Independent translocation of 14C-labelled assimilates and of the floral stimulus in Lolium temulentum. Planta 68: 310–326

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guttridge CG (1959) Further evidence for growth-promoting and flower-inhibiting hormone in strawberry. Ann Bot 23: 612–621

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hander R, Westphal M and Behrens G (1949) Hemmung der Infloreszenbildung durch Langtag bei der Kurstagspflanze Kalanchoë blossfeldiana. Planta 36: 424–438

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodson HK and Hamner KC (1970) Floral inducing extract from Xanthium. Science 167: 384–385

    Google Scholar 

  10. Imamura S (1961) The nature of inhibition of flowering by the leaves illuminated continuously during the inductive dark treatment of other leaves in short-day. Recent Adv Bot 2: 1287–1288

    Google Scholar 

  11. Imamura S and Takimoto A (1956) Flowering responses in Pharbitis nil as influenced by the removal of photoperiodically induced leaves. Bot Mag Tokyo 69: 817–818

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishioka N, Tanimoto S and Harada H (1990) Flower-inducing activity of phloem exudate in cultured apices from Pharbitis seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 31: 705–709

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ishioka N, Tanimoto S and Harada H (1991) Flowerinducing activity of phloem exudates from Pharbitis cotyledons exposed to various photoperiods. Plant Cell Physiol 32: 921–924

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs WP (1980) Inhibition of flowering in short-day plants. In: Skoog F (ed) Plant Growth Substances 1979. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 301–309

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kavon DL and Zeevaart JAD (1979) Simultaneous inhibition of translocation of photosynthate and of the floral stimulus by localized low-temperature treatment in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil. Planta 144: 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  16. King RW and Zeevaart JAD (1973) Floral stimulus movement in Perilla and flower inhibition caused by non-induced leaves. Plant Physiol 51: 727–738

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kopcewicz J (1972) Oestrogens in the long-day plants Hyoscyamus niger and Salvia splendens grown under inductive and non-inductive light conditions. New Physiol 71: 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kopcewicz J (1972) Estrogen in the short-day plants Perilla ocimoides and Chenopodium rubrum grown under inductive and non-inductive light conditions. Z Pflanzenphysiol 67: 373–376

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kopcewicz J and Porazinski Z (1974) Effects of growth regulators, steroids and estrogen fraction from sage plants on flowering of a long-day plant, Salvia splendens, grown under non-inductive light conditions. Biol Plant 16: 132–135

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lang A (1965) Physiology of flower initiation. In: Rubland W (ed) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 1379–1536

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lang A (1980) Inhibition of flowering in long-day plants. In: Skoog F (ed) Plant Growth Substances 1979. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 310–322

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lang A, Chailakhyan MK and Frolova IA (1977) Promotion and inhibition of flowering in a day neutral plant in grafts with a short-day plant and a long-day plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 2412–2416

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lincoln RG, Cunningham A and Hamner KC (1964) Evidence for a florigenic acid. Nature 202: 559–561

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lincoln RG, Mayfield DL and Cunningham A (1961) Preparation of a floral initiating extract from Xanthium. Science 133: 756

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murashige T and Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ogawa Y and King RW (1979) Indirect action of benzyladenine and other chemicals on flowering of Pharbitis nil Chois. Plant Physiol 63: 643–649

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ogawa Y and King RW (1990) The inhibition of flowering by non-induced cotyledons of Pharbitis nil. Plant Cell Physiol 31: 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  28. Papafotiou M and Schwabe WW (1990) Studies on the longday inhibition of flowering in Xanthium and Kalanchoe. Physiol Plant 80: 177–184

    Google Scholar 

  29. Purse JG (1984) Phloem exudate of Perilla crispa and its effects on flowering of P. crispa shoot explants. J Exp Bot 35: 227–238

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zeevaart JAD (1976) Physiology of flower formation. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 27: 321–348

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeevaart JAD, Brede JM and Cetas CB (1977) Translocation patterns in Xanthium in relation to long-day inhibition of flowering. Plant Physiol 60: 747–753

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondoh, M., Fukusada, Y., Murakami, A. et al. Flowering may be controlled by a quantitative balance between flower-inducing and -inhibiting substances in Pharbitis nil. Plant Growth Regulation 28, 101–106 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006223629272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006223629272

Navigation