Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present a business ethics case from the viewpoint of discursive ethics. Dialogue and subsequent agreement constitute two key ideas of European identity and are two basic concepts of discursive ethics thinking. Our choice for this type of approach was determined by several reasons, of which there are three that should be pointed out, as they can be considered an heritage of the European way of thinking:
1) the need for a rational dialogue, in which all those affected -- or, failing that, the people acting in their name -- are represented, as a way to find solutions to conflicts;
2) the importance of respecting a set of conditions ensuring equal opportunities and total symmetry among the participants; and
3) obliged respect for the universalization principle, which establishes that a decision is morally correct when it can or could be accepted by all those whom it affects, present or future.
In order to present this case, the following steps are taken. Firstly, a brief summary of the case will be provided, defining the different ways of approaching the problem and the resulting map of interests. Secondly, the different interests and values, which came into play, are analysed. Finally, we go over the different approaches that were made to reach a solution before considering dialogue, which turned out to be the most decisive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aedenat: 1994a, ‘El proceso por delito ecológico contra la Central Térmica de Teruel’, Informe (Junio).
Aedenat: 1994b, ‘Régimen jurídico de la contaminación atmosférica’, Informe (Junio).
Agreement signed on July 13.
Apel, K. O.: 1991, Ética comunicativa y democracia (Crítica, Barcelona).
Cortina, A.: 1993, Ética aplicada y democracia radical (Madrid, Tecnos).
Dossier from Records of the Valencian Parliamentary Sessions from 1980 to 1996.
Dossier of interviews carried out in 1997 with interest groups in the Endesa Case (internal document).
Endesa (ed.): 1994, Gestión Ambiental de Endesa 1944–1994 (Endesa, Madrid).
Endesa (ed.): 1995, Centro Productor de Andorra. Teruel (Madrid, Endesa).
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Toronto).
García-Marzá, D. (Dir.), C. Ferrete and E. González: 1998, El conflicto ecológico de la Central Térmica de Andorra. Teruel: Un caso de Ética Empresarial (Jaume I University, Castellón).
García-Marzá, D. and E. González: 1997, ‘An ethical normative approach of stakeholder analysis’, in First Euro-conference on Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, The Netherlands on September 15–16.
García-Marzá, D.: 1992, Ética de la justicia, J. Habermas y la ética discursiva (Tecnos, Madrid).
Habermas, J.: 1991, Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidad (Paidós, Barcelona).
Husserl, E.: 1991, ‘La crisis de la humanidad europea y la filosofía’, in La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental (Crética, Barcelona).
Millán Millán, M. and Ma.. J. Sanz: 1993, La contaminación atmosférica en la Comunidad Valenciana: Estado de conocimientos sobre los problemas en el Maestrazgo y Els Ports de Castellón (Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo, Valencia, Julio).
Toharia, M.: 1993, Estudio medioambiental. El Maestrat y Els Ports (Madrid).
Weiss, J. W.: 1994, Business Ethics. A Managerial Stakeholder Approach (Wadswokrth Publishing Company, California).
Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpää: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation. A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value (Pitman Publishing, Southport).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García-Marzá, D., Sarria, C.F. & Esteban, E.G. Across-the-border Contamination, The Andorra Power Plant (Teruel): A Business Ethics Case. Journal of Business Ethics 22, 261–271 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006211301240
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006211301240