Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a scanning protocol was developed to image the arterial bed of the pelvis and both legs along their entire length in patients with peripheral arterial disease, using standard hard-and software. Three adjacent stations are acquired consecutively, with some small overlap; per station; one Gadolinium contrast bolus is administered. The scanning protocol was optimized in an in vitro phantom study. The optimal flip angle was found to be 50°. Also, the optimal scan delay was chosen to be equal to the arrival time of the contrast bolus thereby minimizing artifacts. Three contrast bolus injections showed sufficient enhancement of the vessels after image subtraction. Finally, stenosis quantification by manual caliper was performed by five observers in the MRA images and correlated with the percent diameter reduction determined by quantitative angiography from corresponding X-ray images. The results of the MRA measurements were reproducible and intra- and inter-observer variabilities were statistically non-significant (p = 0.54 and p = 0.12, respectively). Stenosis quantification performed by four observers showed a good correlation with the X-ray derived values (r p > 0.90, p < 0.02); the results from one observer were not significantly correlated. Five patients with proven peripheral disease were investigated with this new MRA scanning protocol. The images were of good quality which allowed adequate clinical evaluation; the original diagnoses obtained from X-ray examinations, were confirmed with MRA. In conclusion, peripheral arterial disease can be evaluated adequately with this MR scanning protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 877-81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, Chenevert TL, Williams DM, Marx MV, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197: 785-92.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Jacoby WT, Williams DM, Cho KJ, Marx MV, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR 1996; 166: 1387-97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Snidow JJ, Aisen AM, Harris VJ, Tretotola SO, Johnson MS, Sawchuk AP, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995; 196: 371-8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villiard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995; 165: 431-7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adamis MK, Li W, Wielopolski PA, Kim D, Sax EJ, Kent KC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Radiology 1995; 196: 689-95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191: 155-64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 642-51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996; 201: 705-10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TKF, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997; 203: 109-14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 551-556.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, Huston III J, Jack CR, Julsrud PR, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 551-6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hendrick RE, Haacke EM. Basic physics of MR contrast agents and maximization of image contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 137-48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Zwet PMJ, von Land CD, Loois G, Gerbrands JJ, Reiber JHC. An on-line system for the quantitative analysis of coronary arterial segments. Comput cardiol 1990; 157-160.

  15. Reiber JHC, van der Zwet PMJ, von Land CD, Koning G, van Meurs B, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE. Quantitative coronary arteriography: equipment and technical requirements. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, editors. Advances in quantitative coronary arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993; 75-111.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Debatin FJ, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, Beam C, Svetkey LP, Newman GE, et al. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 1991; 157: 981-90.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1993; 187: 627-35.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1993; 187: 637-41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst V, van Baalen J, van Bockel JH, van Erkel AR, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 202: 333-38.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urchuk SN, Plewes DB. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 453-62.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schiebler ML, Listerud J, Baum RA, Carpenter J, Weigele J, Holland G, et al. Magnetic resonance arteriography of the pelvis and lower extremities. Magn Reson Quat 1993; 9: 152-87.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gatenby JC, McCauley TR, Gore JC. Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. Med Phys 1993; 20: 1049-57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gatenby JC, Gore JC. Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. Jt Magn Reson Series B 1994; 104: 119-26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 193-9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fürst G, Hofer M, Sitzer M, Kahn T, Müller E, Mödder U. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 692-9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Westenberg JJM, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MNJM, Doornbos J, Pattynama PMT, de Roos A, et al. Objective stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiographic datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 249-60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 163-9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parker DL, Goodrich KC, Buswell HR, Alexander AL, Chapman BE, Tsuruda J, et al. Imaging parameter optimization in Gd. enhanced MRA. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: sixth scientific meeting and exhibition, vol. 1, Sydney, Australia 18–24 April 1998, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

    Jos J.M. Westenberg, Rob J. van der Geest & Johan H.C. Reiber

  2. Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

    Martin N.J.M. Wasser, Peter M.T. Pattynama & Albert de Roos

  3. Department of Medical Informatics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

    Jan Vanderschoot

Authors
  1. Jos J.M. Westenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin N.J.M. Wasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rob J. van der Geest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter M.T. Pattynama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Albert de Roos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan Vanderschoot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Johan H.C. Reiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westenberg, J.J., Wasser, M.N., Geest, R.J.v.d. et al. Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 15, 161–173 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006166330001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006166330001

Search

Navigation