Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

French Body-Parts and the Semantics of Binding

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the grammar of the French Inalienable Possession Construction (IPC). It is argued that the IPC involves an unexpressed reflexive anaphor. The antecedent of this reflexive anaphor must satisfy a semantic condition which requires consideration of thematic lexical entailments. The model-theoretic nature of this constraint suggests that the range of semantic information relevant to syntactic processes goes beyond the formal configuration of semantic metalanguages. It also shows that the semantic conditions which anaphors can impose on their antecedents are not restricted to thematic ranking or center of perspective restrictions. An analysis of the construction within Head-driven Phrase-Structure Grammar is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Authier, Jean-Marc: 1988, The Syntax of Unselective Binding, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Authier, Jean-Marc: 1990, ‘Null Subjects in the DP, and Inalienable Construal in French’, in Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Authier, Jean-Marc: 1992, ‘Is French a Null Subject Language in the DP?’, Probus 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L.: 1970, ‘Double Negatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 168–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Betsy: 1985, ‘A Functional Explanation of French Nonlexical Datives’, Studies in Language 9, 159–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych-verbs and Theta-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’, in Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 292–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1995, The Dynamics of Meaning, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary: 1993, The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Anthony: 1996, Lexical Semantics and Linking in the Hierarchical Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Davis, Anthony and Jean-Pierre Koenig: To appear, ‘Sublexical Modality and Linking Theory’, Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

  • Dowty, David: 1989, ‘On the Semantic Content of the Notion of “Thematic Role”’, in Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee and Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, Types, and Meaning, vol. 2, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 69–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1991, ‘Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67, 547–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Mürvet: 1989, ‘Pronouns, Licensing, and Binding’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 51–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabeth: 1990, ‘Argument Roles and Anaphora’, in Robin Cooper, Kuniaki Mukai, and John Perry (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Patrick: 1994, ‘Causative Binding and the Minimal Distance Principle’, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles: 1986, ‘Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora’, in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles and Paul Kay: (forthcoming), Construction Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

  • Goldberg, Adele: 1995, Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Agrument Structure, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéron, Jacqueline: 1985, ‘Inalienable Possession, PRO-Inclusion and Lexical Chains’, in Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical Representation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 42–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, Anna: 1944a, ‘Il me prend le bras vs. II prend mon bras’, Romanic Review 35, 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, Anna: 1944b, ‘It tend les mains vs. Il tend ses mains’, Studies in Philology 41, 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford, pp. 114–125.

  • Hellan, Lars: 1988, Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1975, ‘Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon’, Language 51, 639–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1992, ‘Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Paul: 1994, ‘Anaphoric Binding in Construction Grammar’, in Proceedings of the Twentieth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1991, ‘Anaphora Invariants and Language Universals’, in Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Jean-Pierre: 1999, Lexical Relations, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, William: 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Ladusaw, William and David Dowty: 1988, ‘Towards a Nongrammatical Account of Thematic Roles’, in: Wendy Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relarions, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George: 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald: 1984, ‘Active Zones’, in Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, pp. 172–188.

  • Langacker, Ronald: 1987, Poundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclère, Christian: 1975, ‘Datifs syntaxiques et datif éthique’, in Jacques Chevalier and Maurice Gross (eds.), Méthodes en syntaxe française, Hermann, Paris, pp. 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth: 1993, English Verb Classes and Alternations, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Chris and Ivan Sag: 1998, ‘Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations’, in Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig and Andreas Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, Maria Rita: 1983, ‘On Control and Control Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 421–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, Maria Rita and Kenneth Wexler: 1987, ‘Parameters, Binding, and Learnability’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 413–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James: 1983, ‘What's with with?’, Language 59, 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, Mary Catherine: 1996, ‘The Situated Interpretation of Possessor Raising’, in Sandra Thompson and Masayoshi Shibatani (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meanting, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven: 1989, Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1992, ‘Anaphors in English and the of Binding Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 261–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase-Structure Grammar, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul: 1971, Cross-over Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Lisa: 1996, Toward Logical Form, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1986, ‘Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Susan: 1983, The Syntactic Forms of Predication, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Ruwet, Nicolas: 1972, Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du fançais, Editions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwet, Nicolas: 1982, ‘Le datif épistémique en français et la Condition d'opacité de Chomsky’, in: Grammaire des insultes et autres études, Seuil, Paris, pp. 172–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan and Carl Pollard: 1991, ‘An Integrated Theory of Complement Control’, Language 67, 63–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan: 1997, ‘English Relative Clauses’, Journal of Linguistics 33, 431–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, Peter: 1987, ‘Aspects of Logophoricity’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 445–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin, Robert: 1993, ‘A Synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar’, in Robert van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, Jean-Roger and Maria-Luiza Zubizaretta: 1992, ‘The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and English’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 595–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, Stephen: 1995, The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics Department, SUNY at Buffalo, 685 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14260-1030 e-mail

    Jean-Pierre Koenig

Authors
  1. Jean-Pierre Koenig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenig, JP. French Body-Parts and the Semantics of Binding. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17, 219–265 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006147902568

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006147902568

Keywords

Search

Navigation