Abstract
Forecasts of air quality provide information to the general public during periods with high levels of air pollution. Criteria for testing the validity and reliability of forecast systems are discussed. As the objectives of a forecast may widely differ (providing information to the public or triggering short-term emission reduction measures) there is not a single evaluation procedure. It is recommended to use a set of performance indicators. The strong year-to-year variability in occurrence of smog episodes makes it necessarily to use several years of data in the evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bel, L., Bellanger, L., Bonneau, V., Ciuperca, G., Dacunha-Castelle, D., Deniau, C., Ghattas, B., Gilibert, E., Lameloise, P., Misiti, M., Misiti, Y., Oppenheim, G., Poggi, J. M. and Tomassone, R.: 1998, Prevision des niveaux maximum d'ozone en agglomeration Parisienne. Paper presented at the World Clean Air Congress, September 1998, Durban.
Cassmassi, J. C.: 1987, Development of an objective ozone forecast model for the South coast air basin. Paper presented at the 80th annual meeting of APCA, New York, June 21-26, 1987.
Doswell, C.A. III, Jones, R. and Keller D. L.: 1990, On summary measures of forecast skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables, Weather Forecasting 5, 576.
EC (1992) Council Directive on air pollution by ozone, 92/72/EEC, Official Journal of the European Community, No. L 297/1-7.
Fromage, A.: 1996. Prévision des pointes de pollution atmosphérique: état de l'art dans le monde et perspectives pour la région Ile-de-France, Airparif, Paris.
Guicherit, R. and Van Dop, H.: 1977, Photochemical production of ozone in Western Europe (1971-1975) and its relation to meteorology. Atmospheric Environment 11, 145.
Hanssen, A. W. and Kuiper, W. J. A.: 1965, On the relationship between the frequency of rain and various meteorological parameters. Meded. Verh. 81, 2.
Karl, T.; 1979, Potential application of model output statistics (MOS) to forecasts of surface ozone concentrations, J. Applied Meteor. 18, 254.
McCollister, G. M. and Wilson, K. R.: 1975, Linear stochastic models for forecasting daily maxima and hourly concentrations of air pollutants, Atmospheric Environment 9, 417.
Murphy, A. H. and Daan, H.: 1985, Forecast evaluation, in A. H. Murphy and R. W. Katz (eds), Probability, Statistics and Decision Making in the Atmospheric Sciences, Westview, Boulder, CO, pp. 379-437.
Revlett, G-H.: 1978, Ozone forecasting using empirical modeling, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28, 338.
Van Aalst, R. M. and De Leeuw, F. A. A. M. (eds): 1997, National ozone forecast systems and international data exchange in Northwest Europe. European Topic Centre on Air Quality, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Wilks, D.S., 1995, Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. An introduction, Academic Press, San Diego.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Leeuw, F.A. Criteria for Evaluation of Smog Forecast Systems. Environ Monit Assess 60, 1–14 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006138226145
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006138226145