Skip to main content
Log in

Criteria for Evaluation of Smog Forecast Systems

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forecasts of air quality provide information to the general public during periods with high levels of air pollution. Criteria for testing the validity and reliability of forecast systems are discussed. As the objectives of a forecast may widely differ (providing information to the public or triggering short-term emission reduction measures) there is not a single evaluation procedure. It is recommended to use a set of performance indicators. The strong year-to-year variability in occurrence of smog episodes makes it necessarily to use several years of data in the evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bel, L., Bellanger, L., Bonneau, V., Ciuperca, G., Dacunha-Castelle, D., Deniau, C., Ghattas, B., Gilibert, E., Lameloise, P., Misiti, M., Misiti, Y., Oppenheim, G., Poggi, J. M. and Tomassone, R.: 1998, Prevision des niveaux maximum d'ozone en agglomeration Parisienne. Paper presented at the World Clean Air Congress, September 1998, Durban.

  • Cassmassi, J. C.: 1987, Development of an objective ozone forecast model for the South coast air basin. Paper presented at the 80th annual meeting of APCA, New York, June 21-26, 1987.

  • Doswell, C.A. III, Jones, R. and Keller D. L.: 1990, On summary measures of forecast skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables, Weather Forecasting 5, 576.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1992) Council Directive on air pollution by ozone, 92/72/EEC, Official Journal of the European Community, No. L 297/1-7.

  • Fromage, A.: 1996. Prévision des pointes de pollution atmosphérique: état de l'art dans le monde et perspectives pour la région Ile-de-France, Airparif, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guicherit, R. and Van Dop, H.: 1977, Photochemical production of ozone in Western Europe (1971-1975) and its relation to meteorology. Atmospheric Environment 11, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, A. W. and Kuiper, W. J. A.: 1965, On the relationship between the frequency of rain and various meteorological parameters. Meded. Verh. 81, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T.; 1979, Potential application of model output statistics (MOS) to forecasts of surface ozone concentrations, J. Applied Meteor. 18, 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollister, G. M. and Wilson, K. R.: 1975, Linear stochastic models for forecasting daily maxima and hourly concentrations of air pollutants, Atmospheric Environment 9, 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. H. and Daan, H.: 1985, Forecast evaluation, in A. H. Murphy and R. W. Katz (eds), Probability, Statistics and Decision Making in the Atmospheric Sciences, Westview, Boulder, CO, pp. 379-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revlett, G-H.: 1978, Ozone forecasting using empirical modeling, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28, 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst, R. M. and De Leeuw, F. A. A. M. (eds): 1997, National ozone forecast systems and international data exchange in Northwest Europe. European Topic Centre on Air Quality, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D.S., 1995, Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. An introduction, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Leeuw, F.A. Criteria for Evaluation of Smog Forecast Systems. Environ Monit Assess 60, 1–14 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006138226145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006138226145

Navigation