Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insertional inactivation of the tomato polygalacturonase gene

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The site-selected insertion (SSI) procedure was used to generate insertional knockout mutations in the gene for tomato polygalacturonase (PG), a critical enzyme in fruit ripening. Previously, it had been shown that the Dissociation (Ds) elements in a select group of tomato plants frequently inserted into PG, at least in somatic tissues. DNA isolated from pollen produced by progeny of these plants was screened by SSI to identify plants likely to transmit the insertions in PG to progeny. These results identified one family as likely candidate for yielding germinally transmitted insertions. Four thousand progeny were screened and five were found containing germinally transmitted Ds insertions in PG, one of which contained two Ds insertions in PG. The Ds elements were stabilized by genetically removing the transposase and four of the five insertions were recovered as homozygous in the next generation. Enzymatic analysis of fruit from these individuals demonstrated that there was at least a 1000-fold reduction in polygalacturonase levels in those plants bearing Ds insertions in PG exons. Individuals with modified PG sequences due to the sequence footprint, resulting from excision of the element, were identified using the single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) method. Enzymatic analysis of fruit from a plant homozygous for one such excision allele showed a significant reduction in polygalacturonase activity. Since there is no transgenic material left in PG, this demonstrates the ability to modify a gene of commercial value in planta and subsequently removing all transgenic material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdul-Baki AA: Determination of pollen viability in tomato. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 117: 473–476 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali ZM, Brady CJ: Purification and characterization of the polygalacturonases of tomato fruits. Aust J Plant Physiol 9: 155–169 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almin EK, Eriksson KE: Enzymic degradation of polymers I. viscometric method for the determination of enymic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 139: 238–247 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kinston RE, Moore DD, Smith JA, Seidman JG, Struhl K: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Green Publishing Associates/Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballinger DG, Benzer S: Targeted gene mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 9402–9406 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belzile F, Yoder JI: Pattern of somatic transposition in a high copy Ac tomato line. Plant J 2: 173–179 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson RJ, Johal GS, Crane VC, Tossberg JT, Schnable PS, Meeley RB, Briggs SP: Cloning and characterization on the Maize An1 gene. Plant Cell 7: 75–84 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernatzy R, Tanksley SD: Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887–898 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bird CR, Smith CJ, Ray JA, Moureau P, Bevan MW, Hughes S, Morris PC, Grierson D, Schuch W: The tomato polygalacturonase gene and ripening-specific expression in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 11: 651–662 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourque JE: Antisense strategies for genetic manipulations in plants. Plant Sci 105: 125–149 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carey AT, Holt K, Picard S, Wilde R, Tucker GA, Bird CR, Schuch W, Seymour GB: Tomato exo–(1–4)-β-D-galactanase. Isolation, changes during ripening in normal and mutant tomato fruit, and characterization of a related cDNA clone. Plant Physiol 108: 1099–1107 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J, Greenblatt IM, Dellaporta SL: Molecular analysis of Ac transposition and DNA replication. Genetics 130: 665–676 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Church GM, Gilbert W: Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 81: 1991–1995 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooley MB, Goldsbrough AP, Still DW, Yoder JI: Site-selected insertional mutagenesis of tomato with maize Ac and Ds elements. Mol Gen Genet 252: 184–194 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Das L, Martienssen R: Site-selected transposon mutagenesis at the hcf106 locus in maize. Plant Cell 7: 287–294 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dellapenna D, Kates DS, Bennett AB: Polygalacturonase gene expression in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr tomato fruits. Plant Physiol 85: 502–507 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Denhardt DT: Mechanism of action of antisense RNA. Sometime inhibition of transcription, processing, transport, or translation. Ann NY Acad Sci 660: 70–76 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixon RA, Lamb CJ, Masoud S, Sewalt VJH, Paiva NL: Metabolic engineering: prospects for crop improvement through the genetic manipulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and defense responses - a review. Gene 179: 61–71 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS: ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 4008–4008 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dooner HK, Belachew A, Burgess D, Harding S, Ralston M, Ralston E: Distribution of unlinked receptor sites for transposed Ac elements from the bz-m2(ac) allele in maize. Genetics 136: 261–279 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldsbrough AP, Lastrella CN, Yoder JI: Transposition mediated re-positioning and subsequent elimination of marker genes from transgenic tomato. Bio/technology 11: 1286–1292 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzales-Bosch C, Brummell DA, Bennett AB: Differential expression of two endo-1,4-β-glucanase genes in pericarp and locules of wild-type and mutant tomato fruit. Plant Physiol 111: 1313–1319 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gross KC: A rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method for assaying polygalacturonase using 2-cyanoacetamide. Horti Science 17: 933–934 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jorgensen RA: Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression states. Science 268: 686–691 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koes R, Souer E, van Houwelingen A, Mur L, Spelt C, Quattrocchio F, Wing J, Oppedijk B, Ahmed S, Maes T, Gerats T, Hoogeven P, Meesters M, Kloos D, Mol JNM: Targeted gene inactivation in petunia by PCR-based selection of transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 8149–8153 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kramer MG, Redenbaugh K: Commercialization of a tomato with an antisense polygalacturonase gene: the Flavr Savr tomato story. Euphytica 79: 293–297 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lisch D, Chomet P, Freeling M: Genetic characterization of the Mutator system in maize: behavior and regulation of mu transposons in a minimal line. Genetics 139: 1777–1796 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazur BJ: Commercializing the products of plant biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 13: 319–323 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. McKinney EC, Nazeem A, Traut A, Feldmann KA, Belostotsky DA, McDowell JM, Meagher RB: Sequence-based identification of T-DNA insertion mutations in Arabidopsis: actin mutants act2–1 and act4–1. Plant J 8: 613–622 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mena M, Ambrose BA, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ: Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science 274: 1537–1540 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meyer P: Variation of transgene expression in plants. Euphytica 85: 359–366 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mizrahi Y, Zohar R, Malis-Arad S: Effect of sodium chloride on fruit ripening of the nonripening mutants nor and rin. Plant Physiol 69: 497–501 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nevers P, Shepherd NS, Saedler H: Plant transposable elements. Adv Bot Res 12: 103–203 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T, Hayashi K: Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics 5: 874–879 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Osborne BI, Corr CA, Prince JP, Hehl R, Tanksley SD, Mc-Cormick S, Baker B: Ac transposition from a T-DNA can generate linked and unlinked clusters of insertions in the tomato genome. Genetics 129: 833–844 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rushforth AM, Saari B, Anderson P: Site-selected Insertion of the transposon Tc1 into a Caenorhabditis elegans myosin light chain gene. Mol Cell Biol 13: 902–910 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scherczinger CA, Yates AA, Knecht DA: Variables affecting antisense RNA inhibition of gene expression. Ann NY Acad Sci 660: 45–56 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schuch W: Improving tomato quality through biotechnology. Food Technol 48: 78 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sheehy RE, Kramer M, Hiatt WR: Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 8805–8809 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Smith CJS, Watson CF, Ray J, Bird CR, Morris PC, Schuch W, Grierson D: Antisense RNA inhibition of polygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes. Nature 334: 724–726 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith CJS, Watson CF, Morris PC, Bird CR, Seymour GB, Gray JE, Arnold C, Tucker GA, Schuch W, Harding S, Grierson D: Inheritance and effect on ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Mol Biol 14: 369–379 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tabler M: Antisense RNA in plants: A tool for analysis and suppression of gene function. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, Tran Thanh Van K (eds), Morphogenesis in Plants, pp. 237–258. Plenum Press, New York (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Walbot V: The Mutator transposable element family of maize. In: Setlow JK (ed) Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, pp. 49–82. Plenum Press, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Walbot V: Strategies for mutagenesis and gene cloning using transposon tagging and T-DNA insertional mutagenesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 43: 49–82 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yoder JI: Rapid proliferation of the maize transposable element Activator in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell 2: 723–730 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08855, USA

    Michael B. Cooley & John I. Yoder

Authors
  1. Michael B. Cooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John I. Yoder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooley, M.B., Yoder, J.I. Insertional inactivation of the tomato polygalacturonase gene. Plant Mol Biol 38, 521–530 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006086004262

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006086004262

Search

Navigation