Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of X-irradiation on adventitious bud regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of Rosa hybrida

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of X-radiation on regeneration of adventitious buds on in vitro leaf explants of three Rosa hybrida L. genotypes was studied. In vitro leaflet explants of roses produced adventitious buds when cultured in the dark for 1 week on Murashige and Skoog (MS) induction medium containing 6.8 μM thidiazuron (TDZ) + 0.49 μM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and subsequently transferred to MS regeneration medium containing 2.2 μM benzyladenine (BA) + 0.049 μM IBA in the presence of reduced light, at 15 μmol m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Analysis of radiosensitivity by irradiating leaf explants with increasing doses of X-rays between 25 and 100 Gray (Gy) resulted in a decreasing rate of leaf explants regenerating buds from 47% to 0% respectively. The lethal dose for 50% of the regenerating explants (LD50) in all the three genotypes was estimated to be 25 Gy at a dose rate 2 Gy/s. For the main experiment, doses of 5 and 15 Gy were selected and variations were observed between genotypes. Clone RUI 317 had the highest rate of adventitious bud regeneration, with 83.6% (2.5 buds/explant) at 5 Gy and 64% (1.8 buds/explant) at 15 Gy, compared to 89% (3.4 buds/explant) with the untreated control. Significant differences in the percentage of bud regeneration of the three genotypes were only observed at 15 Gy in comparison to the control and the number of buds formed per regenerating explant varied between 1 to 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker BS & Bhatia SK (1993) Factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of quince (Cydonia oblonga). Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 35: 273–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broertjes C (1968) Dose rate effects in Saintpaulia. Mutations in Plant Breeding II (pp 63–71). IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Broertjes C (1969) Mutation breeding of Streptocarpus. Euphytica 18: 333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broertjes C & Leffring L (1972) Mutation breeding of Kalanchoë. Euphytica 21: 48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broertjes C, Haccius B & Weidlich S (1968) Adventitious bud formation on isolated leaves and its significance for mutation breeding. Euphytica 17: 321–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broertjes C & Van Harten AM (1978) Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DCW & Thorpe TA (1986) Plant regeneration by organogenesis. In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol 3 (pp 49–65). Academic Press, Orlando, Fl

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J & Karper JJ (1975) X-ray induced mutations in Begonia × hiemalis. Euphytica 24: 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois LAM & De Vries DP (1995) Preliminary report on direct regeneration of adventitious buds on leaf explants of in vivo grown glasshouse rose cultivars. Gartenbauwissenschaft 60(6): 249–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Famiani F, Ferradini N, Staffolani P & Standardi A (1994) Effect of leaf excision time and age, BA concentration and dark treatments on in vitro shoot regeneration of M.26 apple rootstock. J. Hort. Sci. 69(4): 679–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Huetteman CA & Preece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 33: 105–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (1972) Induced Mutation and Plant Improvement (pp 526–544). IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Hossain M, Joarder OI & Karim MR (1993) Adventitious shoot formation on excised leaf explants of in vitro grown seedlings of Aegle marmelos Corr. J. Hort. Sci. 68: 495–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerzy M & Zalewska M (1996) Polish cultivars of Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev and Gerbera jamesonii Bolus bred in vitro by induced mutations. Mutation Breeding Newsletter, No 42 (pp 19). IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Lainé E & David A (1994) Regeneration of plants from leaf explants of micropropagated clonal Eucalyptus grandis. Plant Cell Rep. 13: 473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laneri U, Franconi R & Altavista P (1990) Somatic mutagenesis of Gerbera jamesonii hybrid: irradiation and in vitro cultures. Acta Hort. 280: 395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Mante S, Scorza R & Cordts JM (1989) Plant regeneration from cotyledons of Prunus persica, Prunus domestic, and Prunus cerasus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 19: 1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondelaers W, Van Laere K, Goedefroot A & Van den Bossche K (1996) The Gent University 15 MeV high-current linear electron accelerator facility. Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Res. A 368: 278–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 15: 473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor EE & Johnson B (1937) A histological study of vegetative reproduction in Saintpaulia ionantha. Am. J. Bot. 24: 673–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederwieser JG & Van Staden J (1990) The relationship between genotype, tissue age and endogenous cytokinin levels on adventitious bud formation on leaves of Lachenalia. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 22: 223–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preil W (1986) In vitro propagation and breeding of ornamental plants: advantages and disadvantages of variability. In: Horn W, Jensen CJ, Odenbach W & Scheider O (eds) Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding (pp 377–403). Proc. EUCARPA Int. Symp. Berlin, 1985, EUCARPA, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju EC, Patel JD & Shah JJ (1986) Effect of gamma irradiation on morphology of leaf and shoot apex of ginger, tumeric, and mango ginger. Proc. of the Indian Acad. Sci. 89(3): 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow AH, Sparrow RC & Schairer LA (1960) The use of X-rays to induce somatic mutations in Saintpaulia. African Violet Mag. 13(4): 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • STSC Inc. (1987) STATGRAFICS Users' Guide

  • Thorpe TA & Patel KR (1984) Clonal propagation: adventitious buds. In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol 1 (pp 49–60). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubiana M, Dutreix J & Wambersie A (1986) Radiobiologie. Hermann, Editeurs des Sciences et des Arts, Paris. In: Fereol L, Louis S & Luce L (1996) Effects of Gamma Radiation on in vitro Plantlets of Alpinia Purpurata J. Hort. Sci. 71(2): 243–247

  • Van Laere K & Mondelaers W (1997) Design of flattening filters for a high-power bremsstrahlung converter by full Monte Carlo simulation. Rad. Phy. Chem. 49(3): 307–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walther F & Sauer A (1986) Analysis of radiosensitivity: A basic requirement for in vitro somatic mutagenesis. II. Gerbera jamesonii. Proc. Int. Symp. Nuclear Techniques and in vitro Culture for Plant Improvement (pp 155–159). IAEA/FAO, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, R., Mondelaers, W. & Debergh, P.C. Effects of X-irradiation on adventitious bud regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of Rosa hybrida. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 54, 37–44 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006072205608

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006072205608

Navigation