Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of 24,444 surgical specimens accessioned over 55 years in an ophthalmic pathology laboratory

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize the pathologic diagnoses of a large number of surgically-obtained specimens over an extended time period in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory. Methods: We analyzed the records of 24,444 surgically obtained specimens accessioned in the L.F. Montgomery Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Emory University, Atlanta, GA between May 1941 and December 1995. Age, sex, topography,clinical procedure, and histologic diagnosis were entered into a database using the modified SNOMED coding system. The diagnosis of the surgically enucleated eyes were analyzed with respect to years of enucleation. Results: The most common topographic area associated with a histologic diagnosis was the cornea (39.3%), followed by lens (16.0%), vitreous (12.0%),uvea (9.8%), eyelids (8.0%), conjunctiva(7.7%), retina (7.7%), and orbit(2.1%). The relative proportion of vitreous specimens has continuously increased and became the most common surgical specimen in 1995. The most common underlying disease of surgically enucleated eyes is trauma (40.9%), followed by ocular neoplasia (24.2%), ‘surgical‘ diseases of the cornea,lens and retina including glaucoma (17.3%), vascular diseases(6.7%), and inflammatory conditions (6.7%). The relative frequency of trauma and ocular inflammation as a cause of enucleation decreased significantly (p < 0.05) over the time of the study period while the relative proportion of ocular neoplastic processes increased (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: The availability of new surgical techniques has caused a change in the relative frequencies of different ocular specimens submitted for histologic examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous. The Australian corneal graft registry. 1990 to 1992 report. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1993; 21 (Suppl): 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allington HV, Allington JH. Eyelid tymors. Arch Dermatol 1968: 97: 50–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arentsen JJ, Morgan B, Green WR. Changing indications for keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1976; 81: 313–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ash JE. Epibulbar tumors. Am J Ophthalmol 1950; 33: 1203–1219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doxanas MT, Green WT, Arentsen JJ, Elsas FJ. Lid lesions of childhood: a histopathologic survey at the Wilmer Institute (1923–1974). J Pediatr Ophthalmol 1976; 13: 7–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Font RL, Laucirica R, Ramzy I. Cytology evaluation of tumors of the orbit and ocular adnexa: an analysis of 84 cases studied by the ’squash technique’. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 10: 135–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grossniklaus HE, Green WR, Luckenbach M, Chan CC. Conjunctival lesions in adults. A clinical and histopathological review. Cornea 1987; 6: 78–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossniklaus HE, McLean IW. Cutaneous melanoma of the eyelid. Clinicopathologic features. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1867–1873.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy RE. An evaluation of 820 orbital cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1984; 82: 134–155.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang GK, Naumann GOH. The frequency of corneal dystrophies requiring keratoplasty in Europe and the USA. 1987; 6: 209–211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luthra CL, Doxanas MT, Green WR. Lesions of the caruncle: a clinicohistopathologic study. Surv Ophthalmol 1978; 23: 183–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Polito E, Leccisotti A. Epithelial malignancies of the lacrimal gland: survival rates after extensive and conservative therapy. Ann Ophthalmol 1993; 25: 422–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reese AB. The treatment of expanding lesions of the orbit: with particular regard to those arising in the lacrimal gland, The Seventh Arthur J. Bedell Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1956; 41: 3–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohrbach JM, Steuhl KP, Thiel H-J. 125 Jahre Ophthalmopathologie in Tübingen. Wandel der Zeiten und der Befundspektren. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1992; 201: 200–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olurin O. Causes of enucleation in Nigeria. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 76: 987–991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rootman J. Disease of the Orbit: a multidisciplinary approach Philadelphia. JB Lippincott Co, 1988: 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, Rathmell JP. Clinicopathologic review of 142 cases of lacrimal gland lesions. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 431–435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shields CL, Shields JA. Tumors of the caruncle. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1993; 33: 31–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shields JA, Bakewell B, Augsberger JJ, Flanagan JC. Classification and incidence of space-occupying lesions of the orbit. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 106–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith RE, McDonald HR, Nesburn AB, Minckler DS. Penetrating keratoplasty. Changing indications, 1947 to 1978. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 1226–1229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tesluk GC. Eyelid lesions: incidence and comparison of benign and malignant lesions. Ann Ophthalmol 1985; 17: 704–707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Toshida H, Nakayasu K, Okisaka S, Kanai A. Incidence of tumors and tumor-like lesions in the conjunctiva and the cornea. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1995; 99: 186–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson MW, Buggage RR, Grossniklaus HE. Orbital lesions in the southeastern United States. Orbit 1996; 15: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ajaiyeoba IA, Pindiga HU, Akang EEU. Tumours of the eye and orbit in Ibadan. East Afr Med J 1992; 69: 487–489.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ammann PB. Zahlen und Gedanken zur Enukleation des Auges. Untersuchungen am Krankengut der Basler Universitäts-Augenklinik 1930–1954. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1962; 140: 238–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Apt L, Sarin LK. Causes for enucleation of the eye in infants and children. JAMA 1962; 181: 948–953.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Batten KL. Causes of enucleation as seen in Jerusalem. Br J Ophthalmol 1971; 55: 174–176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Davanger M. Causes of enucleation in Uganda. Br J Ophthalmol 1970; 54: 252–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Gottrau P, Holbach LM, Naumann GOH. Clinicopathological review of 1146 enucleations (1980–1990). Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 260–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Erie JC, Nevitt MP, Hodge D, Ballard DJ. Incidence of enucleation in a defined population. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 113: 138–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Freitag SK, Eagle RC, Jaeger EA, Dunn ES, Jeffers JB. An epidemiologic and pathologic study of globes enucleated following trauma. Ophthalmic Surg 1992; 23: 409–413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gaßler N, Lommatzsch PK. Klinisch-pathologische Studie an 817 Enukleationen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1995; 207: 295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaimbo K. Les causes d’énucléation au Zaïre. J Fr Ophthalmol 1988; 11: 677–680.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim JKS, Cinotti AA. Causes for removal of the eye. Ann Ophthalmol 1976; 8: 865–869.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Margo CE. Surgical enucleation in community hospitals. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108: 452–453.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayer LL. Cause for removal of the eye. Illinois Med 1936; 69: 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Naumann GOH, Portwich E. Ätiologie und letzter Anlaß zu 1000 Enukleationen (Eine klinisch-ophthalmologische Studie). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1976; 168: 622–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Engel H, de la Cruz ZC, Jimenez-Abalahin LD, Green WR, Michels RG. Cytopreparatory techniques for eye fluid specimens obtained by vitrectomy. Acta Cytologica 1982; 26: 551–560.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spencer WH (ed) Ophthalmic pathology. An atlas and textbook. Volume 1–4. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1996

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon D, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 240–243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Engel HM, Green WR, Michels RG, Rice TA, Erozan YS. Diagnostic vitrectomy. Retina 1981; 1: 121–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Green WR. Diagnostic cytopathology of ocular fluid specimens. Ophthalmol 1984; 91: 726–749.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 1995; 39: 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson MW, Grossniklaus HE. Orbital diseases in North America. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 1997; 9: 939–947.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jones HS, Yates JM, Spurgeon P, Fiedler AR. Geographical variations in rates of ophthalmic surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 784–788.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Welch RB, Duke JR. Lesions of the lid: a statistical note. Am J Ophthalmol 1958; 45: 414–416.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Aurora AL, Blodi FC. Lesions of the eyelids: a clinicopathological study. Surv Ophthalmol 1970; 15: 94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Karp LA, Zimmerman LE, Borit A, Spencer WH. Primary intraorbital meningioma. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 91: 24–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stefani FH. Phthisis bulbi–an intraocular floride proliferative reaction. Dev Ophthalmol 1985; 10: 78–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Punnonen E. Pathological findings in eyes enucleated because of perforating injury. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 265–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Christoph W. Spraul & Hans E. Grossniklaus

Authors
  1. Christoph W. Spraul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans E. Grossniklaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spraul, C.W., Grossniklaus, H.E. Analysis of 24,444 surgical specimens accessioned over 55 years in an ophthalmic pathology laboratory. Int Ophthalmol 21, 283–304 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006047803924

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006047803924

Search

Navigation