Skip to main content
Log in

The DICOM image formatting standard: its role in echocardiography and angiography

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both echocardiography and angiography have traditionally used analog media for long-term storage, but increasingly there is the desire to develop digital storage and exchange methodology. Before digital storage can become a reality, though, standards must be agreed to by the vendor and user community to ensure global intra operability of medical instrumentation. To this end, the National Electrical Manufacturers' Association and various professional organizations from around the world have collaborated to develop the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) image formatting standard. This standard specifies the exact way in which digital images are exchanged between instruments, either using a network or storage medium, and distinct standards have been developed for angiography and echocardiography. In angiography, only gray scale images are considered, whereas in echocardiography several different types of image formats are allowed to account for color Doppler echocardiography. Distinct standards have also evolved for disk-based storage. For angiography, only storage on the writable CD-ROM is allowed, whereas echocardiograms may be stored on re-writable magneto-optical disks, floppy disks, and CD-ROMs. Only lossless compression is allowed in the angiographic standard, whereas echocardiography allows the use of the JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) lossy compression algorithm. Currently, all major angiographic and echocardiographic vendors have agreed to support the DICOM standard, and products are beginning to appear, first with disk-based storage but increasingly with network-based exchange of image data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM, Block PC, Bonchek LI, Brinker JA, Carabello B, Douglas JSJ, Elion JL, Hirshfeld JWJ, Holmes DR, Johnson WL, Klinke WP, Levin DC, Mancini GBJ, Mullins CE, Thomas JD, Topol EJ, Vogel JHK, Wondrow MA. Cardiac angiography without cine film: Erecting a ‘tower of Babel’ in the cardaic catheterization laboratory (American College of Cardiology position statement). J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 834–837.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas JD, Khandheria BK. Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers [see comments]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7: 100–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas JD, Nissen SE: Digital storage and transmission of cardiovascular images: Is now the time to invest? Invited editorial for Heart 1996; 76: 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standard, Version 3.0. Washington, D.C.: National Electrical Manufacturer Association (NEMA), Washington, D.C., 1994: Parts 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas JD. The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: What it means for echocardiographers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 319–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feigenbaum H. Digital recording, display, and storage of echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1988; 1: 378–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karson TH, Chandra S, Morehead AJ, Stewart WJ, Nissen SE, Thomas JD. JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 306–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karson TH, Zepp RC, Chandra S, Morehead A, Thomas JD: Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage even with 20: 1 digital compression: Results of the Digital ERA (Echo Record Access) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 769–778.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas JD, Chandra S, Karson TH, Pu M, Vandervoort PM: Digital compression of echocardiograms: Impact on quantitative interpretation of color Doppler velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 606–615.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brar R, Yurow G, Neumann A, Stamos T, Garcia M, Stoddard M, Cherian PK, Thomas JD, Soble JS: Comparison of MPEG digital image compression with super VHS for diagnostic echocardiographic readings (abstract). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 409

    Google Scholar 

  11. Main M, Foltz D, Babinsky E, Bailey D, Frantz B, Pleva D, Baldizzi M, Myers D, Jones K, Spence M, Freeman K, Morehead A, Thomas J. Real-time transmission of echocardiographic images over high speed networks: Effects of bandwidth, cell loss ratio and cell error ratio on image quality (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 259A.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas JD. Digital storage and retrieval: The future in echocardiography. Heart 1997; 78: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, J.D. The DICOM image formatting standard: its role in echocardiography and angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 14 (Suppl 1), 1–6 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006018614132

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006018614132

Navigation