Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 39–50 | Cite as

An ABC-analysis of Ethical Organizational Behavior

  • André H. J. Nijhof
  • Marius M. Rietdijk
Article

Abstract

The Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC)-analysis is a tool for analyzing behavior and stems from the field of psychology where it is used as a tool for the understanding of behavior in general and organizational behavior in particular. In this paper the ABC-analysis is implemented as a tool to understand why people behave ethically in organizations, through the identification of key environmental factors that cause such behavior. This analysis can be the first step to recognizing the complexity of circumstances determining ethical behavior, as well as trigger for changing that behavior. This will be elaborated in the implementation process of an ethical code. The working of the ABC-analysis will be illustrated with an example derived from field research concerning the reorganization of a department of a chemical company.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badaracco, J. L. Jr.: 1992, ‘Business Ethics: Four Spheres of Executive Responsibility’, California Management Review (Spring), 64–79.Google Scholar
  2. Brockner, J.: 1992, ‘Managing the Effects of Layoffs on Survivors’, California Management Review (Winter), 9–28.Google Scholar
  3. Catania: 1992, 3rd ed., Learning (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  4. Chen, A. Y. S., R. B. Sawyer and P. F. Williams: 1997, ‘Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Corporate Culture’, Jornal of Business Ethics 167, 855–865.Google Scholar
  5. Daniels, A. C.: 1989, Performance Management (Performance Management Publications, Tucker (Georgia)).Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, A. C.: 1994, Bringing Out the Best in People (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Davis, T. R. V. and F. Luthans: 1979, ‘Leadership Reexamined: A Behavioral Approach’, Academy of Management Review 4, 237–248.Google Scholar
  8. Fisscher, O. A. M.: 1994, Kwaliteitsmanagment en bedrijfsethisch handelen, oratie aan de Universiteit Twente, 10 februari 1994.Google Scholar
  9. French, P. A.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  10. George, R. T. de.: 1993, Competing with Integrity in International Business (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Grant, L. and A. Evans: 1994, Principles of Behavior Analysis (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg, J.: (1986), ‘The Distributive Justice of Organizational Performance Evaluations’, in Justice in Social Relations (Bierhoff, Cohen, Greenberg).Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg, J.: 1993, ‘Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54(1), 81–103.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, J. R. and C. D. Sutton: 1995, ‘Unravelling the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Clues from an Empirical Study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 805–817.Google Scholar
  15. Hekman, S. J.: 1995, Moral Voices, Moral Selves; Coral Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).Google Scholar
  16. Jackal, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes; The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  17. Jennings, M. M.: 1996, 2nd. Ed., Case Studies in Business Ethics (West Publishing, St. Paul).Google Scholar
  18. Jones, G. E. and M. J. Kavanagh: 1996, ‘An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(5) (May), 511–523.Google Scholar
  19. Kaptein, S. P.: 1993, ‘De effectiviteit van ethische bedrijfscodes’, Bedrijfskunde, 186–195.Google Scholar
  20. Kohlberg, L.: 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  21. Komaki, J. L.: 1986, ‘Toward Effective Supervision: An Operant Analysis and Comparison of Managers at Work’, Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 270–279.Google Scholar
  22. MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory, second edition (Notre Dame, IN).Google Scholar
  23. March, J. G. and H. A. Simon: 1958, Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, R. B.: 1993, ‘Self-and Co-Worker Perceptions of Ethics and Their Relationships to Leadership and Salary’, Academy of Management Journal 36(1), 200–214.Google Scholar
  25. Nash, L.: 1981, ‘Ethics Without the Sermon’, Harvard Business Review (Nov.–Dec.), 79–90.Google Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M.: 1986, The Fragility of Goodness; Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (C.U.P., Cambridge).Google Scholar
  27. Rest, J. R.: 1985, ‘An Interdisciplinary Approach to Moral Education’, in M. W. Berkowitz and F. Oser (eds.), Moral Education; Theory and Application (New Jersey).Google Scholar
  28. Rutte, G. and D. M. Messick: 1995, ‘An Integrated Model of Perceived Unfairness in Organizations’, Social Justice Research 8(3).Google Scholar
  29. Scott-Morgan, P.: 1994, The Unwritten Rules of the Game: Master Them, Shatter Them, and Break Through the Barriers to Organizational Change (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A.: 1992, Inequality Reexamined, Russel Sage Foundation (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  31. Skinner, B. F.: 1938, The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
  32. Skinner, B. F.: 1966, ‘What is the Experimental Analysis of Behavior?’, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 9, 213–218.Google Scholar
  33. Sulzer-Azaroff, B. and G. R. Mayer: 1991, Behavior Analysis for Lasting Change (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London).Google Scholar
  34. Trevino, L. K.: 1996, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  35. Velasquez, M. G.: 1988, 2nd. Ed., Business Ethics; Concepts and Cases (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).Google Scholar
  36. Victor, B. and J. B. Cullen: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101–125.Google Scholar
  37. Wyld, D. C. and C. A. Jones: 1997, ‘The Importance of Context: The Ethical Work Climate Construct and Models of Ethical Decision Making – An Agenda for Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 465–472.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • André H. J. Nijhof
    • 1
  • Marius M. Rietdijk
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and ManagementUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations