Skip to main content

An ex-post methodology for measuring poor people's participation in social forestry: an example from Java, Indonesia

Abstract

One of the key goals of social forestry is to involve the poor as project beneficiaries. It is possible to measure the degree of attainment of this goal by collecting socioeconomic data before and after project implementation. This approach cannot be applied at the many sites where ex-ante data were never gathered. This article proposes a methodology for evaluating the degree of inclusion of the poor in social forestry using ex-post data alone. Longitudinal analysis is approximated through the use of ‘slow change’ socioeconomic variables and through logistic regression. The methodology is illustrated with data on the Java Social forestry Program.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Campbell DT and Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colchester M (1994) Sustaining the forests: the community-based approach in South and South-East Asia. Development and Change 25(1): 69-100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregersen H, Draper S and Elz D (eds) (1989) People and Trees: The Role of Social Forestry in Sustainable Development. EDI Seminar Series. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malhotra KC and Poffenberger M (eds) (1989) Forest Regeneration Through Community Protection: The West Bengal Experience. Proceedings of the Working Group Meeting on Forest Protection Committees, Calcutta, June 21–22, 1989

  5. Mellor JW (1969) The subsistence farmer in traditional economies. In: Wharton CR (ed) Subsistence Agriculture and Economic Development, pp 209-227. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pasicolan PN (1996) Tree growing on different grounds: analysis of local participation in contract reforestation in the Philippines. Centre for environmental Studies, Leiden University, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peluso NL (1986) Report on social forestry research in West and Central Java, October 1984–October 1985. Report prepared for the State Forestry Corporation and the Ford Foundation

  8. Peluso NL (1992) Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peluso N and Poffenberger M (1989) Social forestry in Java: reorienting management systems. Human Organization 48(4): 333-344

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rao VVB (1984) Poverty in Indonesia: Trends, Associated Characteristics and Research Issues. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sajogyo (1980) Masalah kecukupan pangan dalam jalur-jalur pemerataan. Prisma. No. 9

  12. Sajogyo and Wiradi G (1985) Rural poverty and efforts for its alleviation in Indonesia: a sociological review. Food and Agriculture Organization

  13. Scott JC (1976) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA and London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seymour FJ (1991) Social forestry on public lands in Indonesia: a blurring of ends and means. Case study presented at the conference 'social Forestry: Communal and Private Management Strategies Compared', February 14, SAIS, The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. SFC (State Forestry Corporation) (1988) Pedoman Pelaksanaan Perhutanan Sosial. Perum Perhutani, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shah T (1988) Gains from social forestry: lessons from West Bengal. Discussion Paper, No 243. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simon H and Wiersum KF (1992) Taungya cultivation in Java, Indonesia: agrisilvicultural and socioeconomic aspects. In: Jordan CF, Gajaseni J and Watanabe H (eds) Taungya, Forest Plantations with Agriculture in Southeast Asia. Sustainable Development Series No. 1, pp 101-111. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skutsch MM (1994) Social forestry as sustainable development: comparative strategies in Sri Lanka. Thesis, University of Enschede, the Netherlands, 283 pp

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suhita C and Chatterjee D et al. (1990) Integrating conservation and development: a case study of the socio-economic forestry complex at Arabari, West Bengal. Int Tree Crops J 6(2–3): 193-204

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sunderlin WD, Artono A, Palupi S, Rochyana and Susanti E (1990) Social equity and social forestry in Java: preliminary findings from four case studies. Overseas Development Institute, Social Forestry Network, Network Paper 10A, London, UK

  21. Sunderlin WD (1993) Environment, equity, and the state: a perspective through the Java Social Forestry Program. Ph D dissertation, Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sunderlin WD (1994) Bureaucracy and equitable development: the Java Social Forestry Program. East-West Center Working Papers, Environment Series, No 35, March. East-West Center, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wiersum KF (1994) Social forestry in South and South-East Asia: history and new perspectives. In: Simon H et al. (eds) Social Forestry and sustainable Forest Management. pp 1-27. Perum Perhutani, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  24. World Bank (1990) Indonesia: Strategy for a Sustained Reduction in Poverty. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sunderlin, W.D. An ex-post methodology for measuring poor people's participation in social forestry: an example from Java, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 37, 297–310 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005977907533

Download citation

  • evaluation
  • forest management
  • Indonesia
  • poverty
  • social forestry