Skip to main content
Log in

The sequence and structure of the 3′-untranslated regions of chloroplast transcripts are important determinants of mRNA accumulation and stability

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general characteristic of the 3′-untranslated regions (3′ UTRs) of plastid mRNAs is an inverted repeat (IR) sequence that can fold into a stem-loop structure. These stem-loops are RNA 3′-end processing signals and determinants of mRNA stability, not transcription terminators. Incubation of synthetic RNAs corresponding to the 3′ UTRs of Chlamydomonas chloroplast genes atpB and petD with a chloroplast protein extract resulted in the accumulation of stable processing products. Synthetic RNAs of the petA 3′ UTR and the antisense strand of atpB 3′ UTR were degraded in the extract. To examine 3′ UTR function in vivo, the atpB 3′ UTR was replaced with the 3′ UTR sequences of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast genes petD, petD plus trnR, rbcL, petA and E. coli thrA by biolistic transformation of Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. Each 3′ UTR was inserted in both the sense and antisense orientations. The accumulation of both total atpB mRNA and ATPase β-subunit protein in all transformants was increased compared to a strain in which the atpB 3′ UTR had been deleted. However, the level of discrete atpB transcripts in transformants containing the antisense 3′ UTR sequences was reduced to approximately one-half that of transformants containing the 3′ UTRs in the sense orientation. These results imply that both the nucleotide sequences and the stem-loop structures of the 3′ UTRs are important for transcript 3′-end processing, and for accumulation of the mature mRNAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barkan A: Proteins encoded by a complex chloroplast transcription unit are each translated from both monocistronic and polycistronic mRNAs. EMBO J 7: 2637–2644 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blowers AD, Klein U, Ellmore GS, Bogorad L: Functional in vivo analyses of the 3′ flanking sequences of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast rbcL and psaB genes. Mol Gen Genet 238: 339–349 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Q, Adams CC, Usack L, Yang J, Monde R-A, Stern DB: An AU-rich element in the 3′untranslated region of the spinach chloroplast petD gene participates in sequence-specific RNA-protein complex formation. Mol Cell Biol 15: 2010–2018 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Drager RG, Zeidler M, Simpson CL, Stern DB: A chloroplast transcript lacking the 3′ inverted repeat is degraded by 3′ → 5′ xoribonuclease activity. RNA 2: 652–663 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B: Atechnique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132: 6–13 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayes R, Kudla J, Schuster G, Gabay L, Maliga P, Gruissem W: Chloroplast mRNA 3′-end processing by a high molecular weight protein complex is regulated by nuclear encoded RNA binding proteins. EMBO J 15: 1132–1141 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee H, Bingham SE, Webber AN: Function of 3′ non-coding sequences and stop codon usage in expression of the chloroplast psaB gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Mol Biol 31: 337–354 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lisitsky I, Klaff P, Schuster G: Addition of destabilizing poly(A)-rich sequences to endonuclease cleavage sites during the degradation of chloroplast mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13398–13403 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lisitsky I, Liveanu V, Schuster G: RNA-binding characteristics of a ribonucleoprotein from spinach chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 107: 933–941 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marzluff WF: Histone 3′ ends: essential and regulatory functions. Gene Expr 2: 93–97 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merchant S, Selman BR: Synthesis and turnover of the chloroplast coupling factor in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol 75: 781–787 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nierlich DP, Murakawa GJ: The decay of bacterial messenger RNA. In: Cohn WE, Moldave K (eds) Progress in Nucleic Acid Research andMolecular Biology, pp. 153–216. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rott R, Drager RG, Stern DB, Schuster G: The 3′ untranslated regions of chloroplast genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii do not serve as efficient transcriptional terminators. Mol Gen Genet 252: 676–683 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rott R, Nelson N: Purification and immunological properties of proton-ATPase complexes from yeast and rat liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem 256: 9224–9228 (1981).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuster G, Gruissem W: ChloroplastmRNA3′ end processing requires a nuclear-encoded RNA binding protein. EMBO J 10: 1493–1502 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuster G, Timberg R, Ohad I: Turnover of thylakoid photosystem II proteins during photo inhibition of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eur J Biochem 177: 403–410 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shepherd HS, Boynton JE, Gilham NW: Mutations in nine chloroplast loci of Chlamydomonas affecting photosynthetic functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 1353–1357 (1979).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Standart N, Jackson RJ: Regulation of translation by specific protein/mRNA interactions. Biochimie 76: 867–879 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stern DB, Gruissem W: Control of plastid gene expression: 3′inverted repeats act as mRNA processing and stabilizing elements, but do not terminate transcription. Cell 51: 1145–1157 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stern DB, Gruissem W: Chloroplast messenger RNA 3′ end maturation is biochemically distinct from prokaryotic messenger RNA processing. Plant Mol Biol 13: 615–625 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stern DB, Jones H, Gruissem W: Function of plastid mRNA 3′ inverted repeats. RNA stabilization and gene-specific protein binding. J Biol Chem 264: 18742–50 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stern DB, Kindle KL: 3′end maturation of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast atpB mRNA is a two-step process. Mol Cell Biol 13: 2277–2285 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stern DB, Radwanski ER, Kindle KL: A 3′stem/loop structure of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB gene regulates mRNA accumulation in vivo. Plant Cell 3: 285–297 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wahle E, Keller W: The biochemistry of 3′-end cleavage and polyadenylation ofmessenger RNAprecursors. Annu Rev Biochem 61: 419–440 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woessner JP, Gillham NW, Boynton JE: The sequence of the chloroplast atpB gene and its flanking regions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Gene 44: 17–28 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang J, Schuster G, Stern DB: CSP41, a sequence-specific chloroplast mRNA binding protein, is an endoribonuclease. Plant Cell 8: 1409–1420 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rott, R., Liveanu, V., Drager, R.G. et al. The sequence and structure of the 3′-untranslated regions of chloroplast transcripts are important determinants of mRNA accumulation and stability. Plant Mol Biol 36, 307–314 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005943701253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005943701253

Navigation