Skip to main content
Log in

Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that the alternation between syntactically accusative and ergative clauses in Balinese results from different mappings between argument structure and syntactic realization. Our version of argument structure, essentially the ARG-S feature of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, is the locus of anaphoric binding conditions. We further assume that passive, causative, and applicative are morpholexical operations on argument structure. This set of assumptions allows us to explain (i) why conditions on Balinese binding are generally ‘thematic’ and independent of ‘surface’ grammatical relations or phrase structure position; and (ii) the specific exceptions to such thematic conditions that arise with raised arguments, direct/oblique alternations, and passive by-phrases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åfarli, Tor A: 1989, ‘Passive in Norwegian and in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 20(1), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Alex and Sam Mchombo: 1993, ‘Object Asymmetries and the Chichewa Applicative Construction’, in S. Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 17–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Avery: 1985, ‘The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology Syntactic Description, vol. I: Clause Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 62–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arka, I Wayan: 1997, ‘On the Double Life of a Pronominal Form and Two Passives in Balinese’, departmental seminar paper, University of Sydney Linguistics Department, Sydney, Australia, May 9, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arka, I Wayan: in progress, From Morpho-syntax to Pragmatics in Balinese, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

  • Arka, I Wayan and Stephen Wechsler: 1996, ‘Argument Structure and Linear Order in Balinese Binding’, paper read at the Workshop on Lexical-Functional Grammar, Grenoble, France, August 26–28, 1996.

  • Artawa, K.: 1994, Ergativity and Balinese Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

  • Baker, C. L.: 1995, ‘Contrast, Discourse Prominence, and Intensification, with Special Reference to Locally Free Reflexives in British English’, Language 71(1), 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation — A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik: 1986, ‘A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale: 1996, ‘Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class’, Linguistic Inquiry 27(4), 531–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1995a, ‘Morphology Competes with Syntax: Explaining Typological Variation in Weak Crossover Effects’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford.

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1995b, ‘Linear Order, Syntactic Rank, and Empty Categories: On Weak Crossover’, in M. Dalrymple, R. M. Kaplan, J. T. Maxwell III, and A. Zaenen (eds.), Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 241–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Jonni Kanerva: 1989, ‘Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi: 1990, ‘Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 21(2), 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, Jill and Janet Randall: 1992, ‘The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23(2), 173–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1976, ‘On the Subject of Two Passives in Indonesian’, in C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York, pp. 57–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1978, Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clynes, Adrian: 1995, Topics in the Phonology and Morphosyntax of Balinese: Based on a Dialect of Singaraja, North Bali, unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Australia National University.

  • Dalrymple, Mary: 1993, The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Tony: 1996, Linking and the Hierarchical Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford.

  • Dixon, R. M. W.: 1979, ‘Ergativity’, Language 55, 59–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W.: 1994, Ergativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durie, Mark: 1985, A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka: 1988, ‘On Obligatory Control’, Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folcy, William and Robert Van Valin: 1984, Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawron, Jean Mark: 1986, ‘Situations and Prepositions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 327–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, Allesandra: 1984, ‘Toward a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach’, The Linguistic Review 3, 307–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travis: 1992, ‘SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10(3), 375–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellan, Lars: 1988, Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keonan, E. and B. Comrie: 1977, ‘Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, Paul: 1993, Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.: 1969, ‘On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command’, in D. A. Reibel and S. A. Schane (eds), Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 160–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth: 1983, On the Nature of Ergativity, unpublished Ph.D. disscrtation, MIT, Cambridge.

  • Manning, Chris: 1994, Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford.

  • Manning, Chris and Ivan Sag: 1995, ‘Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations’, unpublished manuscript (http://www.lcl.cmu.edu/manning/papers/tuebingen.ps).

  • Marantz, Alec: 1984, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1987, Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, vol. I: Fundamentals, Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1992, ‘Anaphors in English and the Scope of Binding Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 23(2), 261–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California; and University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul: 1971, Cross-Over Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reape, Mike: 1994, ‘Domain Union and Word Order Variation in German’, in John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter and Carl Pollard (eds.), German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford University, pp. 151–197.

  • Sag, Ivan and Carl Pollard: 1991, ‘An Integrated Theory of Complement Control’, Language 67, 63–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, Paul: 1977, ‘Reference-Related and Role-Related Properties of Subjects’, in Peter Cole and Jerrold Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 279–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, Paul: 1984, ‘Semantic-Role-Based Syntax in Toba Batak’, in P. Schachter (ed.), Studies in the Structure of Toba Batak, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 5, UCLA, pp. 122–149.

  • Travis, Lisa: 1997, ‘Theta-positions and Binding in Balinese and Malagasy’, paper presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, University of California at Los Angeles, April 27, 1997.

  • Wechster, Stephen: 1994, ‘Preposition Selection Outside the Lexicon’, in R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss, and Martha Senturia (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 416–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, Stephen: 1995, The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, Stephen and I Wayan Arka: 1997, ‘Balinese Binding and Raising’, paper presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, University of California at Los Angeles, April 26, 1997.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woollams, Geoff: 1996, A Grammar of Karo Batak, Sumatra, Pacific Linguistics Series C-130, Department of Linguistics, Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson: 1985, ‘Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 441–483.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wechsler, S., Arka, I.W. Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 387–442 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005920831550

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005920831550

Keywords

Navigation