Abstract
Photosynthesis is an important component of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield, but little has been done to increase the photosynthetic performance within the cotton germplasm pool. Part of this dilemma is due to the multi-component aspect of this process and also to lack of information on genetic variation among such components. The objectives of this research were to identify genetic variability in photosynthetic components for six cotton genotypes previously shown to differ in leaf CO2-exchange rates (CER) and to determine if an afternoon decline in photosynthesis altered genotypic differences in CER. CO2-exchange rates were measured at several internal CO2 levels (Ci) to generate CER vs. Ci curves for each genotype and thereby isolate some of the components of photosynthesis. Ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco), hydroxypyruvate reductase, malate dehydrogenase, and catalase activities were assayed on leaves used to generate the CER vs. Ci curves. Ambient CER and chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence measurements were taken before and after solar noon to test for an afternoon decline in photosynthesis. Dixie King, a low ambient CER genotype, exhibited a greater CO2 compensation point, lower carboxylation efficiency, and reduced Photosystem II (PS II) activity than the other genotypes. The carboxylation efficiency of DES 119 was 13% greater than STV 508 and 29% greater than Dixie King, but not different from the other genotypes in 1994. Pee Dee 3 had greater maximum assimilation rate (A) than all other genotypes except STV 213 in 1993. Although no significant genotype by time of day interaction was detected, CER and Chl fluorescence variable to maximum ratio (Fv/Fm) were reduced 8% and 39%, respectively, in the afternoon as compared to the morning. This study demonstrates genetic variations in many of the components of photosynthesis. However, the narrow range of variation in such components for superior photosynthesizing genotypes explains why difficulties are encountered when breeding for increased photosynthesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin RB (1994) Plant breeding opportunities. In: Boote KJ, Bennett JM, Sinclair TR and Paulsen GM (eds) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield, pp 567–586. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI
Azcón-Bieto J, Farquhar GD and Caballero A (1981) Effects of temperature, oxygen concentration, leaf age and seasonal variations on the CO2 compensation point of Lolium perene L. Comparison with a mathematical model including non-photorespiratory CO2 production in light. Planta 152: 497–504
Baker NR and Ort DR (1992) Light and crop photosynthetic performance. In: Baker NR and Thomas H (eds) Crop Photosynthesis: Spatial and Temporal Determinants, pp 289–312. Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Baldocchi DD, Verma SB and Rosenberg NJ (1981) Mass and energy exchanges of a soybean canopy under various environmental regimes. Agron J 73: 706–710
Benedict CR, Kohel RJ, Schubert AM and Keithly JH (1981) Species variation of photosynthesis in Gossypium. Am Soc Agron Abstr pp 79–80
Bhagsari AS and Brown RH (1986) Leaf photosynthesis and its correlations with leaf area. Crop Sci 26: 127–132
Bunce JA (1982) Photosynthesis at ambient and elevated humidity over a growing season in soybean. Photosynth Res 3: 307–311
Bunce JA (1983) Differential sensitivity to humidity of daily photosynthesis in the field in C3 and C4 species. Oecologia 57: 262–265
Cornish K, Radin JW, Turcotte EL, Lu Z and Zeiger E (1991) Enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) bred for increased yield. Plant Physiol 97: 484–489
Farquhar GD, Schulze ED and Küppers M (1980) Responses to humidity by stomata of Nicotiana glauca (L.) and Corylus avellana (L.) are consistent with the optimization of CO2 uptake with respect to H2O loss. Aust J Plant Physiol 7: 315–327
Farquhar GD and Sharkey TD (1994) Photosynthesis and carbon assimilation. In: Boote KJ, Bennett JM, Sinclair TR and Paulsen GM (eds) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield, pp 187–219. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI
Faver KL, Gerik TJ, Thaxton PM and El-Zik KM (1996) Late season water stress in cotton: II. Leaf gas exchange and assimilation capacity. Crop Sci 36: 992–928
Groom QJ, Long SP and Baker NR (1990) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in a winter wheat crop. In: Baltschevsky M (ed) Current Research in Photosynthesis, Vol II, pp 463–466. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Hinds MA and Milliken GA (1987) Statistical methods to use nonlinear models to compare silage treatments. Biometric 29: 825–834
Holden M (1976). Chlorophylls. In: Goodwin TW (ed) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments, pp 1–37. Academic Press, New York
Kohn LD and Warren WA (1970) The kinetic properties of spinach leaf glyoxylic acid reductase. J Biol Chem 245: 3831–3839
Krause GH and Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 313–349
Kunce CM and Trelease RN (1986) Heterogeneity of catalase in maturing and germinated cotton seeds. Plant Physiol 81: 1134–1139
McDermitt DK, Norman JM, Davis JT, Ball TM, Arkebauer TJ, Welles JM and Roemer SR (1989) CO2 response curves can be measured with a field-portable closed loop photosynthesis system. Ann Sci For 46: Suppl 416s–420
Morgan JA and LeCain DR (1991) Leaf gas exchange and related leaf traits among 15 winter wheat genotypes. Crop Sci 31: 443–448
Nafziger ED and Koller HR (1976) Influence of leaf starch concentration on CO2 assimilation in soybean. Plant Physiol 57: 560–563
Parker ML and Lea PJ (1983) Ultrastructure of the mesophyll cells of leaves of a catalase-deficient mutant of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Planta 159: 512–517
Peet MM and Kramer RJ (1980) Effects of decreasing source/sink ratio in soybean on photosynthesis, photorespiration and yield. Plant Cell Environ 3: 201–206
Perry SW, Krieg DR and Hutmacher RB (1983) Photosynthetic rate control in cotton. I. Photorespiration. Plant Physiol 73: 662–665
Pettigrew WT, Hesketh JD, Peters DB and Wooley JT (1990) A vapor pressure deficit effect on crop canopy photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 24: 27–34
Pettigrew WT and Meredith Jr WR (1994) Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci. 34: 700–705
Pettigrew WT, Heitholt JJ and Vaughn KC (1993) Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Sci 33: 1295–1299
Powles SB (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35: 15–44
Ratkowsky DA (1983) Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York
Tolbert NE, Oesser A, Kisaki T, Hageman RH and Yamazaki RK (1968) Peroxisomes from spinach leaves containing enzymes related to glycolate metabolism. J Biol Chem 243: 5179–5184
von Caemmerer S and Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387
Wells R, Meredith Jr WR and Williford JR (1986) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in nearisogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82: 635–640
Zelitch I (1992) Control of plant productivity by regulation of photorespiration. BioScience 42: 510–516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pettigrew, W., Turley, R. Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes. Photosynthesis Research 56, 15–25 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005902028459
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005902028459