Skip to main content
Log in

Honesty, Individualism, and Pragmatic Business Ethics: Implications for Corporate Hierarchy

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The boundaries of honesty are the focal point of this exploration of the individualistic origins of modernist ethics and the consequent need for a more pragmatic approach to business ethics. The tendency of modernist ethics to see honesty as an individual responsibility is described as a contextually naive approach, one that fails to account for the interactive effects between individual choices and corporate norms. By reviewing the empirical accounts of managerial struggles with ethical dilemmas, the article arrives at the contextual preconditions for encouraging the development of reflective moral agents in modern corporations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E.: 1993, Value in Ethics and Economics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, Jr. J. L. and A. P. Webb: 1995, ‘Business Ethics: A View From the Trenches’, California Management Review 37, 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H. and M. J. Karson: 1987, ‘Personal Values and Business Decisions: An Exploratory Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N. et al.: 1985, Habits of the Heart: Individualism in American Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1939, Freedom and Culture (Paragon, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1980, Theory of the Moral Life (Irvington, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • E'Tang, J.: 1992, ‘A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 737–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D.: 1977, Freedom Inside the Organization (McGraw Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H.: 1988, Passions Within Reason (Norton, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert, Jr.: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S.: 1989, Natural Reasons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1993, Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Service for Ethics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1949, ‘On a Supposed Right to Lie from Altruistic Motives’, in L. W. Beck (ed. and trans.), Immanuel Kant: Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. M.: 1986, ‘The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 15, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labich, K.: 1992, ‘The New Crisis in Business Ethics’, in John E. Richardson (ed.), Business Ethics 95/96 (Dushkin Publishing Group/Brown and Benchmark Publishers, Guilford, Connecticut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. C.: 1995, ‘Ethics of Business Students: Some Marketing Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M.: 1989, ‘Value Congruence: The Interplay of Individual and organizational value Systems’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 805–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue (Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, 2nd edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil R. F. and D. A. Pienta: 1994, ‘Economic Criteria Versus Ethical Criteria: Toward Resolving A Basic Dilemma in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. J.: 1995, ‘Corporate Moral Responsibility: When It Might Matter’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 555–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. P. and R. E. Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application’, Journal of Marketing (Jan.), 44–58.

  • Sandel, M.: 1982, Liberalism and The Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G. N. et. al.: 1995, ‘A Management Perspective on Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 603–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G. N. et. al.: 1994, ‘The Impact of the Work Environment on Ethical Decision-Making: Some Australian Evidence’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranga, K. G. and R. A. Turpen: 1991, ‘Ethical Judgments on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, L. A.: 1994, ‘Right vs. Wrong’, in John E. Richardson (ed.), Business Ethics 95/96 (Dushkin Publishing Group/Brown and Benchmark Publishers, Guilford, Connecticut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1989, Sources of the Self (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1991, The Ethics of Authenticity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinn, J.K., Reed, J.D., Browne, M.N. et al. Honesty, Individualism, and Pragmatic Business Ethics: Implications for Corporate Hierarchy. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1419–1430 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005787209221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005787209221

Navigation