Skip to main content
Log in

Media Factors Affecting the Performance of Upflow Anaerobic Packed-Bed Reactors

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that anaerobic packed-bed reactors (APBRs) containing media such as clay chip, small stone, and porous plastic modules are effective for treating a variety of organic wastes. Most of these studies focused on the treatment capabilities of the processes, yet little work was done about the factors affecting their designs and performance. This paper presents the results of a study on a laboratory scale APBR system examining the significance of media factors such as media roughness, specific surface area, porosity and pore size on treatment performance. The results showed that media roughness and pore size were more important over surface area on the reactor performance. Within the same media porosity, pore size plays a more significant role than surface area in term of COD removal efficiency. The study indicates that the ability of a support medium to retain biomass either as suspended growth entrapped in the void space, or by attachment to the media surface is a significant consideration in an upflow APBR. A testing protocol for measuring methane gas produced by the suspended biomass using a batch serum bottle technique was developed and presented in this study. The method involved measurements of hourly methane production and instantaneous TOC concentration from the suspended biological solids extracted from various reactor heights. The proportion of methane production associated with the suspended biomass was as high as 58% at organic loading rate of 16 g COD/L.day. The results suggest that media pore size and porosity play a significant role in the performance of upflow APBRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breitenbucher, et al. (1990). “Open-pore sintered glass as a high efficiency support medium in bioreactors: new results and long-term experiences achieved in high-rate anaerobic digestion.” Water. Sci. Tech., 22(1/2), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C.F., and Dague, R.R. (1988). “Determination of acetoclastic methanogenic activity in anaerobic systems.” Proc., 43rd Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson., J.W., et al. (1978). “Anaerobic packed column treatment of shellfish processing wastewater.” Proc., 33rd Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. J., and van den Berg, L. (1985). “Anaerobic downflow stationary fixed film reactors.” Comprehensive Biotechnology, Vol. 4, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1027–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, P.L. (1966). “Anaerobic treatment of soluble wastes.” Paper presented at the special lecture series on Advances in Water Quality Improvement, Univ. of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J.A., and Mancini, J.L. (1975). “Anaerobic filter-kinetics and applications.” Proc., 30th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, W.D., and van den Berg, L. (1981). “Effects of support material on the development of microbial fixed film converting acetic acid to methane.” applied Bacteriology, 51, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleszkiewicz, J., et al. (1986). “Performance of laboratory anaerobic hybrid reactors with varying depths of media.” Environ. Technol. Lett., 7, 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.J. (1986). “Support matrix and feed flow effects in anaerobic fixed-bed reactors.” PhD Thesis, Natl. Univ. Ire., Dublin.

  • Song, K.H., and Young, J.C. (1986). “Media design factors for fixed-bed anaerobic filters.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 58(2), 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed. (1992). American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, D.C.

  • Steinbrecher, P. (1988). “Effect of reactor height on anaerobic filter performance.” M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

  • Van den Berg, L., and Lentz, C.P. (1979). “Comparison between up-and down-flow anaerobic fixed film reactors of varying surface-to-volume ratios for the treatment of bean blanching waste.” Proc., 34th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, P., and Wulfert, K. (1988). “Anaerobic treatment of stillage using different pilotscale fixed bed reactors in and downflow mode of operation.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion, Bologna, Italy, May, 147–154.

  • Wilkie, A., and Colleran, E. (1984). “Start-up of anaerobic filter containing different support materials using pig slurry supernatant.” Biotechnol. Lett., 6, 735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, A., et al. (1983). “Media effects in anaerobic filters.” Proc., AWWT Symp. In Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment, TNO, The Hague, Netherlands, 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.C., and McCarty, P.L. (1967). “The anaerobic filter for waste treatment.” Proc., 22nd Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, May, R160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.C., and Dahab, M.F. (1982). “Retention and distribution of biological solids in fixed-bed anaerobic filters.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. Fixed-Film Biological Processes, Kings Island, Ohio.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joo-Hwa, T., Kuan-Yeow, S. & Jeyaseelan, S. Media Factors Affecting the Performance of Upflow Anaerobic Packed-Bed Reactors. Environ Monit Assess 44, 249–261 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005740708480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005740708480

Keywords

Navigation