Sentences in which a direct speech complement to a verb of saying is preposed or postposed can trigger inversion of the subject and the finite verb. This structure is analysed in a minimalist framework, leading to a revision of the minimalist theory of locality constraints on movement.
Evidence is presented to show that the subject remains in Spec-V andthe verb raises to Agro in quotative inversion sentences.The dirett speech constituent at the periphery of the clause is shownto control an empty operator which triggers the inversion in a manner parallel to French stylistic inversion. The inversion is derived from the checking theory by supposing a particular complementiser type which then selects weak N-features on its complement. A transitivity constraint on quotative inversion is discussed and the Minimal Link Condition is reformulated so that inversion is blocked in VPs in which there is both a quote and a DP complement. Finally, the position of the verb in quotative inversion is derived from the Revised Minimal Link Condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Branigan, Philip: 1992, Subjects and Complementizers, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Branigan, Philip: 1994, ‘Improper Movement and French Past Participle Agreement’, unpublished manuscript, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Branigan, Philip and Chris Collins: 1993, ‘Verb Movement and the Quotative Construction in English’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 1–13.
Bresnan, Joan: 1993, ‘Locative Inversion and the Architecture of UG’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, California.
Bures, Anton: 1992, ‘Re-cycling Expletive (and Other) Sentences’, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bures, Anton: 1993, ‘There is an Argument for an LF Cycle Here’, Chicago Linguistics Society 28, 14–35.
Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, Noam: 1986a, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chomsky, Noam: 1986b, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.
Chomsky, Noam: 1993, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–52.
Chomsky, Noam: 1994, ‘Bare Phrase Structure’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5.
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1993, ‘Principles and Parameters Theory’, in W. Sternefeld, J. Jacobs, A. van Stechow and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 506–569.
Chung, Sandra and James McCloskey: 1987, ‘Government, Barriers and Small Clauses in Modern Irish’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.
Collins, Chris: 1993, Topics in Ewe Syntax, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Collins, Chris: 1994a, ‘Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45–60.
Collins, Chris: 1994b, ‘Merge and Greed’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Collins, Chris: 1995, ‘Towards a Theory of Optimal Derivations’, Papers on Minimalist Syntax, MITWPL 18, 65–103.
Collins, Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson: 1994, ‘Object Shift in Double Object Constructions and the Theory of Case’, MITWPL 19, 131–174.
Collins, Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson: 1995, ‘VP Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Deprez, Vivianne: 1991, ‘Two Types of Verb Movement in French’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13, 47–85.
Green, Georgia M.: 1980, ‘Some Wherefores of English Inversions’, Language 56, 582–601.
Haegeman, Liliane and Raffaella Zanuttini: 1991, ‘Negative Heads and the Neg Criterion’, The Linguistic Review 8, 233–251.
Holmberg, Anders: 1986, Word Order and Syntactic Features, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Ken Safir (eds.): 1989, The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Jespersen, Otto: 1954, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Johnson, Kyle: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.
Jonas, Diane: 1994, ‘The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax’, in C. Hedlund and A. Holmberg (eds.), Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 70. Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 33–60.
Jonas, Diane and Jonathan Bobaljik: 1993, ‘Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 59–98.
Kayne, Richard S.: 1972, ‘French Relative “que”’ in F. Hensey and M. Luján (eds.), Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 255–299.
Kayne, Richard S.: 1989, ‘Facets of Past Participle Agreement in Romance’, in Paola Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation in the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103.
Kayne, Richard S.: 1995, The Annsymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kayne, Richard S. and J.-Y. Pollock: 1978, ‘Stylistic Inversion, Successive Cyclicity, and Move NP in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 595–621.
Koizumi, Masatoshi: 1993, ‘Object Agreement: Phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis’, Papers on Case and Agreement II: MITWPL 18, 99–148.
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappoport Hovav: 1994, Unaccusativity: At the Syntax Lexical Semantics Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
McCawley, James D.: 1982, ‘Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.
Pesetsky, David: 1982, Paths and Categories, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.
Postal, Paul: 1974, On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik: 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, New York.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1986, ‘Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17(3), 501–557.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Safir, Kenneth: 1985, Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Sportiche, Dominique: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.
Travis, Lisa: 1991, ‘Derived Objects, Inner Aspect, and the Structure of VP’, unpublished manuscript, McGill University.
Tuller, Laurice Anne: 1986, Bijective Relations in Universal Grammar and the Syntax of Hausa, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Ura, Hiroyuki: 1993, ‘L-relatedness and Its Parametric Variation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 377–399.
Valois, Daniel and Fernande Dupuis: 1992, ‘On the Status of (Verbal) Traces in French: The Case of Stylistic Inversion’, in P. Hirschbühler and K. Koerner (eds.), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 325–338.
Watanabe, Akira: 1993a, AGR-Based Case Theory, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Watanabe, Akira: 1993b, ‘Locative Inversion: Where Unaccusativity Meets Minimality’, unpublished manuscript, University of Tokyo.
Watanabe, Akira: 1994a, ‘The Conceptual Basis of Strict Cyclicity’, unpublished manuscript, Kanda University of International Studies, Japan.
Watanabe, Akira: 1994b, ‘A Crosslinguistic Perspective on Japanese Nominative-Genitive Conversion and Its Implications for Japanese Syntax’, unpublished manuscript, Kanda University of International Studies, Japan.
About this article
Cite this article
COLLINS, C., BRANIGAN, P. QUOTATIVE INVERSION. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15, 1–41 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005722729974
- Artificial Intelligence
- Link Condition
- Locality Constraint
- Minimalist Theory
- Direct Speech